Mass Effect: Deception Discussion Thread (Updated 2/2/2012) *Now with 30% more links!*
#1176
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 03:52
These PM's have one purpose- for all of us to get across the message that this book should not be canon- that it should be disavowed from the continuity.
Nothing else. No insults, no bad words, no curses. Nothing beyond that.
#1177
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 03:54
Modifié par Golden-Rose, 28 janvier 2012 - 04:00 .
#1178
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 03:55
And even here, in what seems to be the second thread of nothing but pure unadulterated negativity for the novel, we can show positivity by being mature about getting our message across to those involved.
Maturity and being well spoken in our intent- positivity.
So lets be positive about our negative feelings.
#1179
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 03:56
#1180
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 03:56
Golden-Rose wrote...
I like your suggestion Prince, but I have a question. Assuming this book was disvowed from the continuity, what of the characters? What happens to them? Are we to just assume that *SPOILERS*
How can they have? This book takes place either before or during Mass Effect 2. Before Retribution. Gillian is out to revenge her father before he is actually killed. It literally DOES NOT FIT in the universe. There is no need to pretend it does.
Modifié par izmirtheastarach, 28 janvier 2012 - 03:57 .
#1181
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 03:57
Golden-Rose wrote...
I like your suggestion Prince, but I have a question. Assuming this book was disvowed from the continuity, what of the characters? What happens to them? Are we to just assume that *SPOILERS*
Smart idea would be to not post spoilers, but to answer your question-
We don't know their involvement in ME3. We don't know what they say or do- if it RELIES on Deception, there's a problem. If not, then its perfectly fine to expunge the novel from the continuity of the novel series and grand continuity of the franchise.
#1182
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 03:58
izmirtheastarach wrote...
Golden-Rose wrote...
I like your suggestion Prince, but I have a question. Assuming this book was disvowed from the continuity, what of the characters? What happens to them? Are we to just assume that *SPOILERS*
How can they have? This book takes place either before or during Mass Effect 2. Before Retribution. Gillian is out to revenge her father before he is killed. It literally DOES NOT FIT in the universe. There is nothing to pretend.
This is obviously one of those 'for want of a nail' universes created sometime during the First Contact War. Most **** is the same, but Nick and Gillian were born earlier - and the lives of all major characters were all majorly affected.
#1183
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 03:59
#1184
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 03:59
If you take it as canon, I have no earthly idea what takes place before what. It's impossible to reconcile.
Modifié par izmirtheastarach, 28 janvier 2012 - 04:01 .
#1185
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 04:01
izmirtheastarach wrote...
Right. It literally takes place in an alternate universe. Because otherwise none of the references to time passing or contemporaneous events in any of the books make any sense.
It's a good thing the first three books take place in Universe-A43. Universe-K35 is just weird.
#1186
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 04:01
I'd bet money on it, because she's been the leading character of the novels since Revelation, and that book was made I believe prior to Mass Effect.
The rest of the characters I imagine won't have an involvement, cept for Leng as we all know.
I don't think it would be hard to say that Deception didn't happen.
#1187
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 04:04
LPPrince wrote...
I'm willing to bet Kahlee Sanders will be in ME3, I'm serious.
I'd bet money on it, because she's been the leading character of the novels since Revelation, and that book was made I believe prior to Mass Effect.
The rest of the characters I imagine won't have an involvement, cept for Leng as we all know.
I don't think it would be hard to say that Deception didn't happen.
Even the reference in ME2 didn't refer to those characters. Ysin'Mal is the only name that even crosses over.
#1188
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 04:05
#1189
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 04:06
Lucy_Glitter wrote...
I read that Gillian is now 18? How does that work?!
It doesn't, that's the problem.
#1190
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 04:07
Lucy_Glitter wrote...
I read that Gillian is now 18? How does that work?!
It doesn't.
In Mass Effect: Deception, Gillian's age is given as 18 and it is stated that six years have passed since she met Hendel Mitra at age 12 in Mass Effect: Ascension. This conflicts with Deception's place in the overall Mass Effect timeline. Ascension occurred in 2183 CE and Deception occurs prior to Mass Effect 3 in 2186 CE, so only three years could have passed; Gillian should be no older than 15 in Deception.
#1191
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 04:09
izmirtheastarach wrote...
LPPrince wrote...
I'm willing to bet Kahlee Sanders will be in ME3, I'm serious.
I'd bet money on it, because she's been the leading character of the novels since Revelation, and that book was made I believe prior to Mass Effect.
The rest of the characters I imagine won't have an involvement, cept for Leng as we all know.
I don't think it would be hard to say that Deception didn't happen.
Even the reference in ME2 didn't refer to those characters. Ysin'Mal is the only name that even crosses over.
Although not mentioned by name, Tali does mention a "Young human biotic" in one conversation.
#1192
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 04:11
Golden-Rose wrote...
izmirtheastarach wrote...
LPPrince wrote...
I'm willing to bet Kahlee Sanders will be in ME3, I'm serious.
I'd bet money on it, because she's been the leading character of the novels since Revelation, and that book was made I believe prior to Mass Effect.
The rest of the characters I imagine won't have an involvement, cept for Leng as we all know.
I don't think it would be hard to say that Deception didn't happen.
Even the reference in ME2 didn't refer to those characters. Ysin'Mal is the only name that even crosses over.
Although not mentioned by name, Tali does mention a "Young human biotic" in one conversation.
Yes, Tali alludes to Gillian. Also, there are a couple mentions to The Migrant Fleet's history with Cerberus, which is directly due to the events of Ascension.
#1193
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 04:21
#1194
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 04:29
izmirtheastarach wrote...
In his own book the timeline doesn't make sense. Two years since the battle of the citadel. Six years since Ascension, which would have to take place four years before Mass Effect 1.
Real timeline(novels and games)-
2165- Revelation
2183- Mass Effect
2183- Ascension
2185- Mass Effect 2
2186- Retribution
218err, what now? - Deception
I think I see the anomaly.
#1195
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 04:30
#1196
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 04:31
It takes place after retribution before Arrival.izmirtheastarach wrote...
Golden-Rose wrote...
I like your suggestion Prince, but I have a question. Assuming this book was disvowed from the continuity, what of the characters? What happens to them? Are we to just assume that *SPOILERS*
How can they have? This book takes place either before or during Mass Effect 2. Before Retribution. Gillian is out to revenge her father before he is actually killed. It literally DOES NOT FIT in the universe. There is no need to pretend it does.
#1197
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 04:33
dreman9999 wrote...
It takes place after retribution before Arrival.izmirtheastarach wrote...
Golden-Rose wrote...
I like your suggestion Prince, but I have a question. Assuming this book was disvowed from the continuity, what of the characters? What happens to them? Are we to just assume that *SPOILERS*
How can they have? This book takes place either before or during Mass Effect 2. Before Retribution. Gillian is out to revenge her father before he is actually killed. It literally DOES NOT FIT in the universe. There is no need to pretend it does.
That's where it should be, but the timeline is so inconsistent.
#1198
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 04:33
Lucy_Glitter wrote...
I read that Gillian is now 18? How does that work?!
Because the auther thinks 2170-2186=18...Duh....
#1199
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 04:34
dreman9999 wrote...
It takes place after retribution before Arrival.
Retribution specifically states that Grayson has been on the run for three years. Deception specifically states that it takes place two years after the Battle of the Citadel. How does this work exactly?
Again, there is no way to make if work without doing your own editing.
Modifié par izmirtheastarach, 28 janvier 2012 - 04:35 .
#1200
Posté 28 janvier 2012 - 04:36
More like the auther got the timeline wrong.....I just ignore it, just like the "earth people" comment. I'll rage on the book as much as anyone else but as long as they don't make the mistakes come over to ME3, I'm fine. I fine with Gillian being 18 in this book as long as she is 16-17 in ME3.Yuoaman wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
It takes place after retribution before Arrival.izmirtheastarach wrote...
Golden-Rose wrote...
I like your suggestion Prince, but I have a question. Assuming this book was disvowed from the continuity, what of the characters? What happens to them? Are we to just assume that *SPOILERS*
How can they have? This book takes place either before or during Mass Effect 2. Before Retribution. Gillian is out to revenge her father before he is actually killed. It literally DOES NOT FIT in the universe. There is no need to pretend it does.
That's where it should be, but the timeline is so inconsistent.
Modifié par dreman9999, 28 janvier 2012 - 04:37 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





