260 réponses à ce sujet

[Nashiktal]

Arcian wrote...

Nashiktal wrote...

WTF arcian, your avatar! Goddamit.

>

You make it hard to even read your posts when all I can focus on is the raping of my childhood.

Mission success? 

I will never see the thornberries in the same light again. Does that count?

[SolidBeast]

Arcian wrote...

SolidBeast wrote...

Arcian wrote...

Please just shut the f**k up. You obviously have no...
That's your ENTIRE PROBLEM, you ****
.... you have the gall to come here and whine like a b!tch...
...Grow the f**k up.

Wow, really? I thought you were a mature poster. Must have mixed you up with someone else.

Being nice is only productive to a point. Terror_K has crossed that point and is now lightyears beyond it.

Whereas being an a**hole is never productive and only serves to ruin your credibility. Whatever point the other poster crossed, they still have enough tact not to throw around petty insults.

Modifié par SolidBeast, 03 février 2012 - 01:38 .

[AdmiralCheez]

jreezy wrote...

The start of the Reaper invasion is dull? And here I thought I was jaded.

I suppose some people get tired of huge explosions after awhile.

I don't.  Because I'm an American.  Explosions are patriotic.

Also there is fighting in this thread.  I'm going to ask y'all to cut it out.  Arcian, in you I am disappoint.

[Terror_K]

Arcian wrote...

Mass Effect is a game, not an interactive book.

Funny, because I remember some of the earliest comments to sell the original Mass Effect was the fact that it was basically your own interactive science fiction story where you got to make the decisions.

These changes are game mechanics, i.e the core f***ing features of the game[/i][i].

They weren't "core f***ing features" of the previous two games in the series. Why the hell should they be core features now? They're superfluous and unnecessary, IMO. Especially the Kinect which isn't even part of two of the three versions of the game. If it's a "core mechanic" then how does that work exactly?

If you're only looking for stats and storytelling in games, you should really drop video games and go back to pen and paper.

Funny... up until recently I used to be able to have both. For 25 years I could have that in both pen and paper, and when playing video games. BioWare video games at that. Now, that's no longer the case, clearly.

>Taking marketing seriously
>Ever
What are you, 2 years old?

I see. So, it's okay to take all the other marketing you like seriously that illustrates the things you enjoy about the game and that accurately represent it, but when it not okay to believe the same marketing when it's false, misrepresents the game and has stuff you don't like?

It's all the same marketing stuff, but you'll cheer and clap when it's okay and take it all in, then chastise me for pointing out the cracks? Okay... sure...

Modifié par Terror_K, 03 février 2012 - 01:40 .

[Nashiktal]

AdmiralCheez wrote...

jreezy wrote...

The start of the Reaper invasion is dull? And here I thought I was jaded.

I suppose some people get tired of huge explosions after awhile.

I don't.  Because I'm an American.  Explosions are patriotic.

Also there is fighting in this thread.  I'm going to ask y'all to cut it out.  Arcian, in you I am disappoint.

I would normally argue with arcian but he raped my childhood. My arguments are invalid.

[AdmiralCheez]

Saphra Deden wrote...

Arcian has never been a mature poster, just FYI.

Pretty legit most of the time, though.  Which is why this most recent outburst is surprising.

That said, I don't think being mean or nice matters as long as you make a valid point.

You know that thing about the flies and the honey that people go on about?

[Chala]

Arcian wrote...

Nashiktal wrote...

Arcian wrote...

Nashiktal wrote...

WTF arcian, your avatar! Goddamit.

>

You make it hard to even read your posts when all I can focus on is the raping of my childhood.

Mission success? 

I will never see the thornberries in the same light again. Does that count?

Yes. Yes it does.

*Looks at Arcian's avatar*

Well, I didn't have in mind sleeping this night anyway.

[Abraham_uk]

SolidBeast wrote...

Arcian wrote...

SolidBeast wrote...

Arcian wrote...

Please just shut the f**k up. You obviously have no...
That's your ENTIRE PROBLEM, you ****
.... you have the gall to come here and whine like a b!tch...
...Grow the f**k up.

Wow, really? I thought you were a mature poster. Must have mixed you up with someone else.

Being nice is only productive to a point. Terror_K has crossed that point and is now lightyears beyond it.

Whereas being an a**hole is never productive and only serves to ruin your credibility. Whatever point the other poster crossed, they still have enough tact not to throw around petty insults.

Why is there so much swearing and rage on the forums? Why? Let's go back to being productive before thread get's banned.

I do like the opening of Mass Effect 3. Some exciting news being given. New powers, new missions, new characters, new everything. I am so excited.

[AdmiralCheez]

Saphra Deden wrote...

Umm, no. He either makes spam posts or he does what he's doing now with Terror_K.

He can be really funny and really thoughtful when he wants to be.  He usually is.  You probably just don't like him because he disagrees with you (which is usually how things go with you, unfortunately).  And seriously, there are times when I myself have wanted to b*tch Terror out.  Terror's smart, but has a tendency to... overreact.

We're all incredibly flawed human beings here, and we all get on each other's nerves.  Doesn't mean we have to start cussing each other out and calling names and stuff.

Even though I do it all the time.  Gleefully and with great vigor.

Maybe I should give up on this whole peace and cooperation thing and let chaos and anarchy finally win here, eh?

[incinerator950]

Saphra Deden wrote...

Luc0s wrote...

Wait... so Terror_K is basically saying that gameplay isn't the core of a video-game? lol...

I think it is core to games in general but it needn't necessarily be core to a series.

Mass Effect was marketed and designed as a specific kind of Sci-Fi.

The combat gameplay has improved in each game but everything else has changed.

ME2 felt a little bit less like Ridley Scott/TNG/Heinlen science fiction and more like comic-book science fiction.

ME3 so far looks more like a Hollywood Summer Blockbuster.

You can understand how this might annoy someone who was a fan of the first type, I'm sure.

Yes, we went from a Movie, to a Soap Opera, to a musical composition with Mozart and a cannon. 

[AdmiralCheez]

incinerator950 wrote...

Yes, we went from a Movie, to a Soap Opera, to a musical composition with Mozart and a cannon.

classical composers and heavy artillery?

Me gusta.

[Terror_K]

Luc0s wrote...

Wait... so Terror_K is basically saying that gameplay isn't the core of a video-game? lol...

No. I'm saying that gameplay that didn't exist in the previous two titles and suddenly does now that is for the most part purely optional isn't  part of the core gameplay of the game. For example, part of the gameplay in ME2 is shooting pyjaks on Tuchanka in a minigame, but it doesn't make it part of the core gameplay. Not every aspect of gameplay is essential. Now granted, Kinect support, special melee moves and multiplayer are more integral to the gameplay for ME3 than that was for ME2, but the point still stands that they aren't part of the overall core Mass Effect gameplay across the trilogy, else they would have been in the other two.

[Aimi]

Abraham_uk wrote...

Why is there so much swearing and rage on the forums? Why? Let's go back to being productive before thread get's banned.

You're complaining about swearing and rage? From the UK? Home of this?

Har.