[quote]Lazy Jer wrote...
I'm not doubting whether or not Alrik did what he did. The implication was quiet clear. Clear enough that I have no doubt that he was doing it. What I'm saying is that I don't think anyone else knew. His actions weren't being hidden by other members of the Templar Order, because they didn't know. It's the entire reason he went after the Tranquil. He knew that, without emotions, they would "do whatever he asked." It's the entire reason why I wanted to raise the character from the dead in game so I could kill him again.[/quote]
I know. I'm saying there's so much abuse and corruption going on in the Kirkwall Order that I find the notion Elthina didn't know there was some Abu Ghraib **** going down there to be downright laughable.
[quote]This is probably something I'm going to need to read up on in the codexes (which I tend to skip), or get further along in DA:Assunder before commenting further on. But what I'm saying is that I don't think Elthina herself was dangling lyruim over the heads of the Temps.[/quote]
She should have been.
[quote]Regarding the dog anaology, the difference is that a vicious attack dog lacks the requisite intelligence to be held accountable for it's actions. Knight-Commander Meredeth isn't a dog. She is a human being and needs to be held more accountable for the problems in Kirkwall then Elthina. The direct fault needs to go to Meredeth, whereas Elthina's fault is indirect.[/quote]
Oh I'm certainly not absolving Meredith. Good God, no. I can't even talk about what punishment I think Meredith should endure because this is a PG forum. I'm just talking about Elthina instead because nobody is questioning Meredith's evil.
[quote]That comment of hers about magic allowing abuses beyond the scope of morals is the entire basis of the debate on the neccessity or lack thereof of the Circle/Templar system. What she's saying there is that one mage has the ability to melt the faces of an entire village of non-mages if they so choose. The Chantry takes a lot of flack for it's possition on magic and mages, but let's face it, mages can be dangerous.[/quote]
Depends upon the size of the village. Connor seemed to be a unique case if for no other reason than mankind wouldn't have survived the stone age if that kind of thing wasn't incredibly rare. But either way, magic is of course dangerous. The Chantry's solution (especially in Kirkwall) is like burning down your house to get rid of a stain your new puppy left on the carpet. Beyond being a massive over-reaction, they're punishing people (and very harshly) for merely being capable of crimes. Crimes that others have committed. They're okay with punishing mages like Bethany for the crimes of others, so I'm okay with punishing grand clerics like Elthina for the crimes of her templars.
[quote]Ironically the first time I heard the term was while watching a Richard Pryor flick.[/quote]
... It still enrages me to think how they ruined Superman III by making it about Pryor's character.

[quote] It's not an unreasonable leap of faith to assume that Alrik may have managed to keep this from anyone, Templar and mage alike.[/quote]
Yeah, it kind of is. One scene that immediately pops to mind is a random background banter between two nameless NPCs in the Gallows. Some mage was extremely relieved to find the woman he loves was back after having been missing for a bit. And then, extremely horrified when she responds in the lifeless, monotone voice of a tranquil. He laments the loss and she ends the banter saying, "I belong only to Ser Alrik now."
Considering how much of mediating Elthina supposedly does with Meredith and Orsino, how would she not know about the rampant abuses? Not all of them, there's too many to know them all. If this wasn't a game (i.e. what we don't see doesn't exist) I'd say we probably don't even know a fraction of it. Seriously, if she investigated by interviewing random mages in private and such (or even just trying to verify the tranquility rites' legality), it'd be impossible for the templars to hide the fact that the Gallows is, well, what it is. So either she knew, or she didn't bother with any investigation because she was really in Meredith's camp and just wanted to save face by feigning neutrality. ... And I'm not really sure what the difference is, come to think of it.
[quote] We could just as easily say that Cullen was "responsible for" Meredeth because he was close enough to see her methods but didn't bring it up to Elthina, or that Orsino was responsible for Meredeth because when he managed to get in her presence he didn't specifically say what she was doing and didn't ask for Elthina to investigate or recall Meredeth. [/quote]
Sounds good to me. I don't view Cullen as anything but another scumbag fascist anyway. No, he wasn't a rapist or torturer, but an 'honest' fascist is still a fascist.
[quote]There is a difference though. Elthina is Meredeth's boss and actually could have done something to stop her. Meredeth was beginning to lose her mind once she got her hands on that there idol. She was mentally unstable and no longer capable of being solely responsible of her actions. Even if she was sane, it is Elthinas job to replace her when she goes to far(which she did). She did nothing. If an employee was sexually harassing or physically abusing another employee, the boss is responsible to fix the problem immediately. Or a cop stopping a mugging(as someone else has brought up before). Elthina has that authority. She didn't use it.[/quote]
Fun fact: Elthina is the one who appointed Meredith in the first place. And it was after the incident with her sister that turned her into a murderous psychotic.
[quote]GavrielKay wrote...
Alrik suggested destroying the personality of every mage in the circle - in his own words to his superior and her superior. It shouldn't have taken much to convince either of them that someone who was willing to mind-rape all mages would be willing to bodily rape a few pretty women.[/quote]
I kind of wonder if Ella should be called a woman. Bethany, at a ripe old age of 18, referred to her as a kid. How old could she have been? I suppose given Alrik's crimes a charge of child molestion wouldn't change anything, but... *shudder*
[quote]The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
Seriously? They murdered a bunch of Redcliffe soldiers and set up impostors all over Ferelden just to keep tabs on who sought out the ashes. They even threatened the owner of the Spoiled Princess near Lake Calenhad.[/quote]
I didn't say they were nice people, I said they seemed sane to me. They acted logically for their goal and had a firm grasp of reality (aside from their beliefs on the dragon, but religion always requires some degree of blind faith). Evil? Sure. Insane? Nah.
[quote]GavrielKay wrote...
Hawke should have been able to tell someone.[/quote]
Maybe, but remember the mother of all facepalms where a pro-templar Hawke tells Cullen about Anders' Chantry plotting and Cullen says 'don't worry about it, we're on it.' and then everything plays out like the conversation never happened?