Please Note: Important! The following below is not a rant, bashing, nor a troll thread of any kind. It is simply ones own opinion. That being said, feel free to continue ahead.
The latest MassEffect 3-trailer released December of 2011, the voice in myhead noted; that Mass Effect had shiftedtowards something different... Something that was awaiting in thedepths of Dark Space.
Why has Mass Effect (largely influenced by thesequel), combine a mission layout that on average takes 30minuets to complete (slowly pacing one's self)?
Also, Mass Effect: 2 felt as though it had limited side-quest(s) options. (When does buying an engineupgrade count as a side-quest?).
It seems that Mass Effect: 1 had afairly well designed side-quest(s) layout than Mass Effect: 2. Although Mass Effect was rich in gameplay mechanics, felt as though some of the game was missing, (perhaps an all powerful publisher assumed control?).
But I can hypothesize that the publisher(Electronic Arts) wanted a sequel with additional shelf-life(to continue to create a profit, well after the original launch)? It could be possiblethat the publisher,over the last few years might have encouraged or demanded their partners to design a sort of download-able content viaon-line access code(s), in-order to have additional feature(s) of theproduct unlocked. Example., on-line code(s) that are required formultiplayer, the source listed below can explain in greater detail. But if thats true, does that mean I buy a game that missing objects, stories, etc?
Fell free to leave a comment.
Mass Effect Past and Future
Débuté par
CYLON Base Ship 0011 END OF LINE
, janv. 27 2012 11:57
Retour en haut
#2
Posté 27 janvier 2012 - 11:59
Extort
-
- Members
- 122 messages
CYLON Base Ship 0011 END OF LINE wrote...
Please Note: Important! The following below is not a rant, bashing, nor a troll thread of any kind. It is simply ones own opinion. That being said, feel free to continue ahead.
The latest MassEffect 3-trailer released December of 2011, the voice in myhead noted; that Mass Effect had shiftedtowards something different... Something that was awaiting in thedepths of Dark Space.
Why has Mass Effect (largely influenced by thesequel), combine a mission layout that on average takes 30minuets to complete (slowly pacing one's self)?
Also, Mass Effect: 2 felt as though it had limited side-quest(s) options. (When does buying an engineupgrade count as a side-quest?).
It seems that Mass Effect: 1 had afairly well designed side-quest(s) layout than Mass Effect: 2. Although Mass Effect was rich in gameplay mechanics, felt as though some of the game was missing, (perhaps an all powerful publisher assumed control?).
But I can hypothesize that the publisher(Electronic Arts) wanted a sequel with additional shelf-life(to continue to create a profit, well after the original launch)? It could be possiblethat the publisher,over the last few years might have encouraged or demanded their partners to design a sort of download-able content viaon-line access code(s), in-order to have additional feature(s) of theproduct unlocked. Example., on-line code(s) that are required formultiplayer, the source listed below can explain in greater detail. But if thats true, does that mean I buy a game that missing objects, stories, etc?
Fell free to leave a comment.
a well desinged layout? driving around in a mako in rediculous places for one mission is a well designed layout?
