daqs wrote...
Pot, meet kettle.Lotion Soronnar wrote...
Dear lord, the horrible formating..
And a looong post.
this
daqs wrote...
Pot, meet kettle.Lotion Soronnar wrote...
Dear lord, the horrible formating..
And a looong post.
Since they lured them to that colony...? That's the point isn't through Cerberus' manipulations they lure the Collectors that way. Though there was indeed some delay with the turrets, so I guess that mostly nulifies my original pointLotion Soronnar wrote...
Since when does Cerberus control the collectors? They strike when they want.
And the turrets were suppsoed to be on-line... But for some reason aren't.
I never said it was worthless.Advantages of advanced tech are shown in game. They are mentioned by other characters. Like hte prothean chance on mars.
More logical characters (like Morodin and Legion) advocate keeping it.
(Yet because of writer stupidity they change their tune later.)
There is NOTHING in the game to indicate the base is worthless.
General User wrote...
What do you mean by "we"?
Ah! I thought so!Varhjhin wrote...
General User wrote...
What do you mean by "we"?
Us... You know, the humans.
General User wrote...
Ah! I thought so!
Just musin' but the thing about there being a "we" or an "us" mean there is always going to be a "them." Thus illustrating at least the beginnings of a good bit of the Cerberus mindset.
Lotion Soronnar wrote...
And what good did his "ehtics" do to the dead krogan?
A ticking clock...till the reapers arive.
Guest_Luc0s_*
General User wrote...
Ah! I thought so!Varhjhin wrote...
General User wrote...
What do you mean by "we"?
Us... You know, the humans.
Just musin' but the thing about there being a "we" or an "us" mean there is always going to be a "them." Thus illustrating at least the beginnings of a good bit of the Cerberus mindset.
Modifié par Luc0s, 30 janvier 2012 - 10:23 .
Exactly Cerberus will do anything to achive there goal if the Illusive man was given the choice of killing 1 billion humans for Cerberus to have control over the galaxy he whould do it cause he doesnt care about sacrifices as long as hes not the one that has to make them hes fine with letting others die for his ideals but he wont defend them himselfiakus wrote...
Lotion Soronnar wrote...
And what good did his "ehtics" do to the dead krogan?
Nothing. Mordin still has much to answer for. And he knows it.
But even Mordin has lines he will not cross. Lines we know TIM won't think twice to cross.A ticking clock...till the reapers arive.
What do the Reapers have to do with thresher maws, biotic death camps for children, feeding dead admirals to thorian creepers, etc?
Modifié par Varhjhin, 30 janvier 2012 - 10:28 .
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Phaedon wrote...
You clearly did not follow the same Internet and discuss with the same people off and online as I did when situations such as the shooting on Norway, or the...
Phaedon wrote...
It matters not what you think. Ethnogenesis and tribalism are well documented, with collective empathy being noted, in the creation of "tribes" not only with humans, but dogs and elephants also.
Phaedon wrote...
At the times when human population was at its lowest, we were divided,
Phaedon wrote...
I'll gladly return tomorrow to note your amusing attempts at proving that humans are not social animals, or that "we were better off as tribes".
Oh but you're wrong!Luc0s wrote...
General User wrote...
Ah! I thought so!Varhjhin wrote...
General User wrote...
What do you mean by "we"?
Us... You know, the humans.
Just musin' but the thing about there being a "we" or an "us" mean there is always going to be a "them." Thus illustrating at least the beginnings of a good bit of the Cerberus mindset.
It's only natural for humans to think in groups. It's perfectly normal to think in terms of "we" and "us" versus "they" and "them". It has nothing to do with Cerberus.
When you watch soccer, it's "us" (your country's football team) versus "them" (the teams from the other countries).
When you're on vacation with your friends, it's "us" (you and your friends) and "them" (the foreign boys).
When you're part of a political party, it's "us" (your political party) versus "them" (any other political party).
When you follow a religion, it's "us" (your religion) versus "them" (any other religion).
When you're part of a galactic community, it's "us" (your species) versus "them" (any other species).
You get the point.
Modifié par A Golden Dragon, 30 janvier 2012 - 10:56 .
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
A Golden Dragon wrote...
When you're part of a galactic community, it's "us" (your species) versus "them" (any other species).
being human doesnt make you better we all make mistakesGeneral User wrote...
"That's the way things are but not the way things have to be." (I'm not sure the source on that quote, but that's how I'd put it)
And therein lies my fundamental disagreement with Cerberus. They don't think we're ultimately any better than the aliens, I do.
AlexXIV wrote...
Us and them basically boils down to known and unknown. Strangers are them and family is us. It's a mere question of learning to know 'them' so they can be part of the 'us'. As some people already stated several times in discussions like this, the danger of aliens is not that they are so different from us. It's that 'we' are so much alike. However I think the proper course of action in the long run is to understand each other. I mean we all know how things work. You meet someone, never knew the person before. You talk, start to like each other, become friends, family, whatever. I think most conflicts that exist in our world origin from fear of the unknown. Be it religion, culture, language ... whatever 'they' do different than 'us'.
You can't have one billion friends anyway.Peer of the Empire wrote...
AlexXIV wrote...
Us and them basically boils down to known and unknown. Strangers are them and family is us. It's a mere question of learning to know 'them' so they can be part of the 'us'. As some people already stated several times in discussions like this, the danger of aliens is not that they are so different from us. It's that 'we' are so much alike. However I think the proper course of action in the long run is to understand each other. I mean we all know how things work. You meet someone, never knew the person before. You talk, start to like each other, become friends, family, whatever. I think most conflicts that exist in our world origin from fear of the unknown. Be it religion, culture, language ... whatever 'they' do different than 'us'.
Or, people get to know you and realize they just don't like you or want to be like you.
Guest_Luc0s_*
General User wrote...
Oh but you're wrong!Luc0s wrote...
General User wrote...
Ah! I thought so!Varhjhin wrote...
General User wrote...
What do you mean by "we"?
Us... You know, the humans.
Just musin' but the thing about there being a "we" or an "us" mean there is always going to be a "them." Thus illustrating at least the beginnings of a good bit of the Cerberus mindset.
It's only natural for humans to think in groups. It's perfectly normal to think in terms of "we" and "us" versus "they" and "them". It has nothing to do with Cerberus.
When you watch soccer, it's "us" (your country's football team) versus "them" (the teams from the other countries).
When you're on vacation with your friends, it's "us" (you and your friends) and "them" (the foreign boys).
When you're part of a political party, it's "us" (your political party) versus "them" (any other political party).
When you follow a religion, it's "us" (your religion) versus "them" (any other religion).
When you're part of a galactic community, it's "us" (your species) versus "them" (any other species).
You get the point.
Take all the scenarios you cite, especially the last one as it comes nearest to Cerberus' situation, as long as the "them"'s are honorable, peaceful, and interested in things like "peaceful commerce" and "scientific cooperation" then peaceful coexistence with "them"'s is not only possible, but highly preferable.
But if, however, the "them"'s are greedy, cruel, jealous, murderous, etc., etc., then responding in kind is, though not really an admirable response, at least a completely natural one. Thus you get an organization like Cerberus.
Guest_Luc0s_*
AlexXIV wrote...
Us and them basically boils down to known and unknown. Strangers are them and family is us. It's a mere question of learning to know 'them' so they can be part of the 'us'. As some people already stated several times in discussions like this, the danger of aliens is not that they are so different from us. It's that 'we' are so much alike. However I think the proper course of action in the long run is to understand each other. I mean we all know how things work. You meet someone, never knew the person before. You talk, start to like each other, become friends, family, whatever. I think most conflicts that exist in our world origin from fear of the unknown. Be it religion, culture, language ... whatever 'they' do different than 'us'.
Modifié par Luc0s, 31 janvier 2012 - 02:09 .
Poison_Berrie wrote...
I just said the point is that some people consider the risk of the base either being in the sole hands of Cerberus or the risk of the Reapers using it's continued existence to their own advantage (spying and indoctrinating) or both to not weigh up to the base's worth.
Not to mention that it is just as much bollocks to think the Reapers would be okay with us getting all that technology if it really was as useful against them as people keep suggesting or if they didn't have some things in place to turn it to their advantage.
KotorEffect3 wrote...
daqs wrote...
Pot, meet kettle.Lotion Soronnar wrote...
Dear lord, the horrible formating..
And a looong post.
this