Ottemis wrote...
Hmm synthesis is the way to go for me.
I've considered the following, control being a status quo, you only take the reapers out of the equation, plus Shepard. Risk of the impending war/organic annihilation still existing, but you give it a chance to prove the opposite.
Then there's destroy, where you take the reapers out, but also the Geth and EDI, which for all my Sheps is just not an option, however much I want to see them (my sheps) live, that would be going against what they stoold for since the beginning and the choices they made in regards to synthetic life throughout the game. Risk of the impending war/organic annihilation still existing, but you give it a chance to prove the opposite.
Then there's synthesis, believing the impending war threat exists assuming StarChild is what he claims to be, it's the only one that suggestedly assures to break the cycle in therms of war.
To me the main questions were simple, I asked myself:
1. Do I believe StarChild? Yes.
2. Do I believe war is inevitable, do I believe our annihilation in extension is inevitable? Yes.
3. Do I recognise the Geth and EDI as fullfletched "life"forms? Yes.
4. If not synthetic life, but say Turian life, would I merge to save them (and everyone in effect)? Yes.
Outcome Synthesis every time, I can't get around it.
I have a couple of problems with your logic.
1) Destroy doesn't, actually, destroy all synthetics. How do I know this? If you play it just right, Shepard lives at the end. If synthetics were all killed, Shep would most likely have died right along with them given she's part synthetic herself and probably can't exist without her synthetic parts.
The other thing... Geth are not their platforms, but the programs that run on them - AIs, just like EDI. I suppose the Reapers are too. AIs are just very elaborate programs. VIs are elaborate programs that have the potential to become AIs under the right circumstances (EDI used to be a VI, for example). Does the destroy option distinguish between the sorts of programs it destroys? If not, then wave good bye to computing all together. And while you're waving good bye to computing, you might as well wave good bye to space flight too.
So no, the Destroy ending logically doesn't destroy all synthetics... not even just all reaper based synthetics.
(This does come back to why the ME3 endings suck, because they just don't make any sense.)
2) Synthesis is the "I agree with the StarChild" ending (which you clearly do). The main problem with this ending is - how long does it last for? There are species out there that are slowly climbing out of the mud and evolving. Synthesis would NOT stop evolution, would NOT stop Chaos in the long term. It's a futile act. War would be inevitable between the non-synthesized and the completely organic, for exactly the same reasons the StarChild gave for the inevitable war between synthetic and organic (to stop the inevitable war...
By the way, war is NOT inevitable between organic and synthetic. Shepard can prove that by working out peace between the Quarians and the Geth. They CAN exist in harmony. If you want inevitable war - take a look at the Salarians and the Krogan, whom you CANNOT work out a peace between (at least, not that I could work out in the game, otherwise I would have done it).





Retour en haut











