5 réponses à ce sujet

[Morroian]

Nice article at Kotaku

http://kotaku.com/58...ge-ii--you-know 

And another nice article on the game linked to in the Kotaku article:

http://www.your-crit...ragedie-of.html 

[John Epler]

You know, I'm going to suggest that if you're not planning on arguing in good faith, that you should, perhaps, take a break from the forums.

There's nothing wrong with illustrating the problems you have with DA2. I've always argued that people should feel free to share their opinions, whether positive or negative, and that it's only through criticism that we're able to grow as developers and ensure that our future products are of a higher quality.

But 'good faith' is the key. Taking the worst examples (or, to be fair, the best examples) and saying 'this is truly representative of the quality of the game as a whole' is not good faith.

Modifié par JohnEpler, 12 janvier 2012 - 06:12 .

[John Epler]

And while I'm here, let's let the idea that 'people who didn't like DA2 just wanted more of DA:O' die. It's unfairly homogenizing what is a rather diverse group, and certainly doesn't lead to any sort of constructive discussion.

@Am1_vf - I'm an English major, and so wrote an unhealthy number of papers in university. Learning to communicate effectively and clearly is something I had to do fairly early on so that they wouldn't just laugh me out of academia.

[John Epler]

Let's try and be civil, folks. Calling people ignorant is not being civil.

One and only warning.

[John Epler]

Marionetten wrote...

Not everyone hates Big Rigs either.

And all those reviews seem entirely serious, too!

I think I made a point about arguing in good faith earlier in this thread. It's still valid.

[John Epler]

And we're done.

Those who felt it might be a good idea to break out the insults, well, you'll have 24 hours to reconsider that.