604 réponses à ce sujet

[Kaiser Shepard]

FoxHound109 wrote...

ReconTeam wrote...

Hitting a
nerve? Nah, I was just pointing out that you aren't nearly as clever or funny as
you think yourself to be. Sorry if the truth hurts. Come back around when your "argument" is more
than boring .jpegs and .gifs.

So I was right then?

*snip*

No, I was, as usual:

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

What, you're expecting him to conform to a more mature norm than the one of that certain imageboard I'm sure he frequents?

[jlb524]

Kaiser Shepard wrote...
There only was one fallacy, and that was Jlb's replacing X with a completely unrelated commodity..

Do you know what an analogy is?

Yes, getting to ride a bus isn't the same thing as picking an option to romance a character in a video game but it's all about the similarities in the relationship between the comparison and... why do I bother.

[PinkDiamondstl]

Ferris95 wrote...

This thread.

Still here I see.

[Abispa]

Now for something that is far more important that the "discussion" on this thread. Do you think the Lions will actually win their first play-off game in more than a decade? I don't know myself, since they only just beat the Raiders by one point. They were 14 points down at the start of the last quarter, so I guess they MAY be able to beat their first play off opponent.

[Kaiser Arian XVII]

Ah, this pathetic thread again. we have already dismissed this claim ...

[MACharlie1]

Are we discussing s/s romances anymore or each others maturity? Because the "conversation" about the former is far more interesting.

[Sundance31us]

The thought that someone can be so insecure about their sexuality that a s/s option on a dialogue wheel can be a threat is...disappointing. <_<

[PinkDiamondstl]

Are we still talking about Mass Effect 3? Or Vega? Same-sex being removed?I don't know anymore.

[Youknow]

Ferris95 wrote...

This thread.

Yes. Yes it is. 

[slimgrin]

Sundance31us wrote...

The thought that someone can be so insecure about their sexuality that a s/s option on a dialogue wheel can be a threat is...disappointing. <_<

This is precisely the type of generic counter argument I've come to accept. One completely devoid of thought.

Modifié par slimgrin, 19 décembre 2011 - 05:38 .

[Inquisitor Recon]

IsaacShep wrote...
And most people take looks into consideration. None of LIs do that. Ohh and most women don't date guys who beat other women for no reason. Yeah and most people take morals into account and won't date someone who's morality is complete opposite to his/her. And of course the number of men so handsome and attractive to have 90% of his female co-workers/cubordinates/classmates be into him is probably way smaller than the number of gay people in society.

So, you were talking about real-life examples of realism being applied to ME romances?

Oddly enough, none of that pointed out any reason why Bioware should make everybody bisexual.

It would be some awfully wacky logic if you were suggesting that should make everybody bisexual because ME doesn't take into account how ugly or pretty Shepard is. One flaw doesn't justify another.

Modifié par ReconTeam, 19 décembre 2011 - 05:36 .

[Kaiser Shepard]

jlb524 wrote...

Kaiser Shepard wrote...
There only was one fallacy, and that was Jlb's replacing X with a completely unrelated commodity..

Do you know what an analogy is?

Yes, getting to ride a bus isn't the same thing as picking an option to romance a character in a video game but it's all about the similarities in the relationship between the comparison and... why do I bother.

The analogy itself still has to make some sense, dear.

[Kaiser Arian XVII]

jlb524 wrote...

Yes, getting to ride a bus isn't the same thing as picking an option to romance a character in a video game but it's all about the similarities in the relationship between the comparison and... why do I bother.

The logic of numbers without consideration of social, historical and natural facts. That is why I despise Mathematics.

[Ryzaki]

That gif always makes me feel a little sick. I know it's not real but...

[Draco Knight 77]

WHAT IS RETCON !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[PinkDiamondstl]

 https://encrypted-tb...jk6i5g1aif73zjQ
I mean really bro...

[Kawamura]

ReconTeam wrote...

Oddly enough, none of that pointed out any reason why Bioware should make everybody bisexual.

To give the most options available to all people playing?

[MACharlie1]

slimgrin wrote...

Sundance31us wrote...

The thought that someone can be so insecure about their sexuality that a s/s option on a dialogue wheel can be a threat is...disappointing. <_<

This is precisley the type of generic counter argument I've come to accept. One completely devoid of thought.

OOooo! I get to bring in some of my research from a term paper I wrote this semester.

A-hem. Studies have proven, based on penile circumfrence, that men who dislike homosexuals were far more stimulated (as in, the circumfrence of their penis increased) when viewing intimacy between two males then men who didn't dislike homosexuals. Want the citation? 

[slimgrin]

MACharlie1 wrote...

slimgrin wrote...

Sundance31us wrote...

The thought that someone can be so insecure about their sexuality that a s/s option on a dialogue wheel can be a threat is...disappointing. <_<

This is precisley the type of generic counter argument I've come to accept. One completely devoid of thought.

OOooo! I get to bring in some of my research from a term paper I wrote this semester.

A-hem. Studies have proven, based on penile circumfrence, that men who dislike homosexuals were far more stimulated (as in, the circumfrence of their penis increased) when viewing intimacy between two males then men who didn't dislike homosexuals. Want the citation? 

Real world > term paper.

[Inquisitor Recon]

Kawamura wrote...
To give the most options available to all people playing?

And screw over most players who like some depth of character in the process?

This thread makes zombie Kim Jung-il mad.

[MACharlie1]

slimgrin wrote...

MACharlie1 wrote...

slimgrin wrote...

Sundance31us wrote...

The thought that someone can be so insecure about their sexuality that a s/s option on a dialogue wheel can be a threat is...disappointing. <_<

This is precisley the type of generic counter argument I've come to accept. One completely devoid of thought.

OOooo! I get to bring in some of my research from a term paper I wrote this semester.

A-hem. Studies have proven, based on penile circumfrence, that men who dislike homosexuals were far more stimulated (as in, the circumfrence of their penis increased) when viewing intimacy between two males then men who didn't dislike homosexuals. Want the citation? 

Real world > term paper.

Research. 

Hudepohi, Adam, Parrott
Dominic, and Amos Zeichner. "Heterosexual Men's Anger in Response to Male
Homosexuality: Effects of Erotic and Non- Erotic Depictions of Male-Male
Intimacy and Sexual Prejudice." Journal of Homosexuality. 57.8
(2010): 1022-1038. Print.

Do understand that I don't - I simply can't - come up with conclusions out of thin air when writing my papers since - y'know - i actually care about my education. 

Modifié par MACharlie1, 19 décembre 2011 - 05:42 .

[Kawamura]

slimgrin wrote...

MACharlie1 wrote...

slimgrin wrote...

Sundance31us wrote...

The thought that someone can be so insecure about their sexuality that a s/s option on a dialogue wheel can be a threat is...disappointing. <_<

This is precisley the type of generic counter argument I've come to accept. One completely devoid of thought.

OOooo! I get to bring in some of my research from a term paper I wrote this semester.

A-hem. Studies have proven, based on penile circumfrence, that men who dislike homosexuals were far more stimulated (as in, the circumfrence of their penis increased) when viewing intimacy between two males then men who didn't dislike homosexuals. Want the citation? 

Real world > term paper.

While I don't approve of the use of the word "proven", things like studies exist so  we can try to get the big picture each of us as individuals is incapable of finding out on our own. Yes?

Well. And to get funding.