NOD-INFORMER37 wrote...
@Phaedon I know there are serious errors in the book, but some ppl just attack every last detail of it, almost as if they do it just for the sake of bashing Dietz hard work, even if it is flawed. Like the "asari air kisses", (where Gillian and another asari cause the air around them to crackle with biotic energy) or that derogatory term used on quarians, why is stuff like that a huge deal? Lots of books based on franchises add little things like that, cant a guy use his imagination? That doesnt excuse the major errors no, but still.
Well, yeah. Of course people are attacking basically every detail. This book, as it stands, really has no redeemable qualities. Lore errors aside, it's simply not that good (and that's me being generous).
The stuff you mentioned obviously isn't a big deal. That's why the deception topic was focused on the major issues and not the minor nitpicks. Generally, however, if you're working on a book with an established canon, it's best not to deviate from that canon. I really don't care about Quarians being called "gas-suckers" or "asari-style air kisses", but they were unnecessary additions. When you're already getting so much wrong, it's hard to accept the author throwing something new in.
Point is, somebody dropped the ball here. And that ball proceeded to roll off a cliff. I'm glad Bioware is making
some effort to remedy the situation, but that doesn't help those who already bought the book, a book that should've been done correctly the first time. Also, as I said before, it would take almost a complete rewrite and reworking of the plot to put Deception on par with the Karpyshyn novels.
Modifié par NPH11, 04 février 2012 - 10:52 .