Mass Effect: Deception Discussion Thread (Updated 2/2/2012) *Now with 30% more links!*
#9876
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:14
#9877
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:15
All of which was not important.Yuoaman wrote...
Luigitornado wrote...
To be fair, all of the books, with exception of the first one. Have had minimal effects on the main story.jasonsantanna wrote...
**SPOILERS!**
How completely worthless is this novel when the entire plot contained within is MEANINGLESS? The only major outcome that occurs in Deception is that the three characters previously created in the novel Ascension - Gillian, Hendel, and Nick - are all randomly killed off at the very end for no other purpose other than to erase their existence from the Mass Effect universe. Other than that, nothing matters in this novel to the plot of the Mass Effect series, NOTHING - Anderson and Kahlee make no progress into investigating either Cerberus or the Reapers, the Council still actively dismisses the existence of the Reapers, there is no mention of the events of Arrival or the escalating tensions between the Alliance and the batarians over it, there is no active effort by Cerberus into any of their secret projects... none of the characters grow or evolve, none of the conflicts previously established in other Mass Effect media are resolved, nothing is any different for the Mass Effect universe or its characters from the beginning of this novel to its end, not a single darn thing..
Well the first one set up the Anderson/Saren thing and set up the discovery of Sovereign, the second one set up the quarians' problems with Cerberus, and the third book revealed more about Cerberus and started to set up for ME3.
And since ME3 isn't out yet, you can't really make any connections to the book yet. So again. Drama queens.
#9878
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:18
Ive been pretty invested in the ME universe since it started, games,dlc,comics and novels. Ive always had high expectations from the Mass Effect team and have been able to live with any of the continuity errors that have shown up until now. But this novel takes the cake.
If Deception isn't removed or partially removed from canon, my faith in any future Mass Effect product will be seriously tarnished, which is very disappointing as I have thoroughly enjoyed the ME universe up till now.
#9879
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:18
Luigitornado wrote...
To be fair, all of the books, with exception of the first one. Have had minimal effects on the main story.jasonsantanna wrote...
**SPOILERS!**
How completely worthless is this novel when the entire plot contained within is MEANINGLESS? The only major outcome that occurs in Deception is that the three characters previously created in the novel Ascension - Gillian, Hendel, and Nick - are all randomly killed off at the very end for no other purpose other than to erase their existence from the Mass Effect universe. Other than that, nothing matters in this novel to the plot of the Mass Effect series, NOTHING - Anderson and Kahlee make no progress into investigating either Cerberus or the Reapers, the Council still actively dismisses the existence of the Reapers, there is no mention of the events of Arrival or the escalating tensions between the Alliance and the batarians over it, there is no active effort by Cerberus into any of their secret projects... none of the characters grow or evolve, none of the conflicts previously established in other Mass Effect media are resolved, nothing is any different for the Mass Effect universe or its characters from the beginning of this novel to its end, not a single darn thing..
Actually, the second book explained why the Quarians hated Cerberus so much, which was intergral to the first mission and Tali's story elements in ME2.
#9880
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:18
Luigitornado wrote...
All of which was not important.
I wouldn't say that Revelation was not important to the main story. It serves are the prologue, setting events in motion that are concluded in ME1.
#9881
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:19
#9882
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:19
nitefyre410 wrote...
ZLurps wrote...
NYG1991 wrote...
ZLurps wrote...
NYG1991 wrote...
ZLurps wrote...
There has been some discussion about Dietz other works but I liked to ask something specific.
How good he is with characters. Do his characters have depth and can he write convincing emotional scene?
He wrote one of the HALO novels. It basically enacted the events of the first game so it didn't really have much depth or emotion. It was the worst one of the 3 novels prior to HALO 2 IMO
Thanks. Setting doesn't really give much room for things like character depth, was that written from Master Chief's point of view? I need a bit more than that but for some reason I'm not really all that excited to go buy his other novels.
It was multiple POV. Chief, covenant elite, and a grunt. I was able to grit my way through it cause i was so excited for the upcoming game. IIRC there was like 5 different POV characters. If you're big time HALO fan you might get some enjoyment out of it as he doesn't trash the lore in that like he does here.
Okay thanks. Maybe I can get it used for some ridiculously low price. Then I don't know if I want to read it. I may check it just for the things James Faith referred, if I have enough motivation and time.
if Deception is any indicator of they type of books Mr. Deitz writes I will be avoiding them like the plague. Though if you are interested in Halo Lore I would recommend reading Dr.Hasley journal that came with Collectors editon of Halo:Reach... you should be able to find a PDF out there somewhere.
Actually Mass Effect Novels are only game tie-in material I have ever read. I used to read a let when I was younger but at some point novels changed to manuals and that sort of things. Thanks for the tip though.
#9883
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:19
ZLurps wrote...
How did he delivered what character was feeling to readers. Was it like describing physical things, feeling nauseous after seeing something bad, or "Oh, that was bad" Master Chief thought grievengly? or something else?
Sorry, havenť this book in English, so I canť post it, because even translator had eliminated big part of Dietz specific
#9884
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:20
What is it that bothers you so much? Grow up.XXIceColdXX wrote...
Bioware please repond us! End this, and remove deception from canon.
Ive been pretty invested in the ME universe since it started, games,dlc,comics and novels. Ive always had high expectations from the Mass Effect team and have been able to live with any of the continuity errors that have shown up until now. But this novel takes the cake.
If Deception isn't removed or partially removed from canon, my faith in any future Mass Effect product will be seriously tarnished, which is very disappointing as I have thoroughly enjoyed the ME universe up till now.
Take the mistakes as mistakes in canon and be done with it. Does it really decrease the value of the Mass Effect universe?
#9885
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:21
Because it IS NOT a BIG deal. And if people want to complain about the book, then I have a right to complain about the complainers.didymos1120 wrote...
Luigi, what's your goal here? You don't give a crap. We do. End of. You're not gonna convince anyone here to not care.
Modifié par Luigitornado, 02 février 2012 - 02:21 .
#9886
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:21
JamesFaith wrote...
ZLurps wrote...
How did he delivered what character was feeling to readers. Was it like describing physical things, feeling nauseous after seeing something bad, or "Oh, that was bad" Master Chief thought grievengly? or something else?
Sorry, havenť this book in English, so I canť post it, because even translator had eliminated big part of Dietz specificstyle, this sentences is simply untranslatable. You must find it by that nasty hard dirty way - by reading another Dietz.
So your telling me that not even Google Translate could translate parts of this book....
smh
#9887
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:22
JamesFaith wrote...
ZLurps wrote...
How did he delivered what character was feeling to readers. Was it like describing physical things, feeling nauseous after seeing something bad, or "Oh, that was bad" Master Chief thought grievengly? or something else?
Sorry, havenť this book in English, so I canť post it, because even translator had eliminated big part of Dietz specificstyle, this sentences is simply untranslatable. You must find it by that nasty hard dirty way - by reading another Dietz.
NOOOO!!
Well, I see if I ever manage to do that. Thanks.
#9888
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:23
Luigitornado wrote...
Because it IS NOT a BIG deal. And if people want to complain about the book, then I have a right to complain about the complainers.didymos1120 wrote...
Luigi, what's your goal here? You don't give a crap. We do. End of. You're not gonna convince anyone here to not care.
That doesn't answer my question.
#9889
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:23
Luigitornado wrote...
Because it IS NOT a BIG deal. And if people want to complain about the book, then I have a right to complain about the complainers.didymos1120 wrote...
Luigi, what's your goal here? You don't give a crap. We do. End of. You're not gonna convince anyone here to not care.
To you. And you've made that clear. And pretty much everyone here disagrees with you. So what's you point?
Modifié par izmirtheastarach, 02 février 2012 - 02:24 .
#9890
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:25
Luigitornado wrote...
Because it IS NOT a BIG deal. And if people want to complain about the book, then I have a right to complain about the complainers.didymos1120 wrote...
Luigi, what's your goal here? You don't give a crap. We do. End of. You're not gonna convince anyone here to not care.
Make your own thread to complain about people complaining - it's our opinion that this is a big deal, and I'm sorry if you can't deal with opinions which differ from your own, but it's something you have to deal with.
And for those who care I'll be streaming a dramatic reading of the prologue in a couple of hours, as long as the technology cooperates.
Modifié par Yuoaman, 02 février 2012 - 02:26 .
#9891
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:25
#9892
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:25
izmirtheastarach wrote...
Luigitornado wrote...
Because it IS NOT a BIG deal. And if people want to complain about the book, then I have a right to complain about the complainers.didymos1120 wrote...
Luigi, what's your goal here? You don't give a crap. We do. End of. You're not gonna convince anyone here to not care.
To you. And you've made that clear. And pretty much everyone here disagrees with you. So what's you point?
He's trolling... cleverly I might add but still trolling
JamesFaith wrote...
Don't feed trolls. They maybe looks cute, but give them food once and they will come again and again for another.
Don't feed them after Midnight espiecally or bad things happen.
Modifié par nitefyre410, 02 février 2012 - 02:26 .
#9893
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:25
Luigitornado wrote...
Because it IS NOT a BIG deal. And if people want to complain about the book, then I have a right to complain about the complainers.didymos1120 wrote...
Luigi, what's your goal here? You don't give a crap. We do. End of. You're not gonna convince anyone here to not care.
If you want to defend the book, do so. Reference it, use examples, and explain why it can be justified in the ME universe and will have no impact on ME3 or the franchise.
Do not, however, come here to insult others and their opinions.
#9894
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:25
Costin_Razvan wrote...
Now that I think of it the sole purpose of the book was for TIM to get Grayson's body so he could make more Adjutants.
That's it. Everything else is just there for no real reason.
EDIT: Oh, you mean Paul Grayson. Yes, that looks like the point of the novel.
It's something they could've explained in one line in ME3.
____
Yeah, except he didn't get it, remember?
Kai Leng left he with a toothbrush sticking out of her neck and got off Omega.
It was up to Anderson and Kahlee to find her body.
That's the thing - I can't work out how it makes any sense for Cerberus to just kill her. She's one of the most powerful human biotics who has ever existed, and they have drugs that can easily strip a biotic of their power.
Heck, capturing and holding her for study could've even made a nice setup for future novels or ME3.
Modifié par ElitePinecone, 02 février 2012 - 02:26 .
#9895
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:25
There was a soft pop as the silencer did its job, the rifle butt kicked his shoulder, and the projectile spiraled down toward its target.
How would a silencer work with a mass accelerator weapon?
#9896
Guest_D3MON-SOVER3IGN_*
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:26
Guest_D3MON-SOVER3IGN_*
Luigitornado wrote...
Because it IS NOT a BIG deal. And if people want to complain about the book, then I have a right to complain about the complainers.didymos1120 wrote...
Luigi, what's your goal here? You don't give a crap. We do. End of. You're not gonna convince anyone here to not care.
Complaining about people complaining? That's one of the most pathetic things to complain about..
Why not just ignore those who complain? You'll save yourself some time.
#9897
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:26
Yes it doesLuigitornado wrote...
What is it that bothers you so much? Grow up.XXIceColdXX wrote...
Bioware please repond us! End this, and remove deception from canon.
Ive been pretty invested in the ME universe since it started, games,dlc,comics and novels. Ive always had high expectations from the Mass Effect team and have been able to live with any of the continuity errors that have shown up until now. But this novel takes the cake.
If Deception isn't removed or partially removed from canon, my faith in any future Mass Effect product will be seriously tarnished, which is very disappointing as I have thoroughly enjoyed the ME universe up till now.
Take the mistakes as mistakes in canon and be done with it. Does it really decrease the value of the Mass Effect universe?
If you don't care so much why are you here complaining about us caring?
#9898
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:27
Not really. Cerberus is pro-human. They are not trusted by other species (even humans) because of there reputation. Not really surprising.schwarzaj wrote...
Luigitornado wrote...
To be fair, all of the books, with exception of the first one. Have had minimal effects on the main story.jasonsantanna wrote...
**SPOILERS!**
How completely worthless is this novel when the entire plot contained within is MEANINGLESS? The only major outcome that occurs in Deception is that the three characters previously created in the novel Ascension - Gillian, Hendel, and Nick - are all randomly killed off at the very end for no other purpose other than to erase their existence from the Mass Effect universe. Other than that, nothing matters in this novel to the plot of the Mass Effect series, NOTHING - Anderson and Kahlee make no progress into investigating either Cerberus or the Reapers, the Council still actively dismisses the existence of the Reapers, there is no mention of the events of Arrival or the escalating tensions between the Alliance and the batarians over it, there is no active effort by Cerberus into any of their secret projects... none of the characters grow or evolve, none of the conflicts previously established in other Mass Effect media are resolved, nothing is any different for the Mass Effect universe or its characters from the beginning of this novel to its end, not a single darn thing..
Actually, the second book explained why the Quarians hated Cerberus so much, which was intergral to the first mission and Tali's story elements in ME2.
#9899
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:28
#9900
Posté 02 février 2012 - 02:28
didymos1120 wrote...
There was a soft pop as the silencer did its job, the rifle butt kicked his shoulder, and the projectile spiraled down toward its target.
How would a silencer work with a mass accelerator weapon?
Before we get to that... its a Suppressor and Deitz is supposed to be have experience writing Miltary Sci-Fi novels.
Secondly how does one suppress a mass accelerator weapon that does not use gun podwer ?




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





