Cthulhu42 wrote...
AgitatedLemon wrote...
Face it; Garrus may be one of my favourite squadmates, but he's about as plot-relevant as a rock. He could easily be written out of the trilogy and very little would change.
And Tali can't?
Any squadmate could, presumably, but some more easily than others (Liara being probably the most difficult). Tali is the one who uncovers the evidence against Saren in ME1, and is important in the whole geth/quarian plotline. Garrus has none of that going for him.
I also find it funny how some people whine and complain about Tali's "favouritism" and such yet put up no fuss about Garrus's, despite the fact that he's gotten similar treatment.
Tali isn't relevant to the Geth/Quarian war, her father is. Yes she's relevant to the ME1 plot, but she brings nothing to ME2 and I'm going to wager even less to ME3.
Garrus is fair game, especially since you can bypass his recruitment in ME1. While he had interesting things to say in ME1 and had the student/teacher dynamic with Shepard, he brings
nothing to the ME2 dynamic. No dialogue and a paper thin story that stopped being interesting the second you find out he's archangel. His story could've been so much more if he denied your request to join his team and went off to rebuild his vigilante army, only seeking your help for his LM and then disapear until ME3 when he returns with a fleet of vigilantes who are hardened badasses determined to delivering Justice to Cerberus.
Liara has no point ot being a part of the ME3 team since she got a huge chunk of ME2 dedicated to getting her her own army. Putting her on the Normandy makes that pointless. What's the point of her bieng the Shadow Broker if she's not going to use her resources to fight as our ally?