Not by today standards...darthgamer6621 wrote...
Yeah, becuase anything less than 9 means the game is rubbish, can't be the only one who thinks 7/10 is a good score.
Guess the Metacritic score.
Débuté par
Archangel470
, janv. 22 2012 09:56
#51
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 02:05
Remus Artega
-
- Members
- 605 messages
Retour en haut
#52
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 02:30
Dreadwing 67
-
- Members
- 414 messages
Ghost Warrior wrote...
100
Everything else is unacceptable.
#54
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 02:39
Gabriel S.
-
- Members
- 982 messages
Remus Artega wrote...
Not by today standards...darthgamer6621 wrote...
Yeah, becuase anything less than 9 means the game is rubbish, can't be the only one who thinks 7/10 is a good score.
I'd say it depends more on how full your wallet is.
#55
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 02:41
Stalker
-
- Members
- 2 784 messages
Critics: 98
User: 7 (from people still whining after boring mako-missions and useless inventory)
User: 7 (from people still whining after boring mako-missions and useless inventory)
Modifié par Mr Massakka, 22 janvier 2012 - 02:50 .
#57
Guest_PDesign_*
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 02:42
Guest_PDesign_*
Guest_PDesign_*
-
- Guests
97-99
Modifié par PDesign, 22 janvier 2012 - 03:25 .
#58
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 02:47
sackyhack
-
- Members
- 623 messages
Critic: 92
User: 3.5 from people review bombing it
User: 3.5 from people review bombing it
#59
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 03:10
AlexXIV
-
- Members
- 10 670 messages
I don't see why it would be worse than ME2's. ME2 didn't do much more than deliver a polished game of expected Bioware quality. Alone the fact that is the 'endgame' of the trilogy should boost the scores. As it does for the anticipation.
So I am going with 95.
So I am going with 95.
Modifié par AlexXIV, 22 janvier 2012 - 03:12 .
#61
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 03:22
N7Infernox
-
- Members
- 1 450 messages
98. You heard it here first, folks
#63
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 05:13
AlanC9
-
- Members
- 35 825 messages
If we're going to have a thread like this, we really need to pick specific numbers rather than ranges. Five points is a huge spread.
I'm going with 95. Critic rating -- Metacritic user ratings are worthless.
I'm going with 95. Critic rating -- Metacritic user ratings are worthless.
#64
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 05:23
VinWizzy
-
- Members
- 359 messages
From the critics, it would have to be eve higher or lower than ME2 so +90. For the users IDGAF because they are the most bias, ignorant trolls I ever seen on the internet. I mean you know someone is trolling when they give it a 1. Seriously...
#65
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 05:26
sackyhack
-
- Members
- 623 messages
VinWizzy wrote...
From the critics, it would have to be eve higher or lower than ME2 so +90. For the users IDGAF because they are the most bias, ignorant trolls I ever seen on the internet. I mean you know someone is trolling when they give it a 1. Seriously...
Yeah. People basically rate something a 10 if they liked it, or a 0 if they have anything to complain about. Not much inbetween. Some reviews even say things like "I really like this but I think it's overrated so I gave it a zero". With the PC version I'm willing to bet no matter how good the game is, it's going to get lots of 0s because of Origin.
Modifié par sackyhack, 22 janvier 2012 - 05:27 .
#67
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 06:01
Dominus
-
- Members
- 15 426 messages
Critical: Approximately between 91-94, varying between console and PC ports.
User: Laughably lower than that.
User: Laughably lower than that.
#68
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 06:12
TheJiveDJ
-
- Members
- 956 messages
Okay guys, we all know it's gonna be somewhere between 0 and 100. So let`s just get this over with and start counting. I`ll go first. ONE.
#69
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 06:44
someguy1231
-
- Members
- 1 120 messages
If the score is too high, the game's detractors will claim that reviewers were bribed.
If the score is too low, the game's supporters will claim reviewers "just don't get it".
Wait, the same could be said about pretty much any game, really.
If the score is too low, the game's supporters will claim reviewers "just don't get it".
Wait, the same could be said about pretty much any game, really.
Modifié par someguy1231, 22 janvier 2012 - 06:45 .
#70
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 06:48
IllusiveMike
-
- Members
- 236 messages
Who's going to buy ME3 based on the aggregate review score? NO ONE on the BSN.
By the way, it will undoubtedly be in 9.5+ range.
By the way, it will undoubtedly be in 9.5+ range.
#71
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 06:51
Anthropophobic
-
- Members
- 585 messages
70% is just barely a C. It's 6 points from failing utterly. 7/10 is horrible.darthgamer6621 wrote...
Yeah, becuase anything less than 9 means the game is rubbish, can't be the only one who thinks 7/10 is a good score.
Most critics have such low standards these days, a game has to be at least a B+ to be worth playing, in most cases.
#72
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 06:53
someguy1231
-
- Members
- 1 120 messages
IllusiveMike wrote...
Who's going to buy ME3 based on the aggregate review score? NO ONE on the BSN.
By the way, it will undoubtedly be in 9.5+ range.
Agreed. ME2 got a 96 and a surprisingly high user review (by Metacritic standards), and yet reading BSN sometimes you might think its reception was as bad as DA2's. Sometimes it seems BSN is living its own little world cut off from the rest of the gaming world. We'd do well to remember that, and that we represent a miniscule proportion of the fanbase.
I don't agree on your second point though. Most trilogies tend to get slightly lower scores on their third entry, even if its of highest quality, simply because much of the "wow factor" may have worn off from reviewers. Gears of War 3, for example, got a 91 whereas the previous two games got a 94 and 95, and yet many GoW fans think its the best yet, and many reviewers agreed.
#73
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 06:55
BatmanPWNS
-
- Members
- 6 392 messages
Probably between 92-96. Can't imagine it beating ME2 and it's high 96%.
Also, I agree with someguy and even UC3 got less than UC2, which got higher than UC1.
Also, I agree with someguy and even UC3 got less than UC2, which got higher than UC1.
Modifié par BatmanPWNS, 22 janvier 2012 - 06:56 .
#75
Posté 22 janvier 2012 - 07:03
IllusiveMike
-
- Members
- 236 messages
someguy1231 wrote...
Agreed. ME2 got a 96 and a surprisingly high user review (by Metacritic standards), and yet reading BSN sometimes you might think its reception was as bad as DA2's. Sometimes it seems BSN is living its own little world cut off from the rest of the gaming world. We'd do well to remember that, and that we represent a miniscule proportion of the fanbase.
I don't agree on your second point though. Most trilogies tend to get slightly lower scores on their third entry, even if its of highest quality, simply because much of the "wow factor" may have worn off from reviewers. Gears of War 3, for example, got a 91 whereas the previous two games got a 94 and 95, and yet many GoW fans think its the best yet, and many reviewers agreed.
Quite possibly so. Though, it will depend on when you look at the metacritic score, it will be artifically high with the early reviews and then maybe peter down to something more realistic as the "wowzers" wears off. But, I would argue that AC and ME franchises are very different beasts (for example, one recycles game mechanics a good bit more than the other.)
