184 réponses à ce sujet

[AlexXIV]

LPPrince wrote...

*snip*
the act of something becoming itself or involving itself with itself in a pattern.
*snip*

So like if I become myself or involve myself with myself in a pattern. Sounds like fun.

[LPPrince]

AlexXIV wrote...

LPPrince wrote...

*snip*
the act of something becoming itself or involving itself with itself in a pattern.
*snip*

So like if I become myself or involve myself with myself in a pattern. Sounds like fun.

It would be deemed Alexception.

[AlexXIV]

LPPrince wrote...

AlexXIV wrote...

LPPrince wrote...

*snip*
the act of something becoming itself or involving itself with itself in a pattern.
*snip*

So like if I become myself or involve myself with myself in a pattern. Sounds like fun.

It would be deemed Alexception.

Why didn't I pick this for forum nick ... too late I guess ...

[I-am-Biwinning]

Hmm, does anyone know how to convert valve time to bioware time? I know soon=two months in valve time.

[AlexXIV]

I-am-Biwinning wrote...

Hmm, does anyone know how to convert valve time to bioware time? I know soon=two months in valve time.

In that case Bioware time is valve time minus two months plus x. In which x can be anything from one second to eternity (or never).

[Mike Shepard]

I-am-Biwinning wrote...

Hmm, does anyone know how to convert valve time to bioware time? I know soon=two months in valve time.

I do:

1 Month "Valve Time" = .25 Months "BioWare Time"; that means:


2 * .25 = .5

2 weeks


*Note: the preceeding forumla is meant to be a joke and is in no way meant to reflect factual conversions. Copyright 2012 All Rights Reserved Mike Shepard, Inc.™

EDIT: Ninja'd by above

Modifié par Mike Shepard, 17 janvier 2012 - 12:26 .

[Kaiser Shepard]

It unlocks stuff in Amalur, so I'll go on a limb here and say it gets released - shock of shocks - before Amalur proper.

Which leaves us two more tuesdays in January, and one in February.

Chris Priestly wrote...

YOu only love Jessica cuz she's smart and cute and awesome. I've been saying "soon" for month. 

Awww, c'mere, big guy.

*evilhug*

Modifié par Kaiser Shepard, 17 janvier 2012 - 12:28 .

[I-am-Biwinning]

AlexXIV wrote...

I-am-Biwinning wrote...

Hmm, does anyone know how to convert valve time to bioware time? I know soon=two months in valve time.

In that case Bioware time is valve time minus two months plus x. In which x can be anything from one second to eternity (or never).

Oh, wow. I thought valve time was quirky and unpredictable without the proper equations. In bioware time, the equations don't help very much. If I remember correctly, isn't the equation for every release and update with no specified date equal to something like: release date = when it comes out

[Adragalus]

Adugan wrote...

LPPrince wrote...

Actually guys, soon is being misinterpreted as S.O.O.N.

Soon
Or
Otherwise
Never

You cant use the word itself in an acronym of itself. That is like using a word to define itself.

I'm So Meta, Even This Acronym.

[I-am-Biwinning]

Adragalus wrote...

Adugan wrote...

LPPrince wrote...

Actually guys, soon is being misinterpreted as S.O.O.N.

Soon
Or
Otherwise
Never

You cant use the word itself in an acronym of itself. That is like using a word to define itself.

I'm So Meta, Even This Acronym.

Actually you can do that,  It's called a recursive acronym. For example, GNU stands for GNU's not Unix.

[AlexXIV]

I-am-Biwinning wrote...

AlexXIV wrote...

I-am-Biwinning wrote...

Hmm, does anyone know how to convert valve time to bioware time? I know soon=two months in valve time.

In that case Bioware time is valve time minus two months plus x. In which x can be anything from one second to eternity (or never).

Oh, wow. I thought valve time was quirky and unpredictable without the proper equations. In bioware time, the equations don't help very much. If I remember correctly, isn't the equation for every release and update with no specified date equal to something like: release date = when it comes out

Interestingly Bioware release date are rather accurate. So you can bet money on March 6th. Though info on trailers is ... vague at best.

Modifié par AlexXIV, 17 janvier 2012 - 12:35 .

[Customz]

Merchant2006 wrote...

What is love? Baby don't hurt me...

I'm no longer capable of hearin' this without thinking of turians... one techno turian in particular.

I'm quite conflicted about the demo though. I wan't to play it but spoilers, spoilers... Not even the multiplayer demo will be safe from them.

Modifié par Customz, 17 janvier 2012 - 12:37 .

[FERMi27]

Jessica's hawt btw(on the right)

I'd even... nah, I'll be banned forever if I say that.

Modifié par FERMi27, 17 janvier 2012 - 12:54 .

[Apocsapel91]

Soon? That's awfully ambiguous.

Modifié par Apocsapel91, 17 janvier 2012 - 12:55 .

[OdanUrr]

FERMi27 wrote...


Jessica's hawt btw(on the right)

I'd even... nah, I'll be banned forever if I say that.

:innocent:

[LPPrince]

Oh God, is this gonna turn into a "Jessica's appearance is aesthetically pleasing" thread?

loool

[OdanUrr]

LPPrince wrote...

Oh God, is this gonna turn into a "Jessica's appearance is aesthetically pleasing" thread?

loool

"Forgive them, for they are so shallow.":D

[FERMi27]

LPPrince wrote...

Oh God, is this gonna turn into a "Jessica's appearance is aesthetically pleasing" thread?

loool

Why not? That's true, why not let her know about it.

[LPPrince]

Why not? Because it'd be off topic and not ME3 related.

You don't want to simultaneously flatter her and make her sad, do you?

[Taz_]

Honestly, I can this beta/demo being released next week. GT TV will have new footage in their new episode, and I can see them coinciding the early release with it.

[Mass_Effect1-3_4_LIFE]

LPPrince wrote...

Why not? Because it'd be off topic and not ME3 related.

You don't want to simultaneously flatter her and make her sad, do you?

lol^

[FERMi27]

LPPrince wrote...

Why not? Because it'd be off topic and not ME3 related.

You don't want to simultaneously flatter her and make her sad, do you?

I guess you're right. *sigh*

[Yuoaman]

LPPrince wrote...

Oh God, is this gonna turn into a "Jessica's appearance is aesthetically pleasing" thread?

loool

I doubt they'd say it in those exact words. Though if they did we'd have to determine some sort of baseline to evaluate this scientifically.

Because we're scientists now.

Science.