Aller au contenu

Photo

Xbox 360 Disk Swapping


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
165 réponses à ce sujet

#26
SavesTheDay

SavesTheDay
  • Members
  • 315 messages

Rojahar wrote...

I'm pretty sure disc swapping is the closest thing to exercise that some of the people complaining about it get.


HAHA That's my favorite stereotype!





:whistle:

#27
Firesteel

Firesteel
  • Members
  • 488 messages
Everything in Skyrim is in engine and in real time. Cutscenes take up some of the largest parts of a game due to their pre-rendered nature. If everything in ME happened in real time, the size would be much smaller, as AI behaviors and reactions are part of classes and the main program, not something that must be added to the program and triggered.

#28
Guest_Tigerblood and MilkShakes_*

Guest_Tigerblood and MilkShakes_*
  • Guests
this thread again, are you people so lazy you cant change a disk it takes five seconds gezzz.i hope ME3 is Five disc just so you have to get up and change it

#29
Guest_Luc0s_*

Guest_Luc0s_*
  • Guests

Bogsnot1 wrote...

Luc0s wrote...

Mass Effect Player wrote...

Disk swapping only happened at specific moments. It's not that bad, its a big after all. Curious did Skyrim of have disk swapping.


Skyrim is only 3,5GB big and fits on 1 disk.

Yet Skyrim has an gigantic open-world, an insane amount of NPCs, an insane amount of quests and 100+ hours of gameplay.

So yeah, go figure....


With an insane amount of recycled assets. You thought ME's "prefab shack/corridors" were bad. Pay more attention to Skyrim next time you play it.


No, that's Oblivion you talk about. I think you saw Oblivion for Skyrim and mixed them up. ;)


Skyrim doesn't have much more recycled stuff than Mass Effect 2 does. And even minus all the recycled stuff, Skyrim is still bigger than ME2. All the capital cities together in Skyrim (each capital city being unique and different) are bigger than all of ME2's area's together. And Skyrim is still only 3,5GB while ME2 is 15GB. Go figure.

#30
Guest_Luc0s_*

Guest_Luc0s_*
  • Guests

Firesteel7 wrote...

Everything in Skyrim is in engine and in real time. Cutscenes take up some of the largest parts of a game due to their pre-rendered nature. If everything in ME happened in real time, the size would be much smaller, as AI behaviors and reactions are part of classes and the main program, not something that must be added to the program and triggered.


Everything in Mass Effect does happen in real-time actually, even the cutscenes. They're all rendered in-game, except for a very very few (such as the loading screens).

So cutscenes is not a valid argument. It's not the reason why Mass Effect 2 is so much bigger in file-size.

#31
Guest_Catch This Fade_*

Guest_Catch This Fade_*
  • Guests

Luc0s wrote...

Bogsnot1 wrote...

Luc0s wrote...

Mass Effect Player wrote...

Disk swapping only happened at specific moments. It's not that bad, its a big after all. Curious did Skyrim of have disk swapping.


Skyrim is only 3,5GB big and fits on 1 disk.

Yet Skyrim has an gigantic open-world, an insane amount of NPCs, an insane amount of quests and 100+ hours of gameplay.

So yeah, go figure....


With an insane amount of recycled assets. You thought ME's "prefab shack/corridors" were bad. Pay more attention to Skyrim next time you play it.


No, that's Oblivion you talk about. I think you saw Oblivion for Skyrim and mixed them up. ;)


Skyrim doesn't have much more recycled stuff than Mass Effect 2 does. And even minus all the recycled stuff, Skyrim is still bigger than ME2. All the capital cities together in Skyrim (each capital city being unique and different) are bigger than all of ME2's area's together. And Skyrim is still only 3,5GB while ME2 is 15GB. Go figure.

Considering the lack of detail Skyrim has minus any pre rendered cutscenes and I'm not suprised how easy it was to compress down to 3.5 gb. The environment looks worse than Oblivion in some cases.

#32
Guest_The PLC_*

Guest_The PLC_*
  • Guests
Doesn't bother me.

#33
KenKenpachi

KenKenpachi
  • Members
  • 5 768 messages
Oh noes I might have to get up in like...4-5 hours and replace a disk! To....much....work....tell....my wife....I love her....and....bring....me mountain dew...

#34
Guest_SkyeHawk89_*

Guest_SkyeHawk89_*
  • Guests
I don't mind it, alit of people are just la y. It liked that line in that movie, people are too lazy and fat. It's true, I'm not trying to offend I'm just saying. I have some titles that's on more than one disc. I'm okay with it. The more the better, the less is the crappier.

#35
Firesteel

Firesteel
  • Members
  • 488 messages

Luc0s wrote...

Bogsnot1 wrote...

Luc0s wrote...

Mass Effect Player wrote...

Disk swapping only happened at specific moments. It's not that bad, its a big after all. Curious did Skyrim of have disk swapping.


Skyrim is only 3,5GB big and fits on 1 disk.

Yet Skyrim has an gigantic open-world, an insane amount of NPCs, an insane amount of quests and 100+ hours of gameplay.

So yeah, go figure....


With an insane amount of recycled assets. You thought ME's "prefab shack/corridors" were bad. Pay more attention to Skyrim next time you play it.


No, that's Oblivion you talk about. I think you saw Oblivion for Skyrim and mixed them up. ;)


Skyrim doesn't have much more recycled stuff than Mass Effect 2 does. And even minus all the recycled stuff, Skyrim is still bigger than ME2. All the capital cities together in Skyrim (each capital city being unique and different) are bigger than all of ME2's area's together. And Skyrim is still only 3,5GB while ME2 is 15GB. Go figure.

It is for two big reasons:
No cutscenes period, having the AI have set behaviors for specific points in game takes up very little space, it is just extra functions onto that specific character's class.
No voice for PC. Audio files take up large amounts of space as well, and cutting down costs.

#36
Guest_Luc0s_*

Guest_Luc0s_*
  • Guests

Firesteel7 wrote...

It is for two big reasons:
No cutscenes period, having the AI have set behaviors for specific points in game takes up very little space, it is just extra functions onto that specific character's class.
No voice for PC. Audio files take up large amounts of space as well, and cutting down costs.


Read my previous post. Not cut-scenes is not a valid argument because ME2 doesn't have cut-scenes either and it's way bigger.

It's true that Mass Effect has more dialogue, so that's probably taking a lot of space. Skyrim has less dialogue, so less space taken up by that.


But in the end, I take Bethesda's word on it that they're just the compression masters. They said the just found a really good and solid way of compressing their games and I believe that. I think Bethesda is just a little better at compression than anyone else (at the moment).

Modifié par Luc0s, 15 janvier 2012 - 02:22 .


#37
Guest_Luc0s_*

Guest_Luc0s_*
  • Guests

jreezy wrote...

Considering the lack of detail Skyrim has minus any pre rendered cutscenes and I'm not suprised how easy it was to compress down to 3.5 gb. The environment looks worse than Oblivion in some cases.


Lack of detail? Are you kidding me?

Sure, the textures in Skyrim are horrible, but you can't possibly say Skyrim lacks detail. The world is full with little props and assets that really makes the world believable and realistic!


If only those textures were not so damn low-res...

#38
Firesteel

Firesteel
  • Members
  • 488 messages

Luc0s wrote...

Firesteel7 wrote...

It is for two big reasons:
No cutscenes period, having the AI have set behaviors for specific points in game takes up very little space, it is just extra functions onto that specific character's class.
No voice for PC. Audio files take up large amounts of space as well, and cutting down costs.


Read my previous post. Not cut-scenes is not a valid argument because ME2 doesn't have cut-scenes either and it's way bigger.

It's true that Mass Effect has more dialogue, so that's probably taking a lot of space. Skyrim has less dialogue, so less space taken up by that.


But in the end, I take Bethesda's word on it that they're just the compression masters. They said the just found a really good and solid way of compressing their games and I believe that. I think Bethesda is just a little better at compression than anyone else (at the moment).

They aren't pre-rendered, but they are pre-blocked, and are basically filmed, though in engine. This makes them more complicated to run than telling certain characters to act in a certain way by using a function that doesn't get called ever, except for this one instance. If you pre-block a scene, even if it's in engine, that takes up space. You can tell the scenes are pre-blocked and recorded because they happen exactly the same way every time, no slight ragdoll differences or body positions, unlike in Skyrim. They are not pre-rendered, so they take up less space, but because of their nature, they still take up more space than Skyrim. I do agree though, Bethesda is godly at compression, which helps immensly.

#39
MarchWaltz

MarchWaltz
  • Members
  • 3 233 messages
I want to install the second disk to my drive, then just use the first desk. Not sure if the 360 is capable of doing that.

Actually, I'm pretty sure it is, but it has something to do with piracy I'm sure.

#40
ediskrad327

ediskrad327
  • Members
  • 4 031 messages
i really don't care if i have to change discs every 10 hours

#41
Guest_Mass Effect Player_*

Guest_Mass Effect Player_*
  • Guests
Installing a disk on 360 doesn't install in the traditional sense. You still have to use.

#42
Guest_Catch This Fade_*

Guest_Catch This Fade_*
  • Guests

Luc0s wrote...

jreezy wrote...

Considering the lack of detail Skyrim has minus any pre rendered cutscenes and I'm not suprised how easy it was to compress down to 3.5 gb. The environment looks worse than Oblivion in some cases.


Lack of detail? Are you kidding me?

Sure, the textures in Skyrim are horrible, but you can't possibly say Skyrim lacks detail. The world is full with little props and assets that really makes the world believable and realistic!


If only those textures were not so damn low-res...

Yes the textures is what I was referring to when I said lack of detail.

#43
Guest_The PLC_*

Guest_The PLC_*
  • Guests

MarchWaltz wrote...

I want to install the second disk to my drive, then just use the first desk. Not sure if the 360 is capable of doing that.

Actually, I'm pretty sure it is, but it has something to do with piracy I'm sure.

Yup, not gonna happen.

#44
Guest_Mass Effect Player_*

Guest_Mass Effect Player_*
  • Guests
Just get off the coach!!!:P

#45
camirish1

camirish1
  • Members
  • 139 messages

Rojahar wrote...

I'm pretty sure disc swapping is the closest thing to exercise that some of the people complaining about it get.


I wasn't talking about being lazy, it just seems silly that you need to swap disk 2-3 times (depending if you play after the credits) in a single playthrough for only 2 discs.  I have never seen that happen in a multi-disk game. Recently saw a twitter post saying the Xbox version will most likely have 2 discs again, so I was curious if it was different this time around.

Edit: Want to clarify, I understand the DRM with Xbox doesn't allow for a single disk to play even with the game installed.  And swapping disks is not that big of a problem for me.

Modifié par camirish1, 15 janvier 2012 - 02:41 .


#46
LuluMae

LuluMae
  • Members
  • 268 messages
I do whine every time I have to stop what I'm doing to switch a disc but it doesn't actually bother me to do it. Of course, it would be nice if I could just use one disc after I install them both to my hard drive as MarchWaltz said but even if I can't I'm not going to be honestly annoyed just because I have to swap them.

#47
kregano

kregano
  • Members
  • 794 messages
The way they implemented the disc swapping in ME2 was a bit annoying, because if you skipped over the N7 missions before doing the suicide mission, you'd have to swap Disc 2 for Disc 1 and then swap Disc 1 for Disc 2 again.

It's even worse when your Xbox's tray starts acting up.

#48
Last Vizard

Last Vizard
  • Members
  • 1 187 messages
lol heavy much?

#49
Guest_Mass Effect Player_*

Guest_Mass Effect Player_*
  • Guests

camirish1 wrote...

Rojahar wrote...

I'm pretty sure disc swapping is the closest thing to exercise that some of the people complaining about it get.


I wasn't talking about being lazy, it just seems silly that you need to swap disk 2-3 times (depending if you play after the credits) in a single playthrough.  Recently saw a twitter post saying the Xbox version will most likely have 2 discs again, so I was curious if it was different this time around.

Edit: Want to clarify, I understand the DRM with Xbox doesn't allow for a single disk to play even with the game installed.  And swapping disks is not that big of a problem for me.


And I don't mean to insult you either. If i have. But disk swaping is more than likely going to be on the 360 for technical reason. Yeah it's tedious but I deal with it. So hopefully the successor actually has blu-ray.

#50
Guest_Mass Effect Player_*

Guest_Mass Effect Player_*
  • Guests
Anyway my advice to to the publishers to promote healthy gaming. Just create a really awesome kinect game.