352 réponses à ce sujet

[ParagonForLife]

MissMaster wrote...

Garrus dies and there is nothing you can do about it. :<

Garrus is worth about 15 billion human lifes to me so if the choice is Save earth or Save Garrus.......well....goodbye earth

[KotorEffect3]

Volus Warlord wrote...

KotorEffect3 wrote...

Volus Warlord wrote...

Killing Vido should be priority over the refinery workers. Vido would kill a hell of lot more if let escape than a handful of refinery workers.

No because the next guy in line would just take over the Blue Suns and still be doing the same thing.

But it would set them back. It would weaken the Blue Suns. The loss of a leader is not something you blow off. The Blue Suns could dissolve into several smaller, weaker bands. They could have infighting for leadership. And much more. You could potentially cripple or destroy a major enemy... or do nothing with any lasting effects. 

I think the choice is pretty obvious.

The Blue Suns were more like a corporation than a cult.  While it is true they might have had some infighting etc....  Overall Vido was just at the top position, he wasn't a figurehead or anything.

[MisterJB]

ParagonForLife wrote...

MissMaster wrote...

Garrus dies and there is nothing you can do about it. :<

Garrus is worth about 15 billion human lifes to me so if the choice is Save earth or Save Garrus.......well....goodbye earth

Your actions contradict your username.

[KotorEffect3]

Besides Zaeed is funnier when gets pissed and is trying to shoot at Zaeed's gunship.

[KotorEffect3]

MisterJB wrote...

ParagonForLife wrote...

MissMaster wrote...

Garrus dies and there is nothing you can do about it. :<

Garrus is worth about 15 billion human lifes to me so if the choice is Save earth or Save Garrus.......well....goodbye earth

Your actions contradict your username.

And your avatar works for the reapers.  Then again so does mine.

[KotorEffect3]

Saphra Deden wrote...

MisterJB wrote...

ParagonForLife wrote...

MissMaster wrote...

Garrus dies and there is nothing you can do about it. :<

Garrus is worth about 15 billion human lifes to me so if the choice is Save earth or Save Garrus.......well....goodbye earth

Your actions contradict your username.

Not really. Paragon is all about undermining humanity and sacrificing others on the altar of Shepard's personal morals.

And what does renegade do?

[ParagonForLife]

MisterJB wrote...

ParagonForLife wrote...

MissMaster wrote...

Garrus dies and there is nothing you can do about it. :<

Garrus is worth about 15 billion human lifes to me so if the choice is Save earth or Save Garrus.......well....goodbye earth

Your actions contradict your username.

 Garrus is the most important thing in the universe to me if I lose him then I just wont even care to fight the reapers

[KotorEffect3]

Saphra Deden wrote...

KotorEffect3 wrote...

And what does renegade do?

Defends humanity and keeps others safe no matter the cost to his reputation, beliefs, or his ability to sleep soundly at night.

Who are the others he keeps safe?

[ParagonForLife]

Cthulhu42 wrote...

MisterJB wrote...

ParagonForLife wrote...

MissMaster wrote...

Garrus dies and there is nothing you can do about it. :<

Garrus is worth about 15 billion human lifes to me so if the choice is Save earth or Save Garrus.......well....goodbye earth

Your actions contradict your username.

I've commented on that with one of his earlier posts.

Its not my choice to sacrifice anyone a Paragon wont force that he will let them make that choice or not  forcing someone else to make a sacrifice isnt a true paragon If Garrus choose to die to save others I whould accept that iam not gonna throw garrus out the airlock to save anyone

[Siegdrifa]

GodWood wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...
I can go either way on Zaeed and his LM.

I saw an interesting take on his LM a while ago.

I would not destroy the factory of one of humanity's most important corporations and industries, when I am aiming for human hegemony politically and economically, to kill one man. I do not care about the workers.

[It's] a resource rich planet, that can cost Eldfell-Ashland Energy millions of credits if completely destroyed. Not to mention that it would look worse for humanity if they completely failed to protect their investments and workers abroad.

This is the same for lot of choice, you could actualy either justufy it by a paragond or renegade point of view.

While playing the games, i find some choices to be in the wrong side, but beyond that, what really matter is that i have the option to make this choice, some people are so focused on the color they forget they can make other choices that would may be fit better for their game experience.

What matter is that your choice carry the consequence you are expecting from it.

The worst possible story outcome for me, would be consequence >< choices, i don't care if they are paragon or renegade, because i play both.
When i choose to pull the triger by choice, i want him dead !
When i choose to give him a hand, i want to help him !
Wanting to punish either side because you don't agree that he should be "killed" or "rescued" is childish IMO, It's more about what you "CAN" do, rather then what you "MUST" do.
This is an entertainement.

[Lightweight Nate]

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

pmac_tk421 wrote...

TexasToast712 wrote...

Haasth wrote...

Worst possible outcome?

No one dies. At all. No casualties, everyone lives and makes it out happily ever after.
Mass Effect 2 style.

I hate people like you. ****ing death obsessed emo.

Yeah I'm tired of people talking about how a no death ending in 2 is the worst ending and several races need to go extinct regardless of what you do in ME3. Read Admiral Cheez's"let me save them" thread.

The one in which no good points where made, as is custom by Cheez and her mindless followers?

In the end, it all came down to "I couldn't stand losing my virtual space waifu/husbando, please don't have them die.".

Well it's better that way than having you favorite squadmate die off in a way that you couldn't possibly prevent just because someone else wanted it to happen. The Virmire decision was exactly that: a decision. You got to choose who you wanted to save. Killing off a character at random is just dumb writing. Call of Duty has resorted to killing off protagonists in pretty much every game since aught six. "OMG this is so dramatic lulz!!!" How 'bout we have to make hard decisions, but ones that we have an actual choice in? The suicide mission wasn't even exactly that suicidal. You were given, "the brightest, the toughest, the deadliest allies [Cerberus could] find". That combined with the most advanced and innovative technology available makes your prospects quite a bit brighter.

[Dave of Canada]

Everybody surviving would be one of the worst story outcomes, thankfully that isn't so and that's probably one of the only redeeming factors of the script.

Modifié par Dave of Canada, 05 février 2012 - 04:03 .

[Siegdrifa]

Saphra Deden wrote...

Lightweight Nate wrote...

Well it's better that way than having you favorite squadmate die off in a way that you couldn't possibly prevent just because someone else wanted it to happen.

You won't mind as long as it is done well and will actually enjoy it.

Like Littlefoot's mother dying, or Bambi's, or Mufasa, or Ben Kenobi, ect...

Don't talk for other, you are not him.

[Hunter of Legends]

Saphra Deden wrote...

KotorEffect3 wrote...

Who are the others he keeps safe?

Humanity and the galaxy.

Wouldn't a human centralist *not* protect the galaxy?

[Hunter of Legends]

Saphra Deden wrote...

Hunter of Legends wrote...

Wouldn't a human centralist *not* protect the galaxy?

No, a human centrist just puts humanity first.

Yes, but you would come at odds with many in the galaxy because as you already have stated "other sides will put their species first".

Essentially, you *can't* protect the galaxy and put human goals first; perhaps not even for ME 3.