Aller au contenu

Photo

BioWare announces ME3 cast


1393 réponses à ce sujet

#1101
Yakko77

Yakko77
  • Members
  • 2 794 messages

nightcobra8928 wrote...

i want to see this new reporter hijack a "mud slinging campaign by al-jilani" and show what shepard's been doing to save the galaxy humiliating al-jilani again in the process:lol:.


..and then have Diana punch her!  She's have a secure spot on the Normandy with that act!  LOL!

#1102
jabajack

jabajack
  • Members
  • 112 messages

nightcobra8928 wrote...

i want to see this new reporter hijack a "mud slinging campaign by al-jilani" and show what shepard's been doing to save the galaxy humiliating al-jilani again in the process:lol:.


or for a side mission she sneaks off with shep and crew trying to film fighting geth/cerberus/husks...hmm in fact that would be a funny way of starting the romance, having to save her behind we have the choice of flirting or an Al-Jilani style punch

#1103
Shiro_the_Gambler

Shiro_the_Gambler
  • Members
  • 387 messages
That would be interesting, indeed.

#1104
Adanu

Adanu
  • Members
  • 1 400 messages

CerberusSoldier wrote...

Kia Purity wrote...

Seriously though, I wonder if Bioware has considered that they may have tripped into an ethnics violation issue with hiring of Chobot. Even if it's a small part, the fact is that they hired a gaming reporter for a game makes it look like they're "buying" their way to a perfect score, even if that's not the intent. Someone didn't think this through.

   


No because Jessica Chobot is a voice actress . and plus she no longer does gaming stuff for IGN and she has a non gaming show on G4 . you people need to do some stinking research for once . really what crime did EA commit please tell me oh thats right none . Oh and one other thing Jessica never did any game reviews at IGN she was a on camera talent . who only reported on the big njews items for IGN's Daily Fix. it pays to do some simple research


Asking people here to do research instead of knee jerk crap here is like asking the moon to stop projecting tidal forces.

#1105
Brian.V3

Brian.V3
  • Members
  • 204 messages

Adanu wrote...

CerberusSoldier wrote...

Kia Purity wrote...

Seriously though, I wonder if Bioware has considered that they may have tripped into an ethnics violation issue with hiring of Chobot. Even if it's a small part, the fact is that they hired a gaming reporter for a game makes it look like they're "buying" their way to a perfect score, even if that's not the intent. Someone didn't think this through.

   


No because Jessica Chobot is a voice actress . and plus she no longer does gaming stuff for IGN and she has a non gaming show on G4 . you people need to do some stinking research for once . really what crime did EA commit please tell me oh thats right none . Oh and one other thing Jessica never did any game reviews at IGN she was a on camera talent . who only reported on the big njews items for IGN's Daily Fix. it pays to do some simple research


Asking people here to do research instead of knee jerk crap here is like asking the moon to stop projecting tidal forces.


Or simply put if she actually does a "Official" review for the game for either IGN or G4 will she jeopardize the integrity for IGN/G4 and BioWare. She made this clear in her blog with CAPS.

#1106
Xeranx

Xeranx
  • Members
  • 2 255 messages

G3rman wrote...

Every time I see someone talk about exclusive with Emily Wong, I have to wonder how many just bring it up so they can have a chance to take an Asian to bed. I mean really..


I don't find that to be a fair statement to make.  For me, I never thought about taking Emily to bed.  I did want to make good on the exclusive interview deal that never materialized.  First it was Al-Jilani interviewing Shepard in C-Sec in Mass Effect.  I was wondering if this was the exclusive interview I had already promised to Emily.  Then there was me being interviewed again by Al-Jilani in ME2 and not seeing Emily Wong anywhere except on some monitor should I choose to activate it.  Meaning I could completely miss it, but Al-Jilani is standing on the top floor of Zakera Ward (imagine that luck) as a silhouette (?) down a ways from Mouse.  

In fact, you have three separate chances to run into her if you're not concerned about only visiting the Citadel when you have missions and/or exploring:  buying equipment, doing the fish on the Citadel side-mission for the Krogans, and Thane's loyalty mission.  And that's all on the off-chance that you'll continue the punching gag that was started in the first game.

Frankly, with the way things are, I'd rather have Al-Jilani taking place of Diane Allers showing growth in her character if Emily Wong isn't going to be used properly (and yes I don't feel she's being used properly. My opinion. Deal with it).  She got tired of baiting people and decided to be a real journalist.

nitefyre410 wrote...
^ So this especially the boled ... because you get it finally someone the gets it/  so many have of us have been saying this.... some through veilled humor, others just saying like yourself  just straight up say. 

Whats sad is the people making objectification agruement at every turn - Some make valid points others you can see are completly  full of it.  The latter are really doing a disservice to the over all debate of how woman are protrayed because there  is now this false dichotomy  being created... that kills any kind of diversity when it comes to apperance and character.  

You judge the character for the character not the appearance of the character 

Unfortunately, we've gone to the realm of iconic looks.  You can so judge a character based on appearance before getting to know them.  Why? Because the creators designed them that way.  A character's design (with regard to iconic looks) has to fit what the overall idea of who the character is.  

No iconic looks, then there's nothing to judge until you get the game.  Iconic looks, on the other hand, begs that you form an opinion on what's being viewed or what is expected to be viewed by the public.  If that isn't the case then there shouldn't be a reveal of characters before the game is released as far as I'm concerned.

#1107
Nashiktal

Nashiktal
  • Members
  • 5 584 messages

Xeranx wrote...
Unfortunately, we've gone to the realm of iconic looks.  You can so judge a character based on appearance before getting to know them.  Why? Because the creators designed them that way.  A character's design (with regard to iconic looks) has to fit what the overall idea of who the character is.  

No iconic looks, then there's nothing to judge until you get the game.  Iconic looks, on the other hand, begs that you form an opinion on what's being viewed or what is expected to be viewed by the public.  If that isn't the case then there shouldn't be a reveal of characters before the game is released as far as I'm concerned.


This, so much this. Bioware has been pushing the iconic look mandate so hard they put a human half naked in the atmosphere of a superhot brown dwarf. The characters are designed to look a certain way as an aspect of their character.

Compare thane an assassin to zaeed a mercenary. We are meant to judge these characters by their looks, and first impression of chobot is a tanktop dress thing that looks like a wierd swimsuit and the most cleavage I have ever seen in the Mass Effect series.

I don't know anything about her character, but first impressions are negative so far.

Edit: Although on the bright side after seeing more screenshots I can see that the uncanney valley is caused by lighting, and not from a poor face scan. So that's a plus.

Modifié par Nashiktal, 01 février 2012 - 07:19 .


#1108
sheppard7

sheppard7
  • Members
  • 1 493 messages
Now that I know one is voiced by Freddie Prince Jr, he's going to die in my playthroughs if possible.

#1109
hotdogbsg

hotdogbsg
  • Members
  • 832 messages

Edit: Although on the bright side after seeing more screenshots I can see that the uncanney valley is caused by lighting, and not from a poor face scan. So that's a plus.


More screenshots? Where are they?

Modifié par hotdogbsg, 01 février 2012 - 08:03 .


#1110
Alex_SM

Alex_SM
  • Members
  • 662 messages

nightcobra8928 wrote...

legion999 wrote...

insomniac13 wrote...

Why on earth would Bioware hire a first-time actress to play one of the major new characters in ME3? It just seems like blatant fan-service!


Major? She's a reporter.


i guess anyone's who's on the normandy nowadays is a major character to the series, like our cook/janitor and his epic quest of grocery shopping.


She must be an important one, because she has been publicited over confirmed-squadmate voiceactors

#1111
Nashiktal

Nashiktal
  • Members
  • 5 584 messages

hotdogbsg wrote...

Edit: Although on the bright side after seeing more screenshots I can see that the uncanney valley is caused by lighting, and not from a poor face scan. So that's a plus.


More screenshots? Where are they?


When I say more screenshots,  I mean I saw the other two besides the one shot where there are shadows all over her face. She looks fine otherwise.

#1112
SyrielOne

SyrielOne
  • Members
  • 3 messages

Kia Purity wrote...

Seriously though, I wonder if Bioware has considered that they may have tripped into an ethnics violation issue with hiring of Chobot. Even if it's a small part, the fact is that they hired a gaming reporter for a game makes it look like they're "buying" their way to a perfect score, even if that's not the intent. Someone didn't think this through.


You're not the only one who thinks that.

'EA and G4 TV's Mass Effect 3 Ethics Issue'
http://worthplaying....itorials/84961/



"While this is no doubt great news for Chobot, as she's getting a chance to contribute to a top-tier video game from one of her favorite developers, the way the announcement was handled presents a bit of an ethical quandary for both EA and G4 TV.

Why?

Because a mere two weeks ago, G4 TV had Chobot previewing Mass Effect 3 in her capacity as a journalist.
No matter how you slice it, this looks bad."

Modifié par SyrielOne, 01 février 2012 - 08:19 .


#1113
Tazzmission

Tazzmission
  • Members
  • 10 619 messages

SyrielOne wrote...

Kia Purity wrote...

Seriously though, I wonder if Bioware has considered that they may have tripped into an ethnics violation issue with hiring of Chobot. Even if it's a small part, the fact is that they hired a gaming reporter for a game makes it look like they're "buying" their way to a perfect score, even if that's not the intent. Someone didn't think this through.


You're not the only one who thinks that.

'EA and G4 TV's Mass Effect 3 Ethics Issue'
http://worthplaying....itorials/84961/



"While this is no doubt great news for Chobot, as she's getting a chance to contribute to a top-tier video game from one of her favorite developers, the way the announcement was handled presents a bit of an ethical quandary for both EA and G4 TV.

Why?

Because a mere two weeks ago, G4 TV had Chobot previewing Mass Effect 3 in her capacity as a journalist.
No matter how you slice it, this looks bad."



:sigh: so you believe an article over your own judgement when the games out?

so freaking what she did me3 on g4 tv! ever stop to realize that maybe mass effect could help chobots career? heck look at freddie prinz jr. that man hasnt done anything since scooby doo and for all we know me3 could help his career.


im not knocking the cast hell i enjoy what i heard  but seriously use your brain people before you speak

#1114
SyrielOne

SyrielOne
  • Members
  • 3 messages

Tazzmission wrote...

:sigh: so you believe an article over your own judgement when the games out?

so freaking what she did me3 on g4 tv! ever stop to realize that maybe mass effect could help chobots career? heck look at freddie prinz jr. that man hasnt done anything since scooby doo and for all we know me3 could help his career.


im not knocking the cast hell i enjoy what i heard  but seriously use your brain people before you speak


It honestly doesn't matter if the game is good or bad. 
 
When someone who worked on the game (note that she started working with Bioware around a year ago) also reports on it as a journalist, it looks like a straight up conflict of interest.
 
I'd be saying the same if it were anyone from Bioware or EA there "reporting" on the game. Casey is a great guy, but does anyone here think he's not biased for the game? He worked on it.
 
If he showed up at any outlet "reporting" on ME3 it would be a conflict of interest.

If you don't believe that, then why do we even have gaming sites? Shouldn't everyone just get their news straight from the corporate PR teams, complete with the spin that the publisher/producer wants?

#1115
G3rman

G3rman
  • Members
  • 2 382 messages
Making a big deal out of nothing.

#1116
DiegoProgMetal

DiegoProgMetal
  • Members
  • 523 messages

SpiritBraker wrote...

http://desmond.image....png&res=medium

Not that impressive,

but everything else was great.


I was trying to get a screen from the same moment. I think it's were we can see the best. Here's what I could get, almost the same...
Image IPB

Edit: right-click, copy the adress and paste on another tab to see the full size.

Modifié par DiegoProgMetal, 01 février 2012 - 08:54 .


#1117
Tazzmission

Tazzmission
  • Members
  • 10 619 messages

SyrielOne wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

:sigh: so you believe an article over your own judgement when the games out?

so freaking what she did me3 on g4 tv! ever stop to realize that maybe mass effect could help chobots career? heck look at freddie prinz jr. that man hasnt done anything since scooby doo and for all we know me3 could help his career.


im not knocking the cast hell i enjoy what i heard  but seriously use your brain people before you speak


It honestly doesn't matter if the game is good or bad. 
 
When someone who worked on the game (note that she started working with Bioware around a year ago) also reports on it as a journalist, it looks like a straight up conflict of interest.
 
I'd be saying the same if it were anyone from Bioware or EA there "reporting" on the game. Casey is a great guy, but does anyone here think he's not biased for the game? He worked on it.
 
If he showed up at any outlet "reporting" on ME3 it would be a conflict of interest.

If you don't believe that, then why do we even have gaming sites? Shouldn't everyone just get their news straight from the corporate PR teams, complete with the spin that the publisher/producer wants?



how do we know this wont have chobot skyrocket into something else based on her success with the game? your to quick to agree with what a gaming site says before you played the game yet talk to the charachter in game.

look at mark meer the guy is more known for shepard than carth from kotor. give it time and meer will be in movies because the man is good at what he does.

#1118
Drone223

Drone223
  • Members
  • 6 659 messages
Why shouldn't I be surprised that BSN yet again make's a big deal out of some minor details

#1119
clovis212

clovis212
  • Members
  • 9 messages
I would gladly suck off whoever she sucked off to get the job if it meant she would be dropped out of the game.

#1120
GamerrangerX

GamerrangerX
  • Members
  • 306 messages
Diana Allers,she work got G4 TV as a game reporter?i hope G4 TV not gonna by bias,gonna look for another souce for good review.

#1121
Guest_magnetite_*

Guest_magnetite_*
  • Guests
I looked at her acting career. Don't people usually start small and work their way up? Most people start acting doing plays and small stuff. They usually don't start with big AAA titles like Mass Effect 3.

#1122
clovis212

clovis212
  • Members
  • 9 messages
Exactly....because of Chobot's hiring, there goes my faith in IGN and G4TV's "unbiased" review. Gametrailers FTW baby!

#1123
Atakuma

Atakuma
  • Members
  • 5 609 messages

magnetite wrote...

I looked at her acting career. Don't people usually start small and work their way up? Most people start acting doing plays and small stuff. They usually don't start with big AAA titles like Mass Effect 3.

Doing a voicover in a videogame isn't exactly the big leagues.

#1124
Nashiktal

Nashiktal
  • Members
  • 5 584 messages

Tazzmission wrote...

SyrielOne wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

:sigh: so you believe an article over your own judgement when the games out?

so freaking what she did me3 on g4 tv! ever stop to realize that maybe mass effect could help chobots career? heck look at freddie prinz jr. that man hasnt done anything since scooby doo and for all we know me3 could help his career.


im not knocking the cast hell i enjoy what i heard  but seriously use your brain people before you speak


It honestly doesn't matter if the game is good or bad. 
 
When someone who worked on the game (note that she started working with Bioware around a year ago) also reports on it as a journalist, it looks like a straight up conflict of interest.
 
I'd be saying the same if it were anyone from Bioware or EA there "reporting" on the game. Casey is a great guy, but does anyone here think he's not biased for the game? He worked on it.
 
If he showed up at any outlet "reporting" on ME3 it would be a conflict of interest.

If you don't believe that, then why do we even have gaming sites? Shouldn't everyone just get their news straight from the corporate PR teams, complete with the spin that the publisher/producer wants?



how do we know this wont have chobot skyrocket into something else based on her success with the game? your to quick to agree with what a gaming site says before you played the game yet talk to the charachter in game.

look at mark meer the guy is more known for shepard than carth from kotor. give it time and meer will be in movies because the man is good at what he does.






Wut? Meer never voiced carth.

#1125
Xeranx

Xeranx
  • Members
  • 2 255 messages

Tazzmission wrote...

SyrielOne wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

:sigh: so you believe an article over your own judgement when the games out?

so freaking what she did me3 on g4 tv! ever stop to realize that maybe mass effect could help chobots career? heck look at freddie prinz jr. that man hasnt done anything since scooby doo and for all we know me3 could help his career.


im not knocking the cast hell i enjoy what i heard  but seriously use your brain people before you speak


It honestly doesn't matter if the game is good or bad. 
 
When someone who worked on the game (note that she started working with Bioware around a year ago) also reports on it as a journalist, it looks like a straight up conflict of interest.
 
I'd be saying the same if it were anyone from Bioware or EA there "reporting" on the game. Casey is a great guy, but does anyone here think he's not biased for the game? He worked on it.
 
If he showed up at any outlet "reporting" on ME3 it would be a conflict of interest.

If you don't believe that, then why do we even have gaming sites? Shouldn't everyone just get their news straight from the corporate PR teams, complete with the spin that the publisher/producer wants?



how do we know this wont have chobot skyrocket into something else based on her success with the game? your to quick to agree with what a gaming site says before you played the game yet talk to the charachter in game.

look at mark meer the guy is more known for shepard than carth from kotor. give it time and meer will be in movies because the man is good at what he does.


Your concern is on Chobot's career getting a boost.  I don't think that's what Syriels getting at.  Actually I want to claim that it isn't what Syriel's getting at, but I'll take the safe path.  This looks like nepotism or rubbing of elbows for favors to some people.  Having someone who is recognized as a journalist (putting it out there that I've seen the name, but I've never known who she was) talk about a new product you're releasing and is going to be featured in the game demonstrates a conflict of interest.

Also I do want to mention that this is also not a positive method of growing your brand with regard to Chobot.  Why?  Because it makes her an easy mark.  I can imagine a company deciding to use her as a voice over actress so long as she does a favorable story on the product she's working on.  Even if a statement is made that there's no bias on her part, everyone else will maintain that she's going to have a biased viewpoint which is usually why things like this aren't done.  It would be like Roger Ebert reviewing a movie he directed.  Why would anyone want to listen to what he has to say about his own movie when he dons his professional critics cap after he just took of his director's cap?  He has no objective viewpoint at that stage because it's his work.