Aller au contenu

Command & Conquer: Generals 2


283 réponses à ce sujet

#201
DivineBeetle

DivineBeetle
  • Members
  • 56 messages
I'll be passing on this too as RTS is not my thing. Will still follow it with interest though..

#202
Mr.House

Mr.House
  • Members
  • 23 338 messages

Ringo12 wrote...

The most important question will Bioware stick to the great B level acting that provides me so much laughter?


Says the person who liked Triss and Geralts voices. :lol:

#203
Sons of Horus

Sons of Horus
  • Members
  • 235 messages

KenKenpachi wrote...

Krusty84 wrote...

KenKenpachi wrote...
Then again maybe CNCG2 will be good.


No, because this "new" Bioware studio, consists of people who did RA3 and the C&C4... The Bioware brand is only for good revievs and milking fans.



Ahh so that team....yep its gonna be crap more likely than not.


Dam I had hoped for a new team. Still i guess wait and see is the best policy.

#204
Giltspur

Giltspur
  • Members
  • 1 117 messages
That release reads as "War is awseome, and there are no consequences!"

And that doesn't seem very interesting.

In particular these lines create a negative first impression:

In a world left with no politicians, diplomats, or activists, only the Generals remain.

This is the closest thing to real war without the consequences.

...from heroic General to crazed terrorist.


That just says "bad story" and "different target audience" to me.

Modifié par Giltspur, 11 décembre 2011 - 05:58 .


#205
XFemShepX

XFemShepX
  • Members
  • 251 messages
Yeah.....I'll pass. Not really my kind of thing.

Is Bioware just getting away from storytelling in their games, then?  This just seems like such an un-Bioware like kind of game to put out.  Not like DA, ME, Jade, KOTOR.....I'm all for new things, but I thought they'd announce an *original* new IP that was basically FPS/RPG.  This is unexpected, and not really in sync with Bioware's general fanbase, no?

Modifié par XFemShepX, 11 décembre 2011 - 06:05 .


#206
kofelover

kofelover
  • Members
  • 158 messages
Not interested in this at all, but good luck to them.

#207
Chromie

Chromie
  • Members
  • 9 881 messages

Mr.House wrote...

Ringo12 wrote...

The most important question will Bioware stick to the great B level acting that provides me so much laughter?


Says the person who liked Triss and Geralts voices. :lol:


I wasn't knocking the digital acting from previous Bioware games I meant will they keep th B level of acting of the Command and Conquer games :happy:

#208
Cross Hassan

Cross Hassan
  • Members
  • 51 messages
WTF....Does bioware own "Command & Conquer"...IDK?
Well well C & C Generals Zero Hour was my favourite and i have played it much. So, i will not hesitate it!

#209
JediHealerCosmin

JediHealerCosmin
  • Members
  • 2 289 messages
Should have been Jade Empire 2. 

#210
SNascimento

SNascimento
  • Members
  • 6 002 messages
Generals was my favorite C&C, so I'm pretty excited with this. It will be very interesting to see Bioware take on a RTS.
.
And I hope they manage to keep the awesome game mechanics of the previous Generals game, with realistic armies and special attacks.

#211
KenKenpachi

KenKenpachi
  • Members
  • 5 768 messages

SNascimento wrote...

Generals was my favorite C&C, so I'm pretty excited with this. It will be very interesting to see Bioware take on a RTS.
.
And I hope they manage to keep the awesome game mechanics of the previous Generals game, with realistic armies and special attacks.



Minus it IS NOT bioware, its the same team and dev that made the travisty called RA:3 CNC3-4, they just smacked a new label on them and made them a subdivision of bioware to milk the franchise some more.

#212
TheKillerAngel

TheKillerAngel
  • Members
  • 3 608 messages

Krusty84 wrote...

KenKenpachi wrote...
Then again maybe CNCG2 will be good.


No, because this "new" Bioware studio, consists of people who did RA3 and the C&C4... The Bioware brand is only for good revievs and milking fans.


http://www.gamasutra...med_BioWare.php

I hope they learn from past mistakes then.

#213
Annihilator27

Annihilator27
  • Members
  • 6 653 messages

KenKenpachi wrote...

SNascimento wrote...

Generals was my favorite C&C, so I'm pretty excited with this. It will be very interesting to see Bioware take on a RTS.
.
And I hope they manage to keep the awesome game mechanics of the previous Generals game, with realistic armies and special attacks.



Minus it IS NOT bioware, its the same team and dev that made the travisty called RA:3 CNC3-4, they just smacked a new label on them and made them a subdivision of bioware to milk the franchise some more.


I like CAC3 but CAC4 tiberium twilight was the worst.

#214
Nameless one7

Nameless one7
  • Members
  • 1 816 messages
The last Command and Conquer game I played was Red Alert 3, it didn't have the same charm as previous Command and COnquer games.

#215
Kaiser Shepard

Kaiser Shepard
  • Members
  • 7 890 messages

TheKillerAngel wrote...

RamirezWolfen wrote...

I'm disappointed that the game is PC only. I wanted an RTS to play on consoles.


My impression has been that RTS games dont work on consoles due to the high level of control you have to exert.

If they could make it into something similar to Halo Wars, I'm sure it would work. But that game was made specifically for a console...


TheKillerAngel wrote...

Blanchefleur wrote...

I will only try this game if you can customize your character (and be female!) and if there's romance! I have never played a game from this series before so I don't know anything about these games... But to be honest I'm not excited at all for this.


Is that some kind of joke?

Knowing these forums? Probably not.

#216
Arcadian Legend

Arcadian Legend
  • Members
  • 8 820 messages
I have no real interest in this game myself, not my kind of thing but I know someone personally who would.

#217
MerinTB

MerinTB
  • Members
  • 4 688 messages

bandfred wrote...

And you didn't fix, you bastardized.  You missed all about me saying I don't like modern, military, and especially modern military in games.  Company of Heroes you'd have to pay me to play.

...
You should feel bad.:(


And yet somehow I sleep at night. <_<

#218
MerinTB

MerinTB
  • Members
  • 4 688 messages

JediHealerCosmin wrote...
Should have been Jade Empire 2. 


At this point?  I'd have been okay with this.:blink:

#219
Guest_Luc0s_*

Guest_Luc0s_*
  • Guests

Mr.House wrote...

Ringo12 wrote...

The most important question will Bioware stick to the great B level acting that provides me so much laughter?


Says the person who liked Triss and Geralts voices. :lol:


Geralt and Triss have awesome voice-acting in The Witcher 2. Don't **** with The Witcher 2! :ph34r:

But yes, The Witcher 1's voice-acting was somewhat lacking.

Modifié par Luc0s, 11 décembre 2011 - 09:18 .


#220
Icinix

Icinix
  • Members
  • 8 188 messages
EA Board meeting....

EA Executive 1: Man - we totally screwed up the C&C franchise. We need a fix STAT!
EA Executive 2: Is there any companies we've bought that we haven't destroyed, sold off in pieces, or turned legions of fans against yet?
EA Executive 1: Yeah - BioWare is still doing ok, but there has been a few bumps recently, but there might be a bit in the tank...
EA Executive 2: I have an idea....

Thus C&C Generals was lifted from the void...

#221
wolfsite

wolfsite
  • Members
  • 5 780 messages

Luc0s wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

Ringo12 wrote...

The most important question will Bioware stick to the great B level acting that provides me so much laughter?


Says the person who liked Triss and Geralts voices. :lol:


Geralt and Triss have awesome voice-acting in The Witcher 2. Don't **** with The Witcher 2! :ph34r:

But yes, The Witcher 1's voice-acting was somewhat lacking.


Geralt's Voice is the reason I Don't play The Witcher :innocent:

#222
eroeru

eroeru
  • Members
  • 3 269 messages
I absolutely love Geralt's voice - sure it's lacking emotion, but that's exactly how it should be.

#223
Luvinn

Luvinn
  • Members
  • 502 messages

eroeru wrote...

I absolutely love Geralt's voice - sure it's lacking emotion, but that's exactly how it should be.


I second that. I think his voice fits the mood of the game perfectly.

On the topic of command and conquer though, I really was hoping for a new rpg type game. But I guess they already have the big two genres covered pretty well (sci-fi and fantasy). Maybe a change of scene will be refreshing.

#224
byzantine horse

byzantine horse
  • Members
  • 359 messages
An RTS? Cool, I loved those back in the day of AoE2 and TA, not played it much since though bar dabbling in Warcraft 3 on custom maps.

About AoE, someone should get on and make AoE4 soon, and go back to the roots of AoE2 and skip the ****tyness from the third game. God, that game was such a huge diasspointment, and neither EA nor Activision were involved which boggles the mind even more.

Geralt and Triss have awesome voice-acting in The Witcher 2. Don't **** with The Witcher 2! [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/ninja.png[/smilie]

But yes, The Witcher 1's voice-acting was somewhat lacking.


Somewhat?! The voiceacting of TW1, along with terrible gameplay, put me off from playing that game for more than 30 minutes. I understand that CDProjekt was a small studio back then but still, it was grating. TW2 isn't much of an improvement either, just your regular teenager's wet dream when you don't fight and when you do you are forced to roll around like pinball on steroids because if something touches you even once you are practically screwed - that isn't difficult just ****tery from the devs.

Modifié par byzantine horse, 11 décembre 2011 - 11:33 .


#225
Guest_Recon64bit_*

Guest_Recon64bit_*
  • Guests
Why is there no Generals section on here, if they truly are involved with this game?