Aucune réponse à ce sujet

[craigdolphin]

 Dear moderators,
Several posts have been removed today without explanation. It appears to be a response to people mentioning installing the origins client is a virtual machine environment (also known as sand boxing) so as to ensure that no private data can be exposed to the client software.

I'm trying to figure out what forum rule this is supposed to break.

This approach does not circumvent any technical protection measure and is not against the Eula/TOS.to my knowledge, it doesn't break any law, nor is it illicit.

The only reason to disallow such discussion is to prevent people from understanding how to ensure that their private information stays private in the absence of ea providing an explicit opt-out option for paying customers. If this is the case, then it rather undermines the argument that origins previous scanning behavior was an aberration and it reinforces customer suspicions that the Eula terms are intentionally being left overly permissive so that spyware-like behavior could resume in the future.

In short, preventing discussion of legal measures to ensure data privacy appears...contradictory tothe assurances made regarding the nature and intent of the origins client.


I understand that these forums are your property, and there is no right to free speech on them, but clarification of the road rules would be appreciated.
Respectful
Y, 
Me.