1238 réponses à ce sujet

[PillarBiter]

Holy SH*T bioware, HO-LY SHI-YAT.

Look, I'll admit I had my doubts about ME3. Will it live up to it's own hype (thank your marketing departement for overhyping, seriously, tone it down)? But after seeign this? wow, I cant wait to play it again. Thank you.

I was totally like: HAHAAAAA GOOO THRESHER MAW GOOOOOOOO! HEY REAPER, WHO'S THE **** NOW, EY! AAAAAHAHAHAHAAAAA!

Modifié par MrCry0, 11 décembre 2011 - 02:47 .

[llandwynwyn]

I feel guilty for hunting Thresher Maws in ME1. lol

[Loup Blanc]

This trailer says that ME3 has gone full shooter, and it makes me sad. The original soul of ME is lost for good. ME1 was a RPG with shooter elements. ME2 was a hybrid shooter/cinematic RPG. Here, from what they've shown, they are advertising an over-the-top Gears of War killer shooter with RPG elements. But we'll see if the final product is true to its marketing. I sincerely hope not.

At least, let's hope the story will be satisfying with proper closure for each character.

Modifié par JL81, 11 décembre 2011 - 02:53 .

[SNascimento]

JL81 wrote...

This trailer says that ME3 has gone full shooter, and it makes me sad. The original soul of ME is lost for good. ME1 was a RPG with shooter elements. ME2 was a hybrid shooter/cinematic RPG. Here, from what they've shown, they are advertising an over-the-top Gears of War killer shooter with RPG elements. But we'll see if the final product is true to its marketing. I sincerely hope not.

At least, let's hope the story will be satisfying with proper closure for each character.

.
With the marketing so far, I don't blame you for thinking like this. But the RPG elements will be even better in ME3 than they were in ME2. Fear not. 

[PsychoWARD23]

so why didn't the Reaper fly?


Edit;


And do the Turian ship sounds seem like Mario to anyone else? Around 0:32 ish

Modifié par PsychoWARD23, 11 décembre 2011 - 03:00 .

[CroGamer002]

JL81 wrote...

This trailer says that ME3 has gone full shooter, and it makes me sad. The original soul of ME is lost for good. ME1 was a RPG with shooter elements. ME2 was a hybrid shooter/cinematic RPG. Here, from what they've shown, they are advertising an over-the-top Gears of War killer shooter with RPG elements. But we'll see if the final product is true to its marketing. I sincerely hope not.

At least, let's hope the story will be satisfying with proper closure for each character.

*sees the Witcher avatar*


Why am I not surprised by this post being full of bollocks then?

[CroGamer002]

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

Does anyone get a feeling that Brute looks similiar to Ogre from DA1&2 ? I've made this creenshot to show u.

http://img259.images...60/me3brute.png

They looks NOTHING alike.


Not even same size.

[SNascimento]

ok, let's try to savage something from this awful trailer:
.
- The battle happening while you fight: I think it will be amazing going toward the reapers, fighting husks everywhere while you can see the reaper at distance and fighters in the sky, the dust flying around.... goddman, how a trailer that showed this can suck so badly?
.
- Vega's Holy Sh!t, it was amazing.
.
- Battles with multiple species: A lot of people were worried that ME3's story might just be a copy of DA:O.... meaning you go to different places, solve somebody problem and rally them to a last fight. This trailer showed the first sign that ME3 will be different. Why? Because this fight shows that there is war happening in the galaxy and that there will be a huge effort from different species to win it... not only in the final battle, but during the whole game.
.
- That new husks. They looks amazing! Can anyone post pictures?
.
- The final fight: we all knew it would happen, but seeing it was great.
.
And a negative note: Shepard running animation? Why only Bioware can't see it's bad? They should do Shepard holding the weapon like a soldier (you can see it in Call of Duty), not swinging it like it is a baby.

Modifié par SNascimento, 11 décembre 2011 - 03:12 .

[RamirezWolfen]

Mesina2 wrote...

JL81 wrote...

This trailer says that ME3 has gone full shooter, and it makes me sad. The original soul of ME is lost for good. ME1 was a RPG with shooter elements. ME2 was a hybrid shooter/cinematic RPG. Here, from what they've shown, they are advertising an over-the-top Gears of War killer shooter with RPG elements. But we'll see if the final product is true to its marketing. I sincerely hope not.

At least, let's hope the story will be satisfying with proper closure for each character.

*sees the Witcher avatar*


Why am I not surprised by this post being full of bollocks then?

You win the "Reply That's full of Win of the Day" Award.

[emanziboy]

Modifié par emanziboy, 11 décembre 2011 - 03:23 .

[PsychoWARD23]

Mesina2 wrote...

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...

Does anyone get a feeling that Brute looks similiar to Ogre from DA1&2 ? I've made this creenshot to show u.

http://img259.images...60/me3brute.png

They looks NOTHING alike.


Not even same size.

They look a little bit alike.

[DarkPsylocke26]

The trailer was amazing, If you don't like what was shown don't play the game.

[alex90c]

JL81 wrote...

This trailer says that ME3 has gone full shooter, and it makes me sad. The original soul of ME is lost for good. ME1 was a RPG with shooter elements. ME2 was a hybrid shooter/cinematic RPG. Here, from what they've shown, they are advertising an over-the-top Gears of War killer shooter with RPG elements. But we'll see if the final product is true to its marketing. I sincerely hope not.

At least, let's hope the story will be satisfying with proper closure for each character.

Uh, what RPG elements have actually been removed since ME1?

[Andorfiend]

So... Why was a giant worm a credible threat to a spaceship? I mean the Reapers can fly, right?

[kregano]

Andorfiend wrote...

So... Why was a giant worm a credible threat to a spaceship? I mean the Reapers can fly, right?

It was on the ground, trying to kill Shepard. Which was a mistake, since spaceships can only kill Shepard when he's in space and utterly powerless.

Also, the Maw was probably moving too slowly for the Reaper's kinetic barriers to activate, allowing it to knock around the Reaper.

[Someone With Mass]

JL81 wrote...

This trailer says that ME3 has gone full shooter, and it makes me sad. The original soul of ME is lost for good. ME1 was a RPG with shooter elements. ME2 was a hybrid shooter/cinematic RPG. Here, from what they've shown, they are advertising an over-the-top Gears of War killer shooter with RPG elements. But we'll see if the final product is true to its marketing. I sincerely hope not.

At least, let's hope the story will be satisfying with proper closure for each character.

If ME1 was an RPG, then it wasn't a very good one. Like, the only thing that held up it's crappy gameplay was the story.

Oh, and by the way. Notice edited footage when you see it.

[PillarBiter]

alex90c wrote...

JL81 wrote...

This trailer says that ME3 has gone full shooter, and it makes me sad. The original soul of ME is lost for good. ME1 was a RPG with shooter elements. ME2 was a hybrid shooter/cinematic RPG. Here, from what they've shown, they are advertising an over-the-top Gears of War killer shooter with RPG elements. But we'll see if the final product is true to its marketing. I sincerely hope not.

At least, let's hope the story will be satisfying with proper closure for each character.

Uh, what RPG elements have actually been removed since ME1?

people who make comments like JL81 just want cluttered screens with the same but didfferent color items (as long as there's plenty!), and ancient-old-none-renewed mechanics.

I fully trust Bioware to deliver me an RPG experience. And if that happens to have mindblowing cinemati experiences? well then, I'll just have to take those too

[Candidate 88766]

SNascimento wrote...
And a negative note: Shepard running animation? Why only Bioware can't see it's bad? They should do Shepard holding the weapon like a soldier (you can see it in Call of Duty), not swinging it like it is a baby.

I'm pretty sure this demo is the same on the press saw ages ago. In every other demo the running animation has been far better.

[Michel1986]

llandwynwyn wrote...

I feel guilty for hunting Thresher Maws in ME1. lol

Yeah, we could use them now .... maybe it has effect on the third game

[BentOrgy]

(Darting it, then leaving before being set on fire.)

Honestly, I'm with the majority of people who are.... Less than amused by the trailer. One of the more simple reasons being; I've played the beta as well.

And nothing, nothing, felt anything remotely immersive. Not once did I feel any reason to care about what was happening. Neither the brief "reunion," with the sexed up new Ashley, nor even the child death meant anything at all; like I was watching a series of disjointed snapshots from random Hollywood summer-flicks, and someone trying to stitch them together.

I realize its beta, but I also know what beta actually means. (I'm a full time student at A.I, majoring in game art and design.) Its a far more complete picture than most want to believe. If it was an alpha build, then I wouldn't be so worried, but it isn't. And this trailer only serves to confirm a large majority of ours fears; that the methodical, mature, almost ethereal Space Opera that Mass Effect 1 was, has been completely forgotten by its creator, and left to die alone in the dark.

We're only a few months away from launch, and it seems to me that Bioware has stretched itself far too thin; trying to cater to new players (The idiots who think jumping on board NOW, in the last title of the series, is a good thing.) and trying to also satisfy people like me, who've been invested since 2006, when Game Informer first released their article.

The result is what I see here; a blatant attempt to capture the popular "Badass space marine kill-em-all humanity r0xx0rz," cliché, with more focus on guns, graphics, and unneeded mechanics, rather than on focusing on the core story, and the core gamers that liked it before it went all heavy metal.

And to the inevitable string of Bioware fanboys and people wanting to be "mature," and "cool," by defending at major company; I (And others like me.) am not "Hating," or "****ing," or whatever you'd like to say to discredit our opinions; I (We.) are simply voicing our opinions, concerns, critiques, and insights regarding a franchise we (At least at one time.) was heavily interested in.

And concerns, critiques, opinions, and insights are what has brought us the games that you love and enjoy; because without them, there never would have been as much innovation as there has been in this industry.

[pmac_tk421]

That. trailer. was... F***ING AMAZING!
@alex90c
Ya I don't see why everyone is whining about RPG mechanics. All they removed in ME2 was the ****ty stuff, like the inventory(since ME1's inventory was terrible, and it's hard to defend.) ME2 was a huge step forward from 1 since it removed the crappy elements and refind the gameplay, story, characters, and RPG systems.

Modifié par pmac_tk421, 11 décembre 2011 - 04:08 .

[DonutsDealer]

EPIC BROS in an EPIC TRAILER, it was HOOOLY SH!T!!!!

[PsychoWARD23]

kregano wrote...

Andorfiend wrote...

So... Why was a giant worm a credible threat to a spaceship? I mean the Reapers can fly, right?

It was on the ground, trying to kill Shepard. Which was a mistake, since spaceships can only kill Shepard when he's in space and utterly powerless.

Also, the Maw was probably moving too slowly for the Reaper's kinetic barriers to activate, allowing it to knock around the Reaper.

Why was it on the ground in the first place?

[Candidate 88766]

PsychoWARD23 wrote...

kregano wrote...

Andorfiend wrote...

So... Why was a giant worm a credible threat to a spaceship? I mean the Reapers can fly, right?

It was on the ground, trying to kill Shepard. Which was a mistake, since spaceships can only kill Shepard when he's in space and utterly powerless.

Also, the Maw was probably moving too slowly for the Reaper's kinetic barriers to activate, allowing it to knock around the Reaper.

Why was it on the ground in the first place?

It was guarding that tower thing (can't wait to find out what that tower is for), and it would take a ridiculous amount of energy for something that size to hover in-atmosphere. far more efficient to land and guard it from there.

Besides, that was one of the smaller ground-based Reapers. The proper Sovereign sized Reapers are the ones that dominate in space, but they need something to attack on the planet's surface.

Modifié par Candidate 88766, 11 décembre 2011 - 04:15 .