G3rman wrote...
Every time I see someone talk about exclusive with Emily Wong, I have to wonder how many just bring it up so they can have a chance to take an Asian to bed. I mean really..
I don't find that to be a fair statement to make. For me, I never thought about taking Emily to bed. I did want to make good on the exclusive interview deal that never materialized. First it was Al-Jilani interviewing Shepard in C-Sec in Mass Effect. I was wondering if this was the exclusive interview I had
already promised to Emily. Then there was me being interviewed again by Al-Jilani in ME2 and not seeing Emily Wong anywhere except on some monitor should I
choose to activate it. Meaning I could completely miss it, but Al-Jilani is standing on the top floor of Zakera Ward (imagine that luck) as a silhouette (?) down a ways from Mouse.
In fact, you have three separate chances to run into her if you're not concerned about only visiting the Citadel when you have missions and/or exploring: buying equipment, doing the fish on the Citadel side-mission for the Krogans, and Thane's loyalty mission. And that's all on the off-chance that you'll continue the punching gag that was started in the first game.
Frankly, with the way things are, I'd rather have Al-Jilani taking place of Diane Allers showing growth in her character if Emily Wong isn't going to be used properly (and yes I don't feel she's being used properly. My opinion. Deal with it). She got tired of baiting people and decided to be a real journalist.
nitefyre410 wrote...
^ So this especially the boled ... because you get it finally someone the gets it/ so many have of us have been saying this.... some through veilled humor, others just saying like yourself just straight up say.
Whats sad is the people making objectification agruement at every turn - Some make valid points others you can see are completly full of it. The latter are really doing a disservice to the over all debate of how woman are protrayed because there is now this false dichotomy being created... that kills any kind of diversity when it comes to apperance and character.
You judge the character for the character not the appearance of the character
Unfortunately, we've gone to the realm of iconic looks. You can so judge a character based on appearance before getting to know them. Why? Because the creators designed them that way. A character's design (with regard to iconic looks) has to fit what the overall idea of who the character is.
No iconic looks, then there's nothing to judge until you get the game. Iconic looks, on the other hand, begs that you form an opinion on what's being viewed or what is expected to be viewed by the public. If that isn't the case then there shouldn't be a reveal of characters before the game is released as far as I'm concerned.