756 réponses à ce sujet

[SykoWolf]

First of all, if you think the game got WORSE.......SCREW YOU!!!......the game has only got better, and yes I know ME2 felt more like shooter but ME3 promises to be one of 2012 best games (not including Halo 4) it even has promise of being one of the best rpg franchises of all time!!! So if your not buying Mass Effect 3...you can git out... BSN is for people who like Mass Effect, not rip on it!

[KotorEffect3]

Saphra Deden wrote...

KotorEffect3 wrote...

(btw despite what you and your cerberus cult believes ME 2 was a critical and commerical success and ME 3 will probably be the same)

I agree, but you know what? The critics and the masses loving ME2 and ME3 doesn't prove anything. It doesn't mean that it is good.

Though I don't think ME2 is horrible anyway. It has flaws, but they don't really break the game for me. I played it almost as much as I did ME1.

Oh, and I wouldn't post spoilers because I'm mad at Bioware; it'd be because I don't like you.

Which is about as douchey as you can get.  I don't like you either but deliberatly trying to spoil the game is low but with you and the rest of the cerberus cult it is not unexpected.

[KotorEffect3]

Saphra Deden wrote...

SykoWolf wrote...

BSN is for people who like Mass Effect, not rip on it!

I don't recall reading that anywhere in the EULA or whatever.

At this point haters like you Saphra are here to troll.  You people have b!tched and made yourselves heard you are just sticking around to get under the skin of people that are actual fans.

[KotorEffect3]

Saphra Deden wrote...

KotorEffect3 wrote...

Which is about as douchey as you can get.  I don't like you either but deliberatly trying to spoil the game is low but with you and the rest of the cerberus cult it is not unexpected.

Well you know how Cerberus does things.

We can't let morals or "decency" get in the way of our goals.

And you obviously seem to take it out of game with you.

[Someone With Mass]

Saphra Deden wrote...

Nobody has ever complained about that happening, SWM.

What they've complained about is the lack of impact their choices have. Specifically, importing a Renegade into ME2 is in many ways identical to not importing at all. Your decisions don't carry over well if you play Renegade because in many cases you just get a blank space where a cameo would be.

Paragon doesn't get much really, just flavoring, but I'd still have flavor instead of nothing.

Others will go further and say that every Paragon decision turning out for the best is a bit imbalanced and hurts the believability of the setting. I think that's a fair claim, but only over all. There are no specific choices where I think PARAGON MUST FAIL. 

So far, that is up to ME2, no Paragon or Renegade choices have had any serious positive or negative effects. I'd like to see that change. I'd like both Paragon and Renegade to have mixed outcomes, good outcomes, and bad outcomes.

I'd like my Renegade decisions to carry over to future games and pay-off (for the player) with exclusive content in the form of exclusive characters and such like the Paragon got in ME2.

I must say that if you see a dialogue that affects you or anyone in a negative way (like killing them) and you still choose it and expect something positive to turn up from it in a pretty surreal fashion, it's your own fault, not the game's.

If I see a choice that I don't like, I won't use it just because it's Paragon or Renegade.

[SykoWolf]

Saphra Deden wrote...

SykoWolf wrote...

BSN is for people who like Mass Effect, not rip on it!

I don't recall reading that anywhere in the EULA or whatever.

No sh#t, it also doesn't say you can rip on mass effect and ****** everyone off! Its common courteousy, unspoken rule

[TexasToast712]

 

[Someone With Mass]

Saphra Deden wrote...

Somebody being dead can have as big an effect as them being alive.

I really doubt that.

Especially when you're pretty much sabotaging their work in the process.

[KotorEffect3]

Saphra Deden wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

I really doubt that.

Especially when you're pretty much sabotaging their work in the process.

I guess that explains why the Council being dead, the most important people the galaxy, has no real effect on anything.

Though it also means that there was no justification to save them in the first place.

um spectre reinstatement.

[Exia001]

This topic harks back to what I'm always saying:

I does not matter if youlike something or not or if you dont like anything, you wont buy the game and thats cool, if you do, well you get what you are given because you are not a game developer. Where you see bad things other people see good and at the end of the day, the only person that matters is you playing the game, btw did you consider the council maybe a Chekhovs Gun?

[Someone With Mass]

Saphra Deden wrote...
I guess that explains why the Council being dead, the most important people the galaxy, has no real effect on anything.

Though it also means that there was no justification to save them in the first place.

It's almost as if they have a successor system so the members can be replaced in case of unfortunate events to make sure that everything is still in motion or something.

Sounds so familiar too.

[KotorEffect3]

Saphra Deden wrote...

KotorEffect3 wrote...


um spectre reinstatement.

Oh, so it does have an effect. At least in theory.

I think it'd be neat if Shepard executing somebody in one game wound up with him being confronted with a grieving relative in the next.

Or if killing Helena Blake say resulted in decrease in crime and you'd get a nod from some C-Sec official or something for it (instead of meeting Helena Blake).

If I killed Shiala then instead of meeting a nameless colonist I could have met Elizabeth Baynham.

Ok while I hate to say I agree with you on anything because well I don't like you but I do agree with you on those examples.

[Mr. Gogeta34]

At this point, it seems like a foregone conclusion that Paragon favoritism is a fact with this game series.

So I'll just enjoy the game with that in mind... sucks for "immersive/tough choices"... but perhaps not every choice will be tied to the baised morality system.

[CroGamer002]

Mesina2 wrote...

Paragon = diplomatic hero that wants to save all with less sacrifices possible
Renegade = aggressive anti-hero that doesn't mind to leave destructive path behind to save what can be saved


So I prefer to combine those 2 elements.
You know, to play true pragmatic Shepard not one that pretends to be one.

What?
No response for that?

[Chewin]

^Everyone agreed with you. That's why.

[Mr. Gogeta34]

Down side is that (as it turns out), "what can be saved" grants nothing to the Renegade... there is no "greater good" they sacrifice for compared to the alternative (blue) choice.

Not realistic, but it looks to be beyond fixing now.

[Fossa_]

I always play a combination of both, whatever feels right for the situation.

[Arbitorius]

Saphra Deden wrote...

KotorEffect3 wrote...

Which is about as douchey as you can get.  I don't like you either but deliberatly trying to spoil the game is low but with you and the rest of the cerberus cult it is not unexpected.

Well you know how Cerberus does things.

We can't let morals or "decency" get in the way of our goals.

Wow, an actual Cerberus operative. I had no idea Cerberus was real. CAN THEY MAKE ME A BIOTIC!?

[Mr. Gogeta34]

I also think it's great that no one's mentioning "neutral" choices and non Red/Blue options.^^