Saphra Deden wrote...
Fine, please point out to me where the fascinating and deep quarian/geth debate is to be found in ME2?
For starters, you have the Tali-Brand Infodump in ME1. And then the plight of the quarians, which you personally witness, in ME2. You see the slaughter the geth inflict personally--you spend half of ME1 and a good chunk of ME2 fighting through it. Tali nearly comes to tears in her loyalty mission when she tries to explain what it's like to be in her shoes.
I never saw one. Not in ME2, not in ME1. It won't be there in ME3. The interesting debate only happens on the forums. In-game the debate was decided long ago and it goes like this:
The geth are good guys, the geth are victims.
Beg to differ after how many I've used for target practice at this point.
The quarians are stubborn and hateful, they are obsessed, they are flawed.
Han'Gerrel, Shala'Raan, Tali'Zora, Veetor'Nara, Kal'Reegar, Lia'Vrel, and that poor kid, Kenn, were obviously all hateful, obsessed people. Totally bad guys. Don't like 'em at all, nope. What jerks.
Jona, your mother obviously lied about loving you very much. Because, see, the quarians are just a hateful bunch.
The massive quarian genocide? That's never talked about. Never. The games never bring up just how many quarians must have died or ever address the geth's role in that slaughter.
So, uh... the quarians just magically got into that flotilla by themselves. Thriving civilization reduced to a mere 17 million, which is less than the New York City metropolitan area? Mass effect fields did it. Abandon colonies? Oh, they just got bored and went home.
So yeah, the debate is interesting, one of my favorites, but it's not in ME2.
The devil's in the details, my friend. Much of Mass Effect's depth comes not from what it tells you, but from what it shows you.