mulder1199 wrote...
TMA LIVE wrote...
Just got the book yesterday. Already half way through. Will be giving a full opinion when I'm finished.
So far, a lot of head shacking.
i don't wanna ruin it for you, but it ain't gonna get much better
AVPen wrote...
Well that didn't take too long, did it?
Is that what he really looks like? When did this shot come out?AVPen wrote...
Well that didn't take too long, did it?
LPPrince wrote...
His appearance in ME3 gives credence to him being the Ascension-Retribution Kai Leng and not the lame ass Deception version.
TMA LIVE wrote...
LPPrince wrote...
His appearance in ME3 gives credence to him being the Ascension-Retribution Kai Leng and not the lame ass Deception version.
Leng was not in Ascension. At least as far as I'm aware.
ODST 3 wrote...
Is that what he really looks like? When did this shot come out?AVPen wrote...
Well that didn't take too long, did it?
Modifié par Relix28, 09 février 2012 - 09:40 .
Yes, I've recently found them.JeffZero wrote...
ODST 3 wrote...
Is that what he really looks like? When did this shot come out?AVPen wrote...
Well that didn't take too long, did it?
Today. The new videos. The "Ruthless" video. A few seconds in. Enjoy.
Wow. How can this not be the best game of the year?
TMA LIVE wrote...
So far, besides the errors, the worst part about this book is that there is no character development. It's just characters going from A to B, with lots of exposition in between. They follow a lead, which leads them to another lead. Nothing more. While Leng does assignments for the Illusive Man in between.
JeffZero wrote...
TMA LIVE wrote...
So far, besides the errors, the worst part about this book is that there is no character development. It's just characters going from A to B, with lots of exposition in between. They follow a lead, which leads them to another lead. Nothing more. While Leng does assignments for the Illusive Man in between.
Don't forget all the eating. I've seriously considered the notion that Dietz went crazy with the whole "inject symbolism" concept and picked something at random. He catalogs the eating habits of various characters like there's no tomorrow.
Yuoaman wrote...
JeffZero wrote...
TMA LIVE wrote...
So far, besides the errors, the worst part about this book is that there is no character development. It's just characters going from A to B, with lots of exposition in between. They follow a lead, which leads them to another lead. Nothing more. While Leng does assignments for the Illusive Man in between.
Don't forget all the eating. I've seriously considered the notion that Dietz went crazy with the whole "inject symbolism" concept and picked something at random. He catalogs the eating habits of various characters like there's no tomorrow.
It's what all of the thought provoking science fiction is doing.
Maybe.
JeffZero wrote...
Yuoaman wrote...
JeffZero wrote...
TMA LIVE wrote...
So far, besides the errors, the worst part about this book is that there is no character development. It's just characters going from A to B, with lots of exposition in between. They follow a lead, which leads them to another lead. Nothing more. While Leng does assignments for the Illusive Man in between.
Don't forget all the eating. I've seriously considered the notion that Dietz went crazy with the whole "inject symbolism" concept and picked something at random. He catalogs the eating habits of various characters like there's no tomorrow.
It's what all of the thought provoking science fiction is doing.
Maybe.
Is that a hint of doubt I sense from you, ungrateful reader of my masterpiece?
/unfriends
JeffZero wrote...
TMA LIVE wrote...
So far, besides the errors, the worst part about this book is that there is no character development. It's just characters going from A to B, with lots of exposition in between. They follow a lead, which leads them to another lead. Nothing more. While Leng does assignments for the Illusive Man in between.
Don't forget all the eating. I've seriously considered the notion that Dietz went crazy with the whole "inject symbolism" concept and picked something at random. He catalogs the eating habits of various characters like there's no tomorrow.
Modifié par TMA LIVE, 09 février 2012 - 10:03 .
TMA LIVE wrote...
JeffZero wrote...
TMA LIVE wrote...
So far, besides the errors, the worst part about this book is that there is no character development. It's just characters going from A to B, with lots of exposition in between. They follow a lead, which leads them to another lead. Nothing more. While Leng does assignments for the Illusive Man in between.
Don't forget all the eating. I've seriously considered the notion that Dietz went crazy with the whole "inject symbolism" concept and picked something at random. He catalogs the eating habits of various characters like there's no tomorrow.
Yeah, I know. He keeps telling me how they stopped to get something to eat along the way. He also keeps using "Twosome" or "threesome" repeatedly, instead of "The group" or "The two" or "The trio"or simply "They". Or calling a place like Omega "habitat".
Yuoaman wrote...
SORRY, BUT THE CHARACTERS IN STAR TREAT ARE REALLY FLAT. THE PHILOSOPHICAL MUSINGS RING HOLLOW.
But none of the others dared embrace her, or to offer words of solace, because Aria T’Loak was the Pirate Queen. And to touch her was to die.
izmirtheastarach wrote...
That most recent parody comic pointed out a great line in the book.But none of the others dared embrace her, or to offer words of solace, because Aria T’Loak was the Pirate Queen. And to touch her was to die.
To touch her was to die? Oh, man. THIS LADY IS SERIOUS.
JeffZero wrote...
It was a dark, stormy night on Thessia. And by dark and stormy I mean cyanide was raining down from the skies above. And so everyone died.
Now that's some film noir for you.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
