Its not nearly as bad anywhere else.
You ever heard of a company called Apple?
Its not nearly as bad anywhere else.
photographerleia wrote...
izmirtheastarach wrote...
Okay, but that applies to all digital products. Ebooks, Games, Movies anything you get off of the net. However none of that is doable with retail product. Once I have a product in my home, no one can actually take it from me. So why isn't the solution to just get a retail product?
Because the retail product (which is what I WOULD be buying) requires downloading the Origin client as well. You would expect using the client is you bought the game from the Origin Store. Having to install the client when you buy retail, however, is unacceptable.
Icinix wrote...
The retail product still requires it.
Modifié par izmirtheastarach, 15 janvier 2012 - 02:43 .
strive wrote...
Its not nearly as bad anywhere else.
You ever heard of a company called Apple?
Moondoggie wrote...
photographerleia wrote...
Because the retail product (which is what I WOULD be buying) requires downloading the Origin client as well. You would expect using the client is you bought the game from the Origin Store. Having to install the client when you buy retail, however, is unacceptable.
Same with Steam which is bundled with many retail versions of the most popular games out there. Why is it acceptable for Valve to do it and not EA?
Still here, but slowly sliding ......anzolino wrote...
I never doubt it... actually... sometimes... maybe... ok, you win.Ashertron wrote...
>Implying EA would ever tell the truth.
kofelover, are you there? Or just shocked sliding under the table?
Incognito JC wrote...
Ryzaki wrote...
They force Origin on the retail version as well.Believe me I was planning on buying the boxed copy. This crap comes with it too.
I'm not sure if I should yell or cry.
I might just get a friend to buy the PC version then play it on their PC
Modifié par Ryzaki, 15 janvier 2012 - 02:45 .
Moondoggie wrote...
photographerleia wrote...
Because the retail product (which is what I WOULD be buying) requires downloading the Origin client as well. You would expect using the client is you bought the game from the Origin Store. Having to install the client when you buy retail, however, is unacceptable.
Same with Steam which is bundled with many retail versions of the most popular games out there. Why is it acceptable for Valve to do it and not EA?
Modifié par photographerleia, 15 janvier 2012 - 02:46 .
Icinix wrote...
Moondoggie wrote...
photographerleia wrote...
Because the retail product (which is what I WOULD be buying) requires downloading the Origin client as well. You would expect using the client is you bought the game from the Origin Store. Having to install the client when you buy retail, however, is unacceptable.
Same with Steam which is bundled with many retail versions of the most popular games out there. Why is it acceptable for Valve to do it and not EA?
*raises hand*
Actually I've been complaining about Valve doing it since Half Life 2.
To this day I have not purchased Half Life 2.
Moondoggie wrote...
photographerleia wrote...
Because the retail product (which is what I WOULD be buying) requires downloading the Origin client as well. You would expect using the client is you bought the game from the Origin Store. Having to install the client when you buy retail, however, is unacceptable.
Same with Steam which is bundled with many retail versions of the most popular games out there. Why is it acceptable for Valve to do it and not EA?
Ponendus wrote...
I am very confused... I haven't solidified an opinion, I would love is someone could take the time to clarify where the debate is currently at? Thanks in advance.
Modifié par Alex_SM, 15 janvier 2012 - 02:47 .
That's perfectly reasonable, I can respect that.photographerleia wrote...
Moondoggie wrote...
photographerleia wrote...
Because the retail product (which is what I WOULD be buying) requires downloading the Origin client as well. You would expect using the client is you bought the game from the Origin Store. Having to install the client when you buy retail, however, is unacceptable.
Same with Steam which is bundled with many retail versions of the most popular games out there. Why is it acceptable for Valve to do it and not EA?
Check out the last reply I made to you regarding Steam when you posed a similar question. I take issue with Steam to and, as a result, do not buy from them (or buy retail games requiring Steam) either.
Icinix wrote...
*raises hand*
Actually I've been complaining about Valve doing it since Half Life 2.
To this day I have not purchased Half Life 2.
izmirtheastarach wrote...
Icinix wrote...
The retail product still requires it.
I understand that. But since I have a physical copy of the game, no one can stop me from playing it. It's not like Origin is some magic solution that will break into my home and remove the game and destroy the disc. Circumventing DRM is illegal in the US, so I guess legally US consumer are stuck. I suppose I can't argue with that.
Alex_SM wrote...
Ponendus wrote...
I am very confused... I haven't solidified an opinion, I would love is someone could take the time to clarify where the debate is currently at? Thanks in advance.
Data mining:
Steam:
Disabled by default.
User must enable it manually.
Has not been caught looking for files outside its own folder.
Origin:
Enabled by default.
User can't disable it (seems that it would be possible with ME3, but still unclear if it really stops all the data mining or just the bits related to BW).
Has been repeatidly caught looking for files outside its own folder and changing its properties.
There are also some reports claiming it is able to breach sandboxing (unverifiable).
Icinix wrote...
It still requires Origin - so unless you spend the rest of your life without the internet on your computer and without ever needing to do an ME3 install - they can take the game away from you.
Modifié par izmirtheastarach, 15 janvier 2012 - 02:48 .
Alex_SM wrote...
Origin:
Has been repeatidly caught looking for files outside its own folder and changing its properties.
There are also some reports claiming it is able to breach sandboxing (unverifiable).
izmirtheastarach wrote...
Having principles is great, but this is the very definition of cutting off your nose to spite your face. Denying yourself access to the final chapter of a great trilogy of games to make some sort of point just seems crazy to me. Especially since EA doesn't care about your point at all. It will not impact their bottom line one iota.
izmirtheastarach wrote...
Having principles is great, but this is the very definition of cutting off your nose to spite your face. Denying yourself access to the final chapter of a great trilogy of games to make some sort of point just seems crazy to me. Especially since EA doesn't care about your point at all. It will not impact their bottom line one iota.
Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 15 janvier 2012 - 02:48 .
Easy Steam doesn't intrude on my computer and threaten to ban me if I sneeze in a way they don't approve.
Modifié par strive, 15 janvier 2012 - 02:50 .