austinsj82 wrote...
Mesina2 wrote...
Emoking wrote...
wolfsite wrote...
So you are saying I shouldn't trust EA cause they are EA....... ya geat logic.
I believe EA's stance since it does make sense, and they have shown proof of it and there intentions that they would like to continue dealing with Valve.
Valve has said.......... nothing, and when you say nothing to defend your stance that normally implies that there is truth is what the other side, in this case EA, has stated.
I'm saying that EA is monopolistic in its attitudes to DLC. And that trusting a monopolistic company when it says "We'd like to sell our products other places" is a bit foolish (not that you are foolish, just it's not a very wise thing to do).
Also, Steam haven't replied because they don't tend to get involved in business arguments. Just like they don't tend to publicize sales figures. Though I do admire your logic that says "just because someone doesn't deny something, doesn't mean that it is right". <_<
So wait, EA shouldn't be allow to do whatever the hell they want with their own DLC's?
While Valve, in other hand, can be monopolistic and do whatever the hell they want with other business's stuff?
I smell Valve/Steam fanboyism here.
Yes they should, and they already do with the ME1, ME2 and DA:O DLC and yet they continue to be available for sale on steam.
ME1/2 and DA:O were released before the new contract was signed, with the new ToS.
www.destructoid.com/steam-yanks-dragon-age-ii-may-not-be-origin-related-207166.phtml
Modifié par Emoking, 14 janvier 2012 - 04:25 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




