Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 20 janvier 2012 - 06:17 .
Origin and Mass Effect 3
#2451
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:16
#2452
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:16
slimgrin wrote...
Chris Priestly wrote...
Sorry folks, dmex is not an EA employee and what he claims is not valid.
My main concern is the banning bit. If we get banned from the forum will we be locked out of Origin?
BTW, I have a great Japanese porn collection if Origin wants it.
No, it is only mining for unique homemade media....(or so I have heard)
Modifié par Random citizen, 20 janvier 2012 - 06:17 .
#2453
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:17
Chris Priestly wrote...
Sorry folks, dmex is not an EA employee and what he claims is not valid.
If "dmex" isnt a EA developer - how do you explain THAT:
http://forum.ea.com/...00/7488935.page
???
#2454
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:19
#2455
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:20
TheOrigin79 wrote...
Chris Priestly wrote...
Sorry folks, dmex is not an EA employee and what he claims is not valid.
If "dmex" isnt a EA developer - how do you explain THAT:
http://forum.ea.com/...00/7488935.page
???
His "official" avatar is actually just a file hosted on imgur, for one thing.
#2456
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:21
Chris Priestly wrote...
Sorry folks, dmex is not an EA employee and what he claims is not valid.
Clearly, he was answering direct questions and providing clarifications for people who were confused. How could someone with those characteristics work for EA?
So back to the point that was never addressed yesterday by mods. Why do you and Stanley insist sandboxing is circumventing Origin...when it clearly doesn't do that. 3 minutes looking it up will tell anyone that.
#2457
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:22
didymos1120 wrote...
TheOrigin79 wrote...
Chris Priestly wrote...
Sorry folks, dmex is not an EA employee and what he claims is not valid.
If "dmex" isnt a EA developer - how do you explain THAT:
http://forum.ea.com/...00/7488935.page
???
His "official" avatar is actually just a file hosted on imgur, for one thing.
AND? Even developers use imgur - imagine that. And how do you explain his "developer" status?! - oh wait ...
#2458
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:22
Lumikki wrote...
I would say it this way. Your IP and MAC address it self doesn't fully identify person. How ever, they can be used to track person down, what does indentify the person behind of these addresses. It's not fully accurate, but accurate enough. Also because even dynamic IP-addresses doesn't change so often, it can be used to follow persons behavior pattern. Point, what does it matter if person is named or numbered, it's still induvidual person.jamesp81 wrote...
Your IP and MAC address by itself contain no personal information, They
don't contain your name, address, DOB or any other personal data.
I respect that you're here helping us out, but I have to disagree with you here.
IP addresses and MAC addresses are definitely personal information, as both can be easily used to identify an individual, especially a MAC address.
This information really should not be logged at all. I get that it might be needed for part of the DRM authentication, but said information should be purged beyond recovery once authentication is successful.
I'm aware of the specifics. If you wish to link an IP address to a person, it is not difficult to accomplish.
For this reason, Origin should not log such data any longer than necessary to complete it's DRM validation. The address should be purged after that's done.
#2459
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:27
Modifié par Stanley Woo, 20 janvier 2012 - 06:33 .
#2460
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:32
TheOrigin wrote
DMEX how do you explain THAT:
http://social.biowar...6121/98#9027937dmex wrote
Chris Priestly from Bioware did not follow correct procedures.
As you can see below my username, It says Developer, only official staff are allowed these titles.
Modifié par TheOrigin79, 20 janvier 2012 - 06:33 .
#2461
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:35
#2462
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:37
#2463
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:37
#2464
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:44
#2465
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:48
didymos1120 wrote...
I don't know what to think anymore.
I'm confused, too.
#2466
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:54
Chris Priestly wrote...
Sorry folks, dmex is not an EA employee and what he claims is not valid.
Then maybe EA should hire him, because he makes a lot more sense than anything EA could come up with. ;-)
At the very least he made a very good example at what good PR should look like, even if what he claims is untrue his methods would be effective. Instead we are faced with a severe lack of information or maybe even misinformation.
Edit: It also seems dmex challenges Chris' claim on the EA forum. Maybe EA should start getting it's information straight. ;-)
Modifié par Bostur, 20 janvier 2012 - 06:59 .
#2467
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 06:58
#2468
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 07:00
Dovahzaan wrote...
didymos1120 wrote...
I don't know what to think anymore.
I'm confused, too.
Methinks that's the point...
Seriously though, waiting (maybe not so) patiently for more information to be authorized for public release by powers that be... all the while pondering that age old question - to buy or not to buy?
*takes out her pom-poms*
"Go Chris, Go Chris, Goooooooo CHRIS!"
#2469
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 07:01
That's some nice trolling he did here and there then.Chris Priestly wrote...
Sorry folks, dmex is not an EA employee and what he claims is not valid.
Nevertheless, my position on the matter never changed to begin with.
Modifié par Mister Mida, 20 janvier 2012 - 07:02 .
#2470
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 07:02
didymos1120 wrote...
TheOrigin79 wrote...
Chris Priestly wrote...
Sorry folks, dmex is not an EA employee and what he claims is not valid.
If "dmex" isnt a EA developer - how do you explain THAT:
http://forum.ea.com/...00/7488935.page
???
His "official" avatar is actually just a file hosted on imgur, for one thing.
I just checked and the offical forum admin avatar is just on imageshack. http://forum.ea.com/...43.page#5339859
Okay I'm really baffled right now.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 20 janvier 2012 - 07:02 .
#2471
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 07:05
#2472
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 07:05
Looks like a hacker for me.
http://www.google.de...-8&q=0x0D06F00D
Modifié par Johnsen1972, 20 janvier 2012 - 07:05 .
#2473
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 07:05
Furtled wrote...
Annnnd to repeat since there's still no answer and EA's customer service sent me right back here...Would it be possible to get some official clarity on this one please?Chris Priestly wrote...
5) Is there an opt in or opt out clause for data collection?
Users will be allowed to opt-out of Mass Effect 3 data collection from inside the game.
Right now that reads like you can opt-out of ME game data collection as you could with previous games, but that there is no option to opt out of Origin data collection - which is another kettle of fish entirely, and a pretty smelly one at that.
Moar Questions! (sorry Chris)
Will future DLC and patches be available through the BSN site like the ones for ME2 or will they only be available via Origin?
Thank you & have a good weekend
(p.s. if you've already responded to either of these and I've missed it - sorry!)
Be aware, the data collection of ME3 should be the same as ME2, used later for statistic, this is not the contreversial collected data from the Origin client.
#2474
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 07:06
I'm really interested now who's right or wrong here... *grabs popcorn*
Modifié par casadechrisso, 20 janvier 2012 - 07:07 .
#2475
Posté 20 janvier 2012 - 07:07




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





