Mass Effect: Deception Discussion Thread (Updated 2/2/2012) *Now with 30% more links!*
#2301
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 07:26
#2302
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 07:27
Which I posted on facebook. It'll get more views that way.
#2303
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 07:28
#2304
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 07:30
#2305
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 07:36
#2306
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 07:39
Good on us though for being involved in this thread. So far, if counting the first thread I never saw, we'd be nearing 150 pages of pure negative reactions to the novel, and its not even supposed to be out yet.
#2307
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 07:44
Like?As bad as the book sounds, a lot of the errors on that Google doc are patently false.
#2308
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 07:44
#2309
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 07:45
Random Jerkface wrote...
Like?As bad as the book sounds, a lot of the errors on that Google doc are patently false.
I think they meant that the facts in the book were false - not that we had false examples.
#2310
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 07:47
Yuoaman wrote...
I imagine following the official release we'll have droves of fans looking for a place to complain with us.
Perhaps.
I wouldn't be surprised if this thread's popularity skyrocketed once the book was legitimately out for everyone to get on its actual release date and people needed a place to vent.
#2311
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 07:49
#2312
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 07:51
#2313
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 07:52
#2314
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 07:53
#2315
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 08:07
Yuoaman wrote...
Random Jerkface wrote...
Like?As bad as the book sounds, a lot of the errors on that Google doc are patently false.
I think they meant that the facts in the book were false - not that we had false examples.
No, I meant some of the "errors" presented as erroneous in the Google doc aren't. Or at best, require further description or context for the entry in the doc to make sense.
For example, the Citadel being "star-shaped" is correct depending on the angle from which you view it. From the front, with the arms open, the Citadel is plainly star-shaped, and is likened to a pentagram in the wiki. But never mind the wiki, just look at it for yourself.
Likewise, there appears to be entries in the doc of things presented in the book as facetious, one being that the quarians are referred to as "gas suckers". That is plainly derogatory, and while I haven't read the book I can't see that being said in a factual manner.
Biotics having different levels in their abilities is true. Some are better than others. That's pretty much a fact.
The entry about quarian clothing is also unnecessary. The quarians wear clothes above their suits. It's how they personalize them. And they include the items listed. The "motley" part is especially appropriate, given the quarian lifestyle.
Modifié par GnusmasTHX, 29 janvier 2012 - 08:13 .
#2316
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 08:13
DIIIIEEEEETTTZZZZ
#2317
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 08:15
You can't just go from a Level 2 to a Level 3 with hard work and perseverance unless this whole leveling system is first introduced in the novel.
There are L1s, L2s, etc etc and in order to get the higher numbered implants, you need retrofits or need to generally be younger to get the newer ones, like Adept Shepard being a L5x, Vanguard Shepard an L5n, and the Ascension Project's students getting L4's.
#2318
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 08:15
You wouldn't see anyone in the MEverse running around and saying that Jack is a Level 9001 biotic.
Modifié par Random Jerkface, 29 janvier 2012 - 08:21 .
#2319
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 08:17
#2320
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 08:17
The biotic "levels" as Dietz uses them are just odd though and just don't mesh with what we've seen. He uses them as rates of ability. "Nick is a level 2 biotic with the potential to be a level 3" The closest thing to this in existing lore is the L2 and L3, which are implants not levels.GnusmasTHX wrote...
Yuoaman wrote...
Random Jerkface wrote...
Like?As bad as the book sounds, a lot of the errors on that Google doc are patently false.
I think they meant that the facts in the book were false - not that we had false examples.
No, I meant some of the "errors" presented as erroneous in the Google doc aren't. Or at best, require further description or context for the entry in the doc to make sense.
For example, the Citadel being "star-shaped" is correct depending on the angle from which you view it. From the front, with the arms open, the Citadel is plainly star-shaped, and is likened to a pentagram in the wiki. But never mind the wiki, just look at it for yourself.
Likewise, there appears to be entries in the doc of things presented in the book as facetious, one being that the quarians are referred to as "gas suckers". That is plainly derogatory, and while I haven't read the book I can't see that being said in a factual manner.
Biotics having different levels in their abilities is true. Some are better than others. That's pretty much a fact.
The entry about quarian clothing is also unnecessary. The quarians were clothes above their suits. It's how they personalize them. And they include the items listed. The "motley" part is especially appropriate, given the quarian lifestyle.
Dietz makes no mention of the suits, he makes it sound like the Quarians only wear ramshackle clothing.
Modifié par Lord Aesir, 29 janvier 2012 - 08:18 .
#2321
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 08:18
See, it's quotes like these where I can't tell if the character is just an idiot and grasping at straws, or if Dietz honestly doesn't realise that biotic abilities aren't psychic powers."Biotics are naturally superior. We’re more intelligent thanks to the way our brains are put together"
#2322
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 08:19
#2323
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 08:20
Well, the character was fanatic belonging to something called "The Biotic Underground"Random Jerkface wrote...
See, it's quotes like these where I can't tell if the character is just an idiot and grasping at straws, or if Dietz honestly doesn't realise that biotic abilities aren't psychic powers."Biotics are naturally superior. We’re more intelligent thanks to the way our brains are put together"
#2324
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 08:20
Dunno what her original implants are, they're probably experimental Cerberus somethings-or-other. If you get her upgrade, though, she gets creates an L5x and gets retrofitted.LPPrince wrote...
What implant does Jack have, anyway? Isn't she an L5?
LOLWHATBRAINDAMAGE
#2325
Posté 29 janvier 2012 - 08:20
I don't think eezo was ever mentionedLPPrince wrote...
Did the book ever mention exposure to eezo and biotics in the same sentence?




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





