Dean_the_Young wrote...
I don't think you can deny that Garrus is returning because he's a fan favorite, given that fandom was the stated reason for Garrus and Tali's appearance in ME2.
MOST of the ME2 cast contributed very little to ME2's main story. We could have had just Miranda (pro Cerb), Jack (anti Cerb), Mordin (other side of genophage conflict), and Legion (other side of geth conflict). But everyone else had great character arcs, which, in my opinion, WERE ME2's story. I liked having them aboard, and busting up Omega, hunting down Sidonis, fighting my way through Haestrom, and gettin' sassy with the quarian admiralty board was hella fun.
Characters have to contribute to the story to be warranted. They're simply too much an investment to do otherwise. A character can have merit based on their addition to the storylines (the VS), their function as a plot device (Liara), their expansion of the lore (Vega as the 'new guy' viewpoint to introduce/reintroduce many things), or seeking the approval via a certain reaction from the audience (lust, from Miranda in ME2).
Awesome bro points and throwing a bone to ME1 players wasn't "seeking approval via a certain reaction from the audience?"
As a character, however, Garrus doesn't bring much except his fanbase. Garrus was never a codex on legs or a lore source: he told tales of his personal adventures, but never much about the Turian Heirarchy. Garrus has not lingering storyline, bar possibly a romance: the 'I'll go join the Spectres/C-SEC' was jetissoned in order to reuse him in ME2, and the Sidonis issue was the last loose end of everything but helping Shepard. Garrus has no basis or foreshadowing as being a key plot device (as a killable character, he can't be), and is highly unlikely to bring a new viewpoint to old issues given his character is a 'old war buddy' sort with a theme of continuity.
I honestly think that the revenge vs forgiveness/mercy vs justice plotline that Garrus brought to the table was one of the most powerful and interesting diversions ME2 offered. It made me think, but more importantly, it made me
feel. That made a difference in the story for me and for a lot of people that never even touched ME1.
Garrus doesn't add much to the story, or the narrative, or even to the combat that couldn't be covered by most other ME2 companions. The primary thing that sets Garrus apart is the size of his fanbase.
It's a shame, but it's more true than not.
Like I said, over half of ME2's squadmates could have been cut (and you may have thought it a better game for it), but I personally liked that they were included. The squad was the reason I enjoyed ME2 so much.
(Personally, I would have kept Garrus out of ME2 and brought him back in ME3 as either a C-SEC officer or SPECTRE to help Shepard. The whole vigilante/sidonis thing was pretty superficial for Garrus in the first place, and there's no reason to open him up to being killed and deny the player a ME3 companion.)
That may have worked, but then I wouldn't have got to shag him.
Us female gamers have perverse sexual desires to fulfill too, you know.
EDIT: Okay, did I kill all the typos? Please tell me I killed all the typos.
Modifié par AdmiralCheez, 29 janvier 2012 - 06:02 .