terdferguson123 wrote...
While I understand what your saying, I have to disagree pragmatism and religion are directly opposite of each other. Pragmatism is thought based on facts, Religion is thought based on faith, the two have no connection whatsoever.
I also did not say she was the opposite of Pragmatic, I said she was the least pragmatic of your companions. She is not cautious at all, she spends a great deal of time comparing aliens to animals, insulting them for being different than herself, and generally mistrusting them even after they have proven themselves. Ashley is just as new to the ship as Garrus or Wrex, just because she is human, does not give her the right to think Shepard should trust her more than them.
You talk about pragmatism as if it's a belief system. It's not. It's a way of thinking, of approaching life. Likewise, facts are not 'things' that exist. Facts are proven statements about certain things. There are facts about building, facts about religion, facts about politics, facts about science, facts about the Earth, facts about the sun, etc.
You could be as pragmatic about religion as you could about anything else in your life. Again, being pragmatic is not a belief system, therefore it cannot be measured against religion.
When she makes that statement, none of them have so far proven themselves. Tali, in a way, has (which could be why she doesn't put Tali on the list of people that shouldn't be allowed access). She never insults anyone for being different from her, nor does she compare aliens to animals at all. In the dog/bear analogy, she's saying that humanity is the dog and the Council is the human.
She's a SYSTEMS ALLIANCE MARINE?! REMEMBER? The same service as Shepard? She has every right to think that she'd be a little more trusted than a mercenary that just got picked up a few minutes earlier. Your statement is ludicrously off the mark.