It works like a double edged sword: humans are a good example of how social competition can benefit civilizations; relatively speaking they did develop faster than Turians or Asaris. Although their systematic refusal to conform to the status quo did create that fear of humans among other species. Krogans history in the other hand show how reverse and extreme that same process can be.xbb1024 wrote...
I actually think that social evolution happens the fastest where there is competition, and thus the need for continueous change. Under a single stable state, there would not be the same drive for advancement because the state would not have a desire to change the status quo.
i wonder how much of social stability is a product of wisdom born from experience(which Krogans failed to accquire - but Turians did). Or is it inherent to Asari nature. Does living a long life translate into (more to loose) a conciliatory attitude when facing problems? Just thinking out loud.The same would go with life expectancy. If the Asari did have such long lives, then the same political elite would be in power for a longer time and advancement within the social hierarchy would be slower. This would make thier society more stable, but also not as dynamic as the Salarians. Of corse, I'm making a comment about an alian race so my observations may not be valid.
Modifié par SaturnRing, 28 juillet 2012 - 06:00 .





Retour en haut







































