@Chris
No need to educate me on that regard, since I am am fully aware of such. It is critical to remain objective when it coms to history, and always have an open mind, especially regarding stuff that lack authentic sources. I've already stumbled upon quoted facts which have been proven invalid, and I rarely use internet as a source for anything more than superficial information.
Alexander is certainly a prominent figure, but from my extended studies on him I see him as widely overplayed (truly, if anyone deserves the title "The Great" it is his father, since Alexander's basis is on Philip's merits).
I know my history, so appreciate the accurate statement, but it is wasted on me.
I have no doubts that you most certainly do -- It was mostly in regards to the anime statement, given that anime tend to be as loose as all possible in regards to historical context matters, examples like Le Chevalier D'Eon, but as in all adaptations, that's to create a dramatic story that can appeal to a modern audience. Recent examples, like say Band of Brothers or locally to me, a show called 1864 (centering around Denmark's losing hold on Sleswig-Holstein against Prussia). Making the war against Prussia in 1864 feel somewhat related to the war in Afghanistan works on a modern audience, that's what contributes to the success of these shows. Making cathartic drama is key, whereas historical accuracy always come in as, at best, second priority. It's how it works in all mediums of course -- Largely a tv-audience does not care for historical accuracy but rather entertainment and if it's entertaining, if it can relay a message, draw perspectives on how we see the world, that they can take with them into their own lives. Then it's a success.
Consider my posts merely to wanting to have a conversation. Nothing more 