Mass Effect 3 - VGA 2011 Trailer
#51
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:48
#52
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:48
If by slapping BioWare logo on Victory Games (which is made of EA Los Angeles who were working on C&C games) you mean BioWare making C&C, then yes. BioWare has now RTS division, but it ain't like anyone from 'core', RPG BioWare (Edmonton, Austin etc) is working on itAdugan wrote...
Lolwut. BW is doing C&C now?
#53
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:48
Adugan wrote...
Derahu wrote...
Remember that BW is with EA right now. The same publisher for C&C 3, Kane's Wrath, Tiberium Twilight, red alert 3, red alert 3 uprising...you see where I'm going with this?Adugan wrote...
Lolwut. BW is doing C&C now?
Yeah, but still. You dont see Bungie making GOW4 or something.
Mainly because Bungie is now an independent studio...
#54
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:48
"HOLY ****!!!!!"
Modifié par Blacklash93, 11 décembre 2011 - 01:49 .
#55
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:49
#56
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:49
.
Unbealivable...
.
now, back to waiting.
#57
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:49
#58
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:50
#59
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:50
Ghost-621 wrote...
At least Bethesda kept their game as what it's has been, and what it's supposed to be. Yay Skyrim.
Sorry, did I miss the part where ME3 has dropped being an RPG for being an RTS?
Gaming hipsters are the worst kind of hipsters.
#60
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:50
#61
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:50
CannonLars wrote...
It wasnt very Mass Effect. More of just a dirty shooter using sci fi as a backdrop. No spaciness, no strange world, no sleek shiny technology, no emphasis on lore and characters and mysterious conversations with synth beats getting your heart rate up, no fog horn sunrise at the end. On the bright side, it is a graphical improvement. Too bad it is all shooter perspective marketing so I can't see the worlds and people and cities that capture the Mass Effect universe where it started. Just a bunch of gritty world-in-flames scenes.
That's pretty much it. I couldn't quite place exactly why I was so unimpressed, but that was it: it could easily have been any shooter game ever produced and I wouldn't have been able to tell the difference.
#62
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:50
Adugan wrote...
Derahu wrote...
Remember that BW is with EA right now. The same publisher for C&C 3, Kane's Wrath, Tiberium Twilight, red alert 3, red alert 3 uprising...you see where I'm going with this?Adugan wrote...
Lolwut. BW is doing C&C now?
Yeah, but still. You dont see Bungie making GOW4 or something.
Because it's not BioWare (as you understand it) that makes this game. It's a former EA LA studio, that got renamed Victory Games, that works on the new C&C title. All they did now is to put BioWare on the cover. BioWare is simply a brand name, nothing more, nothing less.
#63
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:52
#64
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:54
TS2Aggie wrote...
CannonLars wrote...
It wasnt very Mass Effect. More of just a dirty shooter using sci fi as a backdrop. No spaciness, no strange world, no sleek shiny technology, no emphasis on lore and characters and mysterious conversations with synth beats getting your heart rate up, no fog horn sunrise at the end. On the bright side, it is a graphical improvement. Too bad it is all shooter perspective marketing so I can't see the worlds and people and cities that capture the Mass Effect universe where it started. Just a bunch of gritty world-in-flames scenes.
That's pretty much it. I couldn't quite place exactly why I was so unimpressed, but that was it: it could easily have been any shooter game ever produced and I wouldn't have been able to tell the difference.
This.
#65
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:54
#66
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:54
#67
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:54
#68
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:55
#69
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:55
You realize you are making a *** out of your self right? How is this anything like C&C? I see nothing of the kind.Ghost-621 wrote...
Fdingo wrote...
And the marketing continues to suck.
To anyone with a brain and open eyes, yes ME3's marketing certainly does.
EA making Bioware reanimate the C&C series they (EA) killed? This is too hilarious. Way to go and sell yourselves short and out on every turn here, Bioware. Just look at you now.
At least Bethesda kept their game as what it's has been, and what it's supposed to be. Yay Skyrim.
#70
Guest_FemaleMageFan_*
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:55
Guest_FemaleMageFan_*
#71
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:55
#72
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:56
Ghost-621 wrote...
TS2Aggie wrote...
CannonLars wrote...
It wasnt very Mass Effect. More of just a dirty shooter using sci fi as a backdrop. No spaciness, no strange world, no sleek shiny technology, no emphasis on lore and characters and mysterious conversations with synth beats getting your heart rate up, no fog horn sunrise at the end. On the bright side, it is a graphical improvement. Too bad it is all shooter perspective marketing so I can't see the worlds and people and cities that capture the Mass Effect universe where it started. Just a bunch of gritty world-in-flames scenes.
That's pretty much it. I couldn't quite place exactly why I was so unimpressed, but that was it: it could easily have been any shooter game ever produced and I wouldn't have been able to tell the difference.
This.
It was on Tuchanka... What did you expect? Flowers and palm trees?
Yes, I can say this isn't really a trailer but more of a clip from the game.
I think they really should show off the Asari homeworld and those pretty space vistas more often. <_<
#73
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:56
TS2Aggie wrote...
CannonLars wrote...
It wasnt very Mass Effect. More of just a dirty shooter using sci fi as a backdrop. No spaciness, no strange world, no sleek shiny technology, no emphasis on lore and characters and mysterious conversations with synth beats getting your heart rate up, no fog horn sunrise at the end. On the bright side, it is a graphical improvement. Too bad it is all shooter perspective marketing so I can't see the worlds and people and cities that capture the Mass Effect universe where it started. Just a bunch of gritty world-in-flames scenes.
That's pretty much it. I couldn't quite place exactly why I was so unimpressed, but that was it: it could easily have been any shooter game ever produced and I wouldn't have been able to tell the difference.
I will agree with this, though. Unfortunately, it's hard to pack the sort of things we care about into a 30-second trailers meant for a mass audience at a gaming award show. Can't really show lore and characters and "choices with consequence" in that limited time frame. Thus, it's not really directed at us.
Modifié par TheBlackBaron, 11 décembre 2011 - 01:57 .
#74
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:57
TS2Aggie wrote...
CannonLars wrote...
It wasnt very Mass Effect. More of just a dirty shooter using sci fi as a backdrop. No spaciness, no strange world, no sleek shiny technology, no emphasis on lore and characters and mysterious conversations with synth beats getting your heart rate up, no fog horn sunrise at the end. On the bright side, it is a graphical improvement. Too bad it is all shooter perspective marketing so I can't see the worlds and people and cities that capture the Mass Effect universe where it started. Just a bunch of gritty world-in-flames scenes.
That's pretty much it. I couldn't quite place exactly why I was so unimpressed, but that was it: it could easily have been any shooter game ever produced and I wouldn't have been able to tell the difference.
Yes because there was plenty of shooting...
C'mon it was just an action set piece that lasted 2 minutes, if that. I'm glad that there will be moments that break the mold. Keeps things interesting.
#75
Posté 11 décembre 2011 - 01:57





Retour en haut





