android654 wrote...
Kid Buu wrote...
android654 wrote...
King Minos wrote...
Miser JB, I'm basing my opinion on the fact that Garrus was a squad in ME1 and we learned about his past and views, then he was a squad member in ME2 and we learned of his adventures and his history when Shepard was dead. Once again he will be a squad member and due to this, I believe he will have even more backstory and a deeper personality. I think the ME 2 squadmembers will get shafted like the Me1 squad, but that is my opinion.
But the ME1 squad didn't get shafted, they got 2 games, and some of them got 3 to explore their stories. So no one got shafted as bad as the ME2 squad mates, even if they were the better written and more interesting of the first 2.
Completely opinionated.
Rather factual since the majority were written to accentuate the organizations around them or tie in directly to conflicts that were glimsped in ME1, In ME1 the VS, Garrus, and Wrex have well written back stories and Dialogue. Liara still sounds overwhelmingly immature and most of her dialogue refernces the protheans, asari culture and the bit of flirting with Shepard, Tali only talks about the quarians, the flotilla and comparissons between it and the Normandy. Everyone on the SR2 has conetent relevant to them as individuals, their past associations, excluding Grunt since he's a new born. That's an unfortunate effect of being the first game a lot of the characters have to establish the world around them, ME2 doesn't have that problem, therefore more time could be redirected to the characters.
So more care was placed on their writing. Fact.
Omg. More care does not mean BETTER. Most of the dialogue from the characters in ME2 are little different in that they are slightly informative and then completely usesless unless a LI. Funny, all the characters seem to be that way in ME1 as well. And what? Did you EVER talk to Tali in ME1? Because everything you said is wrong. She does talk about herself, and more importantly the geth, who were the main enemies in ME1. Therefor she alone was more useful than say.. Thane or Samara, the latter of which has no personality. The only reason it appears that ME2 had better characters is because there were more and the game was based around them.
lets look at this:
Samara is just an emotionless killer that thinks shes in the right.
Grunt is just a Krogan. Really, there is nothing special about him, other than he is suppsoe to be `pure` (whatever that means)
Jack is a cliche` emotionally disturbed person with a violent past.
Mordin is a genius that has some moral issues with things hes done.
Ect.
On top of being about as depth as the characters in ME1 for the most part, none of the squad mates contribute anything to the story other than Mordin. You could say that building the team to fight the reapers was the goal, but how is that anything less than what the ME1 squad was?
Now the characters werent bad in ME2, and dont get me wrong, I liked Thane. However, most of them had the same, if not, less depth than the characters in ME1. A few had good characterization, but not all.
Modifié par Kid Buu, 30 décembre 2011 - 04:33 .