Well as I said I am not unreasonable. And what made me change my opinion was mostly Shepard's choice of words. 'Save the Council at all costs'. There are theories around that still give him a good reason to save the Council. Based on the assumption that Sovereign could only open the relay with Saren's help, which is why he revived Saren after (in my playthrough) Saren commited suicide. But honestly, the idea that Sovereign could not open the relay without someone helping him seems ... questionable, he is a Reaper, why should they build the citadel in a way that they need a third party to activate one of their own relays? Just to give the galaxy a chance to stop them? Also Shepard's choice of words suggests at this point he really was going to risk Sovereign to succeed. Because 'at all costs' means for me that he'd sacrifice everything to save the Council. But instead he should sacrifice everything to stop the Reapers. Even the Council if need be. Because Shepard's the only one at this point who knows/believes that there is a Reaper fleet in darkspace waiting to return. While everyone else seems to think that Sovereign is a Geth ship.Lotion Soronnar wrote...
.. I think the decision to ignore Sovereing and save the Council first is what I would call 'ruthless idealistic'. As in idealistic to a point to sacrifice everyone and everything for your ideals.
And this is why I called THAT paragon decision egoistcial.
Ya, that was me, not Luc0s - just to clear that up.Btw I am not getting angry either. But I can get defensive. Especially
if you jump in the fray like that when I am already having a heated
discussion with Lotion. And boy, Lotion can tick me off like no other. ../../../images/forum/emoticons/wink.png
The sentimenet is mutual dear Sir.
I am however pleased at this recent 180°. There's hope for ya yet:wizard:
We are still in disagreement on the Collector Base though
Modifié par AlexXIV, 30 décembre 2011 - 10:21 .





Retour en haut





