Filament wrote...
Your point one is attacking a strawman, because I never said I believed his explanation or yours. I'm merely acknowledging both as possibilities. You're not.
Swing and a miss. "crash the party with facts" With facts. This more than slightly implies that you believe that scenario to be the case. Now sure, you could say I'm just making a false assumption based on possibly poor wording. Except the only one that's doing that is you. Notice how my original post said "I think TEWR was dead on"? Think. I acknowledged the possibility that I was mistaken.
You can go on believing whatever you want with no evidence whatsoever, I won't stop you. Though I'm curious what kind of "scrunity" is involved that makes you the magnificent mindreader you are, who can say with such certainty what he meant even despite the limitations of text you mentioned yourself, and despite that, again, there is no true certainty outside of his own head on this matter.
Looking back, it's pretty funny how much you're overreacting about my supposedly adamant belief of "I think..." Thanks for the chuckle.
Unsurprising that you would think that of yourself.
Everyone thinks they're right pretty much all the time and no matter how poor a case they're making for their side. That's just the way the human mind works. It (depressingly) skips right over "could I be wrong?" and goes straight to "what can I say to defend my position?". But I digress.... I was merely mocking what I thought was a bad attempt at a clever phrase.
Still want to play more word games? This is fun.





Retour en haut





