AdmiralCheez wrote...
Vent Kid is not a squadmate.Alex Arterius wrote...
I guess there is that kid in the vents?
Bioware is boldly going where Bioware has never gone before.
I have seen the opening. Or at least something that will be very similar to it. I also have seen Vega's dialogue and I've accepted the undeniable truth that he will end up being awesome.Saphra Deden wrote...
Not very nice to judge it when you haven't even seen it for yourself, right?
Modifié par Someone With Mass, 03 février 2012 - 12:33 .
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
I pretty much dislike the opening of any video game, and I have no doubt that the first part of ME3 will be the worst part of the game for me.Someone With Mass wrote...
So he thinks that ME2's opening is superb, but ME3's is boring?
Wat.
Watch ME2's intro more than three times. Bet you it won't be as appealing then.
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Saphra Deden wrote...
From what I've seen of the opening I actually think it should be a little slower to first build some tension before the Reapers appear.
Modifié par Alex Arterius, 03 février 2012 - 12:41 .
Guest_Arcian_*
That was because the whole consequence system people like you expected is not economically feasible. If they're going to make every single choice in the first game alter the sequel radically, we're looking at a development time 300% longer and a budget on the level of SWTOR. Either that, or massive, mountain-sized cuts in areas critical to the game's stability and polish.Terror_K wrote...
Whether Ashley or Kaidan actually die or not, it does make it sound like they're taken out of much of the game until later on. If true, this just smacks of laziness and BioWare once again simply sweeping things under the rug and pushing them aside, etc. like they did for many of the consequences going into ME2.
Please just shut the f**k up. You obviously have no understanding whatsoever about the limitations of game development.Terror_K wrote...
They've basically gone, "instead of providing a lot of deep, varied and rich content for players throughout the game with these two different squadmates making a proper return, let's just wound them really severely and cut them out of most of it so we don't have to deal with it!"
That's your ENTIRE PROBLEM, you ****. You inflate your expectations until they're the size of f**king Jupiter, and then you have the gall to come here and whine like a b!tch about being let down?Terror_K wrote...
Pathetic! And I'm supposed to believe that ME3 has meaningful consequences from our imports, why?
The Spamming Troll wrote...
the author said "the superb has-that-really-happened opening of Mass Effect 2"
stopped reading.
Modifié par Nashiktal, 03 février 2012 - 12:46 .
Guest_Arcian_*
Mission success?Nashiktal wrote...
WTF arcian, your avatar! Goddamit.
>
You make it hard to even read your posts when all I can focus on is the raping of my childhood.
So, the VS dies on Mars itself! So much for treating VS importantly in ME3! One of my Shepards romanced Ashley.CerberusSoldier wrote...
the bottom part makes me happy with the VS
Modifié par robarcool, 03 février 2012 - 12:57 .
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
Don't worry; they're not dead, just injured.robarcool wrote...
So, the VS dies on Mars itself! So much for treating VS importantly in ME3! One of my Shepard's romanced Ashley.CerberusSoldier wrote...
the bottom part makes me happy with the VS
If this is indeed the final death of VS, then I would say it was a very small role that the VS was given.<_<
robarcool wrote...
So, the VS dies on Mars itself! So much for treating VS importantly in ME3! One of my Shepard's romanced Ashley.CerberusSoldier wrote...
the bottom part makes me happy with the VS
If this is indeed the final death of VS, then I would say it was a very small role that the VS was given.<_<
Oh, then John Shepard is happy!AdmiralCheez wrote...
Kaishley is just critically injured and makes a comeback later.CerberusSoldier wrote...
how can it be when its the first 90 mins really are you saying those pieces of scum survive
Arcian wrote...
*Several mad ravings*
Terror_K wrote...
snipArcian wrote...
*Several mad ravings*
Modifié par Epic777, 03 février 2012 - 01:17 .
Nashiktal wrote...
To be fair to bioware, they lost countless work hours on ME2 because of a disease (I think it was a flu, one of the bigger ones) knocking out their workers for long periods of time.
Modifié par Praetor Shepard, 03 février 2012 - 01:20 .
Modifié par SamT3N7, 03 février 2012 - 01:24 .
Arcian wrote...
Please just shut the f**k up. You obviously have no...
That's your ENTIRE PROBLEM, you ****
.... you have the gall to come here and whine like a b!tch...
...Grow the f**k up.
A Golden Dragon wrote...
The Kaidan/Ashley dieing in the first mission is being beleived because Bioware DID hype up one character, and killed her after 1 (yes ONE) mission (Mhairi from Dragon Age: Awakening).
Interesting story, tho...
Guest_Arcian_*
Mass Effect is a game, not an interactive book. These changes are game mechanics, i.e the core f***ing features of the game.Terror_K wrote...
If they could do it with the small amount of times they did manage to pull it off, then they can do it for the rest. Would it really take that much more effort to simply record more dialogue for the Virmire Survivor and add a little more for them? Sure, they can waste time programming in silly melee stuff, Kinect support, multiplayer
This, on the other hand, is not a good change, and I can agree on that. Chobot's inclusion into the game suggests a bad and unhealthy relationship between BioWare and IGN. The worst thing I know is when the press allows themselves to be bought, as it violates all of my principles as a journalist.Terror_K wrote...
and adding Chobots T&A character
Could (or should) they have cut Chobot to give them more screentime? Yes. Have they? No. Will they change it at this point? No. I don't see why you should spend energy whining about it.Terror_K wrote...
but they can't give Kaidan or Ashley a bit more screentime?
>Taking marketing seriouslyTerror_K wrote...
Also, if BioWare wasn't really capable of delivering on such claims, perhaps they shouldn't of made them in the first place. They're the ones who talked about this being an epic trilogy from the get go where you take one character across three games and your choices and consequences really matter and have a significant impact on things. And they're still claiming ME3 pulls this off, saying it does it better than ME2. They should either put up, or shut up.
Retour en haut