405 réponses à ce sujet

[TheKillerAngel]

JeffZero wrote...

TheKillerAngel wrote...

cgrimm54 wrote...

 BEHOLD THE NON-SEXY ME1 ARMOR
http://cloud.steampo...141EC1A0CAA177/

I'm going to go away now.

The ascrack is not only visible but accentuated by the color. It's really not much different to me.

(That was their point.)

I sensed as much.

[MissMaster]

sex sales. deal with it.

[Shifty-looking Chicken]

Saphra Deden wrote...

Shifty-looking Chicken wrote...

I thought you were also going to kill Tali for how she treats Xen in ME3.

No. I don't think that would even happen in my ME3 because I'd never make peace between the geth and quarians.

I don't have a problem with Mordin as a character, but if his voice actor isn't coming back then I don't want Mordin back.

It's a matter of principal.

The only reason I was planning on getting rid of Tali/Garrus was to prevent the romance.

I don't want to romance Tali anymore but if I don't then she gets with Garrus and that is cringe worthy.
Thing is, I have to find a way to roleplay it. Killing off Tali is
hard because there's no reason my Shepard wouldn't shout at the trial
and get her off scott-free.


I'm between a rock and a hard place.

I've heard that it may be possible to just not recruit Tali or Garrus in ME3, even if they are alive. You could try that.

[JeffZero]

TheKillerAngel wrote...
I sensed as much.

Oh, my bad.

[bleetman]

Sure, it's visually not all that different. I do, however, have a hard time looking at ME1 armour and thinking "yep, that was designed to be sexy". Maybe I'm wrong? It wouldn't be the first time. Could be I just lack imagination. Not that I really buy into the whole 'this has been going on a while now' thing as reasoning why something isn't allowed to cause annoyance.

What's getting people - or me, at least - riled up over ME3 outfits isn't so much that they're sexy. It's the 'character X needed to be sexy, so we sexed them up' isn't even community speculation. It's literally described as being the justification for character design. So when stuff like this comes out, yeah, people're going to get annoyed by it.

Modifié par bleetman, 05 février 2012 - 12:08 .

[Annihilator27]

Qui-Gon-Jinn wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

Shifty-looking Chicken wrote...

I thought you were also going to kill Tali for how she treats Xen in ME3.

No. I don't think that would even happen in my ME3 because I'd never make peace between the geth and quarians.

I don't have a problem with Mordin as a character, but if his voice actor isn't coming back then I don't want Mordin back.

It's a matter of principal.

The only reason I was planning on getting rid of Tali/Garrus was to prevent the romance.

I don't want to romance Tali anymore but if I don't then she gets with Garrus and that is cringe worthy.
Thing is, I have to find a way to roleplay it. Killing off Tali is
hard because there's no reason my Shepard wouldn't shout at the trial
and get her off scott-free.


I'm between a rock and a hard place.

Kill Garrus

This, Dont role play and just kill Garrus or Tali.Just do It.

[GodWood]

Luc0s wrote...
Two words:


SEX SELLS


/thread

Unfortunately Bioware forgot how to do it.

Full nudity in sex scenes, armoured in combat. NOT dry humping in sex scenes, catsuits in combat.

[What a Succulent Ass]

Saphra Deden wrote...


The only reason I was planning on getting rid of Tali/Garrus was to prevent the romance.

Thinking about killing off Garrus for exactly this reason. Might import a save where Kaidan is alive for similar reasons. And if I could short-circuit EDI, I'd be tempted to do that too.

Modifié par Random Jerkface, 05 février 2012 - 12:15 .

[DJBare]

Obvakhi wrote...

No, it's just another over-sexualized women complaint thread. Nothing new here.

It's more than that, it changes Ashley's nature, shes not a prude but she is obviously the type of woman considers sex has it's place and a uniform is not the place.

What's even more worrying is that they will make her and Kaidan SS relationships for Shepard.

[ReallyRue]

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

Genshie wrote...
If you are in a relationship with her you can tell her no in the meeting with Zevran and in response she expects some alone time with you later. However, I love the responses in that scene by your companion characters and just how ridiculous it is so I always go for threesome.

You have to go out of your way to, though. She really doesn't care about you, she isn't "falling" for you at all if she decides to have sex with another person while in a relationship with Hawke, without knowing or asking Hawke's opinion on the whole issue.

Maybe it didn't occur to her that it wasn't an open relationship.

[JeffZero]

bleetman wrote...

Sure, it's visually not all that different. I do, however, have a hard time looking at armour like that and thinking "yep, that was designed to be sexy". Maybe I'm wrong? It wouldn't be the first time.

What's getting people riled up over ME3 outfits isn't so much that they're sexy. It's the 'character X needed to be sexy, so we sexed them up' isn't even community speculation. It's literally described as being the justification for character design. So when stuff like this comes out, yeah, people're going to get annoyed by it.

A lot of people seem to be in general agreement with you regarding not seeing the 'designed to be sexy' with Ash's initial armor, so I'd say it isn't just you, at least. I just... I've never felt that way. It's always looked pretty ridiculous to me. /shrug

As for the rest of your post, yeah, that's what made me do a bit of a double-take. The art book is just... facepalm. So is that GameInformer interview with one of the designers from last year that gets mentioned from time to time, when he explained that the relative lack of female aliens was due to not knowing what to do to make them attractive.

[JeffZero]

Saphra Deden wrote...
You had to go out of your way in ME1 to stare at butts.

Granted.

[incinerator950]

bleetman wrote...

Sure, it's visually not all that different. I do, however, have a hard time looking at ME1 armour and thinking "yep, that was designed to be sexy". Maybe I'm wrong? It wouldn't be the first time. Could be I just lack imagination. Not that I really buy into the whole 'this has been going on a while now' thing as reasoning why something isn't allowed to cause annoyance.

What's getting people - or me, at least - riled up over ME3 outfits isn't so much that they're sexy. It's the 'character X needed to be sexy, so we sexed them up' isn't even community speculation. It's literally described as being the justification for character design. So when stuff like this comes out, yeah, people're going to get annoyed by it.

Bioware's IP, not theirs.  They don't like it, then can shove off.  I hear Star Wars or the pre FO3 Fallout Community is looking for more useless fans.

Modifié par incinerator950, 05 février 2012 - 12:12 .

[Shifty-looking Chicken]

DJBare wrote...

Obvakhi wrote...

No, it's just another over-sexualized women complaint thread. Nothing new here.

It's more than that, it changes Ashley's nature, shes not a prude but she is obviously the type of woman considers sex has it's place and a uniform is not the place.

What's even more worrying is that they will make her and Kaidan SS relationships for Shepard.

And now s/s romance has been brought into the thread. Things are about to get unpleasant, I think.

[MissMaster]

And if Ash had a mustache and was ugly people would still be pissed.

Modifié par MissMaster, 05 février 2012 - 12:11 .

[Xarathox]

Bioware y u no hire/appeal to amish prudes? :C

[Ghost Lightning]

Xarathox wrote...

Bioware y u no hire/appeal to amish prudes? :C

dis tbh

[Chuck Fandango]

Run for the hills, the feminists have taken over BSN!!!

Can''t Ashley still be a smart, strong woman & have a fantastic arse? I'll tell you now that most women I know would show it off if they had her arse & that includes my wife who is a strong, smart woman (teacher). Besides don't most female gamers kill Ashley on Virmire? Seems almost a non issue, out of sight, out of mind I always say!

As a guy, all I can say is "Ashley, I hate to see you go, but love to see you leave".

Modifié par Chuck Fandango, 05 février 2012 - 12:15 .

[incinerator950]

JeffZero wrote...

bleetman wrote...

Sure, it's visually not all that different. I do, however, have a hard time looking at armour like that and thinking "yep, that was designed to be sexy". Maybe I'm wrong? It wouldn't be the first time.

What's getting people riled up over ME3 outfits isn't so much that they're sexy. It's the 'character X needed to be sexy, so we sexed them up' isn't even community speculation. It's literally described as being the justification for character design. So when stuff like this comes out, yeah, people're going to get annoyed by it.

A lot of people seem to be in general agreement with you regarding not seeing the 'designed to be sexy' with Ash's initial armor, so I'd say it isn't just you, at least. I just... I've never felt that way. It's always looked pretty ridiculous to me. /shrug

As for the rest of your post, yeah, that's what made me do a bit of a double-take. The art book is just... facepalm. So is that GameInformer interview with one of the designers from last year that gets mentioned from time to time, when he explained that the relative lack of female aliens was due to not knowing what to do to make them attractive.

The problem is because so many fans want them to be attractive.  I've heard so many people say "Can we have sex with _____ in ME 3" that were not actually joking.