I don't get it why people are complaining about EDI's fembot shell. It was stated in the concept pic that she was meant to be an infiltrator with skin and hair (before she lost them), so as not to raise any suspicions. So it's only logical for her shell to have an appealing frame underneath
Appealing to whom?
Even if it was supposed to be a human disguise (was it?), what's the point of making it overly sexual? A modest shell would attract less attention.
-distinct female shape of EDI's shell would make it easier to associate with her voice, at least for me
You're not the entire playerbase. Besides, it's the military, fighting for Earth's survival, why would they care?
-Joker & EDI romance could be very fun to watch
As I said: appeasing fanfiction writers.
-If Tricia Helfer's character gets yet another a fembot body, it should at least look good
Characters have no obligation to be sexually appealing to anyone in particular.
Oh wait, I forgot: sex sells, and women don't play video games. *disappears in a poof of logic*