Del Ray and BioWare comment on Mass Effect: Deception
#376
Posté 03 février 2012 - 10:58
#377
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:01
bleetman wrote...
And there was much rejoicing.Chris Priestly wrote...
We are currently working on a number of changes that will appear in future editions of the novel.
This was my first thought when I saw this.
#378
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:02
I hope the answers to these questions are all of it and yes.
#379
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:09
Interesting, so what you're saying is the writers will edit out the errors out of Mass Effect Deception and would be re-released agian, only better. Am I correct Chris?Chris Priestly wrote...
Mass Effect fans have been asking for a comment on recent concerns over Mass Effect: Deception. We have been listening and have the below response on the issue.
The teams at Del Rey and BioWare would like to extend our sincerest apologies to the Mass Effect fans for any errors and oversights made in the recent novel Mass Effect: Deception. We are currently working on a number of changes that will appear in future editions of the novel.
We would like to thank all Mass Effect fans for their passion and dedication to this ever-growing world, and assure them that we are listening and taking this matter very seriously.
#380
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:12
More than we fear, less than we hope...legion999 wrote...
So how much is being changed?
#381
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:15
#382
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:16
The main 2 that I can think of (from what I'm told) is Leng being sent off to steal a corpse despite TIM being ok with it before, and caring now because of "credibility". And the other being TIM trying to kill Gillian, instead of capturing her.
Modifié par TMA LIVE, 03 février 2012 - 11:22 .
#383
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:16
#384
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:19
#385
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:20
#386
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:21
TMA LIVE wrote...
Can those who own copies of the book (since none of my book stores ever got a copy), make a list of things about the plot you didn't like?
The main 2 that I can think of (from what I'm told) is Leng being sent off to steal a corpse despite TIM being ok with it before, and caring now because of "credibility". And the other being TIM's reason to kill Gillian, instead of capturing her.
The entire subplot with Aria looking for Liselle's killer has to go. From the funeral on Thessia with the hundreds-strong T'Loak family to discovering it was Kai Leng: gone. It can't be made to work with what we know about her and what happened in Invasion.
#387
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:21
#388
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:23
THEE_DEATHMASTER wrote...
I'm quite concerned as to how this will be handled. Because we'll either get something extremely fruitful, or something half-assed.
Based on the wording, I'd say they will be specifically concentrating on the lore and factual problems.
But it's very possible they aren't even sure to what extent they want to go yet.
#389
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:23
Not sure how they can fix the Gillian Grayson stuff without a complete rewrite of her part, but they should at least be able tidy up some of the more incidental lore issues which will simplify things for the wiki if nothing else.
Modifié par Wulfram, 03 février 2012 - 11:26 .
#390
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:24
didymos1120 wrote...
TMA LIVE wrote...
Can those who own copies of the book (since none of my book stores ever got a copy), make a list of things about the plot you didn't like?
The main 2 that I can think of (from what I'm told) is Leng being sent off to steal a corpse despite TIM being ok with it before, and caring now because of "credibility". And the other being TIM's reason to kill Gillian, instead of capturing her.
The entire subplot with Aria looking for Liselle's killer has to go. From the funeral on Thessia with the hundreds-strong T'Loak family to discovering it was Kai Leng: gone. It can't be made to work with what we know about her and what happened in Invasion.
Yeah, that needs to go. You can't have her know before Invasion at least. That, or give her a real good reason to put getting revenge for her daughter aside. Then again, I don't know how, since she was willing to sacrifice a lot just to get Grayson.
Maybe profit, and get revenge later at a better time?
Modifié par TMA LIVE, 03 février 2012 - 11:29 .
#391
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:25
Pretty much. All we have right now is "ok, we'll see."WizenSlinky0 wrote...
THEE_DEATHMASTER wrote...
I'm quite concerned as to how this will be handled. Because we'll either get something extremely fruitful, or something half-assed.
Based on the wording, I'd say they will be specifically concentrating on the lore and factual problems.
But it's very possible they aren't even sure to what extent they want to go yet.
#392
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:28
Modifié par Drone223, 03 février 2012 - 11:36 .
#393
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:28
Modifié par TMA LIVE, 03 février 2012 - 11:30 .
#394
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:29
#395
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:30
#396
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:30
#397
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:32
#398
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:33
bioware > make some errors in some novel > people complain > they apologise the fans and fix the novel
this is why i like you bioware , ma favourite videogame company of the cita...
#399
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:34
BentOrgy wrote...
petetehcanuck wrote...
Shame on Bioware for allowing this Deception debacle to occur in the first place. Did anyone at Bioware even proof the book as it was being written? Glad I didn't buy it (I have the first two novels).
Maybe they can get Drew Karpyshyn for a rewrite?
That's the scary thing; Casey said he "Reviewed," the piece of garbage, and said that it looked great. Oh, and that "Kai Leng is a badass."
Not very encouraging.
EDIT: "Finished my final review of the #MassEffect Deception novel. A really
fun lead-in to #ME3! Kai Leng is a badass. January 31 release." - Casey Hudson.
And I once again fully support having Mass Effect's "Real," writer back.
PR bull**** most probably.
#400
Posté 03 février 2012 - 11:34
LPPrince wrote...
Like I said, the entire damned thing has to change. At its CORE it doesn't make any sense.
The reason why I want this more brought up is because, if they are going to make changes, they might be reading this thread to know what needs to be altered, besides lore errors.
Not saying they'll make a better book. But if we can highlight the main issues with the plot, beside "being bad", then who knows.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





