5 réponses à ce sujet

[Looy]

I was just wondering if there is any reason to roll a warrior archer over a rogue archer. The rogues talents seem much more usefull for archery.

[Looy]

Bump

[ComTrav]

The main reason to do so seems to be to take different specializations.



Berserker PROBABLY works for adding to archery damage, but I don't know for sure. And I feel like a Templar archer would really wreck enemy casters.

[Scyles]

Archery is an excellent skill for a warrior to pick up without committing himself to the "archer" role. Dual wield and sword and shield style warriors already have a fair amount of dexterity to work with. Archery puts it to further use.

Just taking the bottom branch of archery for Rapid Shot and Scattering Shot will make your warrior more dynamic. He'll be able to injure targets from afar, and pull off a great AOE stun before switching to melee and taking advantage of his stunned opponents.

Modifié par Scyles, 25 novembre 2009 - 08:22 .

[DrekorSilverfang]

You'd need the dex hotfix since you wouldn't have lethality, no real reason why it wouldn't work out though. Certainly rogues would do better but you can still be successful on a warrior.

[ComTrav]

You don't lethality--as a warrior it makes sense to just flat out pump strength.



You may want the dex hotfix anyway as it overall makes archery better.