Aller au contenu

Command & Conquer: Generals 2


283 réponses à ce sujet

#76
Nameless one7

Nameless one7
  • Members
  • 1 816 messages
So can we get some more info on the game from the Devs pls?

#77
Mr.House

Mr.House
  • Members
  • 23 338 messages
I still find it funny they kept on saying new franchise when it is not.

#78
twincast

twincast
  • Members
  • 829 messages

Brockololly wrote...

twincast wrote...

If I had been forced to bet I would've put my money on C&C:G2 after carefully reviewing all common theories, but yet I still can't quite believe it. BioWare + C&C does still not compute in my head.


Its because its not really BioWare- in that, I think when most people think of BioWare they're thinking Edmonton. This is just Victory Games  or EA LA which EA had BioWare gobble up once they became a fully fledged EA Label. Just seems EA is really trying to position BioWare as their own sort of Blizzard, between getting into strategy games and MMOs.

I'm fully aware of the facts, but I just can't think of it like that yet. In mine brainz.

And someone should tell EA already that you can't forcefully create a huge label and put its studios on a tight schedule of yearly releases and expect it to compete with Blizzard which not only grew organically, but is allowed to work on projects for as long as they want and/or feel the need to. Maybe if TOR turns into a proper cash cow EA will give BW the same kind of leeway? ... Buwahaha!

#79
twincast

twincast
  • Members
  • 829 messages

HyperLimited wrote...

"Ever-Evolving Experience — Enhance your game with an expanding array of downloadable content. From maps and units to factions, campaigns, and more, the fight against terrorism is deeper than ever."

Don't know about anyone else, but that was a big red-flag for me. :whistle:

yup

TheBlackBaron wrote...

As long as it's got
actual base building and large-scale strategy. I enjoy tactical RTSs
without those featrues, but lately it seems like those are all that gets
made. C&C4 (whatever it was official subtitled - Tiberium Twilight,
I think?) definitely fell victim to that trend. 

yup

Mr.House wrote...

I still find it funny they kept on saying new franchise when it is not.

yup

Modifié par twincast, 11 décembre 2011 - 02:16 .


#80
Hoogies123

Hoogies123
  • Members
  • 189 messages
Generals 2 from bioware, as much as I liked the first generals this is a little sad. Has c&c turned out any decent or profitable games in the past decade? But whatever maybe this drastic turn in gaming direction will be good? I'm not convinced though, having bioware do this is kinda strange, feels like they are trying to sell the company's name rather than the game

#81
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages
*yawn*

MMO, RTS... too bad Bioware is killing their RPGs.

#82
KenKenpachi

KenKenpachi
  • Members
  • 5 768 messages
So is this offical or not? If it is I'm somewhat disappointed. Not majorly, but still till I hear more about it I won't be rushing to buy it. Namely as with the last CNC games EA has shown a habit of ignoring the canon.

#83
Hardin4188

Hardin4188
  • Members
  • 127 messages
This is very disappointing. I don't understand why EA got rid of Westwood and continue to make C&C games. I haven't bought one since they killed Westwood, they just haven't been good. What's worse is that they are now putting the Bioware label on this. It's just a cheap marketing ploy.

Modifié par Hardin4188, 11 décembre 2011 - 02:24 .


#84
Nameless one7

Nameless one7
  • Members
  • 1 816 messages
They really didn't show enough in that trailer, it was to short.
On a side note, really looking forward to The Last of Us.

#85
addiction21

addiction21
  • Members
  • 6 066 messages

Brockololly wrote...


Still don't understand why they're slapping the BioWare name on this though. Unless its an avenue for them to eventually make Mass Effect or Dragon Age strategy games.


It is a breain teaser. I know EA's rpg group = "BioWare" this is kinda confusing.

But if they are going to go with strategy games Gimmie a Mass Effect one like Sins of a Solar Empire or Sword of the Stars.
And the Dragon Age would be nice as The LoTRR strat games or Warhammer Mark of Chaos.... that reminds me I am going to install the later I have needed a interesting game to play. I do Love the Skaven campaing in War March.

#86
Lord_Valandil

Lord_Valandil
  • Members
  • 2 837 messages
Meh. I saw it coming, but still...meh.

#87
Mr.House

Mr.House
  • Members
  • 23 338 messages

Nameless one7 wrote...


On a side note, really looking forward to The Last of Us.

:wizard:

#88
Dominus

Dominus
  • Members
  • 15 426 messages

I don't understand why EA got rid of Westwood and continue to make C&C games. I haven't bought one since they killed Westwood, they just haven't been good. What's worse is that they are now putting the Bioware label on this.


From what I gathered from the "All Your History" videos, they tried going in too far in different directions, then stuck to closely to the original, and overall it just wasn't making enough in sales.

#89
KenKenpachi

KenKenpachi
  • Members
  • 5 768 messages

addiction21 wrote...

Brockololly wrote...


Still don't understand why they're slapping the BioWare name on this though. Unless its an avenue for them to eventually make Mass Effect or Dragon Age strategy games.


It is a breain teaser. I know EA's rpg group = "BioWare" this is kinda confusing.

But if they are going to go with strategy games Gimmie a Mass Effect one like Sins of a Solar Empire or Sword of the Stars.
And the Dragon Age would be nice as The LoTRR strat games or Warhammer Mark of Chaos.... that reminds me I am going to install the later I have needed a interesting game to play. I do Love the Skaven campaing in War March.



If a bioware branch was going to make RTS I would have liked it being in universe properties.

As to something I seen above With Westwood, simple, its heads and EA's were butting heads.

#90
ObserverStatus

ObserverStatus
  • Members
  • 19 046 messages

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

C&C: Generals 2 by Bioware? Does that mean I can have sex with a meek, shy, nerd-geeky tank?

Hey, don't put it that way, the tank in question has a lot of DEPTH to it's chraracter, y'know? You make it sound so sleezy.

Modifié par bobobo878, 11 décembre 2011 - 02:32 .


#91
wolfsite

wolfsite
  • Members
  • 5 780 messages

Mr.House wrote...

I still find it funny they kept on saying new franchise when it is not.


Well Technically it will be new for Bioware since they have never touched franchise or genre before.

#92
packardbell

packardbell
  • Members
  • 2 388 messages
Well... that's my interest gone down to negative levels.

#93
Mr.House

Mr.House
  • Members
  • 23 338 messages

wolfsite wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

I still find it funny they kept on saying new franchise when it is not.


Well Technically it will be new for Bioware since they have never touched franchise or genre before.

That's not a new franchise.

#94
wolfsite

wolfsite
  • Members
  • 5 780 messages

Mr.House wrote...

wolfsite wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

I still find it funny they kept on saying new franchise when it is not.


Well Technically it will be new for Bioware since they have never touched franchise or genre before.

That's not a new franchise.

For them it is :wizard:

#95
eroeru

eroeru
  • Members
  • 3 269 messages

Nameless one7 wrote...

So can we get some more info on the game from the Devs pls?


I think Bioware themselves are not awesomely enthusiastic about this one - it's not their own choice to develop this game anyhow.

Will see how much love will put into raising this bastard child (if I may use such strong of a term).

Personally:
meh...

Modifié par eroeru, 11 décembre 2011 - 02:36 .


#96
Weak Sauce Hype

Weak Sauce Hype
  • Members
  • 236 messages
Will it be fully voiced? I'm probably gonna play as mostly renegade

#97
Lord_Valandil

Lord_Valandil
  • Members
  • 2 837 messages

wolfsite wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

wolfsite wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

I still find it funny they kept on saying new franchise when it is not.


Well Technically it will be new for Bioware since they have never touched franchise or genre before.

That's not a new franchise.

For them it is :wizard:


That's like saying that Metroid Other M is a new franchise because Team Ninja made it :innocent:

#98
saMoorai

saMoorai
  • Members
  • 2 745 messages
Kane for LI/Squad member

#99
wolfsite

wolfsite
  • Members
  • 5 780 messages

Lord_Valandil wrote...

wolfsite wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

wolfsite wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

I still find it funny they kept on saying new franchise when it is not.


Well Technically it will be new for Bioware since they have never touched franchise or genre before.

That's not a new franchise.

For them it is :wizard:


That's like saying that Metroid Other M is a new franchise because Team Ninja made it :innocent:


Okay I see people are missing the context.  From Bioware's perspective it is a new Franchise for them to be working on since they have never touched it before.  Yes for Team Ninja Metroid was a new franchise for them to be working on.

#100
Mr.House

Mr.House
  • Members
  • 23 338 messages

wolfsite wrote...
Okay I see people are missing the context.  From Bioware's perspective it is a new Franchise for them to be working on since they have never touched it before.  Yes for Team Ninja Metroid was a new franchise for them to be working on.

They never said it was a new franchise for them, they said they are working on a new franchise, if they really ment what you are saying, then they did a poor job explaining it and getting people excited.