235 réponses à ce sujet

[RocketManSR2]

The Executioner wrote...

 My opinion will be heard deal with that.

Nobody cares so deal with that.

[AtreiyaN7]

Jorina Leto wrote...

EA wants mulitplayer. EA gets multiplayer.

For you there are two options.
First option: Do not buy the game and EA may get the message. But EA's plan to lure in even more Call of Duty fanboys by adding multiplayer may succeed.
Second option: Buy the game. EA won't get your intended message and their plan to lure in even more Call of Duty fanboys by adding multiplayer may succeed.

But arguing with the Bioware fanbois here is a waste of time.

A bigger waste of time involves reading a post where "fanboy" gets used in almost every sentence.

[Gh0st_00]

I can't wait until after release day, every problem people have with the game will be blamed on multiplayer.

"What do you mean my favourite character isn't a squadmate? It must be because of multiplayer!"
"I found a bug in the game? It's because they spent too much time on multiplayer!"
"It took me less time to finish than the previous games? Multiplayer!!"

Modifié par Gh0st_00, 05 février 2012 - 11:28 .

[didymos1120]

Jorina Leto wrote...

G3rman wrote...

Says the person with a 2 year account on BSN.

Ah an ad hominem.

One of the reasons why not to argue with fanbois.

[Jorina Leto]

AtreiyaN7 wrote...

Jorina Leto wrote...

EA wants mulitplayer. EA gets multiplayer.

For you there are two options.
First option: Do not buy the game and EA may get the message. But EA's plan to lure in even more Call of Duty fanboys by adding multiplayer may succeed.
Second option: Buy the game. EA won't get your intended message and their plan to lure in even more Call of Duty fanboys by adding multiplayer may succeed.

But arguing with the Bioware fanbois here is a waste of time.

A bigger waste of time involves reading a post where "fanboy" gets used in almost every sentence.

Reading a post that uses the correct term is a waste of time. Sure...

Modifié par Jorina Leto, 05 février 2012 - 11:35 .

[G3rman]

Jorina Leto wrote...
Reading a post that uses the correct term is a waste of time. Sure...

Reading your responses makes it clear you are nothing but a troll that doesn't actually have a claim and is butt hurt BioWare doesn't love you no more.

Deal with it.

[mkk316]

I dont get all the fuss, you don't have to play it. It comes free with the game, its made by another team so resources weren't diverted, so what's the big freakin deal? I don't even think the OP knows how its being implemented in the game, he's just hating.

[Dewart]

Izhalezan wrote...

Dewart wrote...

DJBare wrote...

The Executioner wrote...
  What's next Multiplayer DA3 just want to let them know this is not a part of the game i even remotely care about,and there efforts are best spent on the game itself.

Wait a damn minute, are you saying there is going to be a DA3 after that fiasco called DA2, well, I just don't know what to say

Oh come on DA2 wasn't that bad everyone just expected way too much from it and couldn't handle new ideas. At least the game played it's not like it was Two Worlds or something like that.

It's the only game I own that puts me to sleep.

Which one DA2 or Two Worlds?

[Sora Shepherd]

People are so quick to say that "X" is a waste of time yet they are incapable of stating the absolutely required "Y" addition that resources would have better use in.

Astounding, really....<_<

[AtreiyaN7]

Jorina Leto wrote...

AtreiyaN7 wrote...

Jorina Leto wrote...

EA wants mulitplayer. EA gets multiplayer.

For you there are two options.
First option: Do not buy the game and EA may get the message. But EA's plan to lure in even more Call of Duty fanboys by adding multiplayer may succeed.
Second option: Buy the game. EA won't get your intended message and their plan to lure in even more Call of Duty fanboys by adding multiplayer may succeed.

But arguing with the Bioware fanbois here is a waste of time.

A bigger waste of time involves reading a post where "fanboy" gets used in almost every sentence.

Reading a post that uses the correct term is a waste of time. Sure...

It's not a correct term - it's a term loaded with negative connotations that you're using for the express purpose of demeaning an entire group and marginalizing them, not to mention that this is an attempt by you to negatively paint multiplayer in general.

Modifié par AtreiyaN7, 06 février 2012 - 12:01 .

[LGTX]

I know the OP contains text, but all I see is a can of worms. And it's open.

Look at their numbers, good god!

[Dewart]

Jorina Leto wrote...

EA wants mulitplayer. EA gets multiplayer.

For you there are two options.
First option: Do not buy the game and EA may get the message. But EA's plan to lure in even more Call of Duty fanboys by adding multiplayer may succeed.
Second option: Buy the game. EA won't get your intended message and their plan to lure in even more Call of Duty fanboys by adding multiplayer may succeed.

But arguing with the Bioware fanbois here is a waste of time.

Oh look a fanboy statement which is also bashing fanboys. Things are getting confusing in here.

[N7 Roadie]

I doubt the MP will have a significant effect on the rest of the game. Don't fret about it. If we all enjoyed ME1 and ME2 (I sure as hell did) than I'm sure we won't be cut short on ME3, whether or not we play multiplayer.

[Dewart]

LGTX wrote...

I know the OP contains text, but all I see is a can of worms. And it's open.

Look at their numbers, good god!

This made me smile and for that I say "thank you good sir or madam"

[Iakus]

mkk316 wrote...

I dont get all the fuss, you don't have to play it. It comes free with the game, its made by another team so resources weren't diverted, so what's the big freakin deal? I don't even think the OP knows how its being implemented in the game, he's just hating.

Because it's all on the same disks.  Can we truly be certain that nothing got left out of the single player game (ie the SP game didn't get shortened) to fit multiplayer into the game?

[mkk316]

iakus wrote...

mkk316 wrote...

I dont get all the fuss, you don't have to play it. It comes free with the game, its made by another team so resources weren't diverted, so what's the big freakin deal? I don't even think the OP knows how its being implemented in the game, he's just hating.

Because it's all on the same disks.  Can we truly be certain that nothing got left out of the single player game (ie the SP game didn't get shortened) to fit multiplayer into the game?

Why do you think MP would need it's own disk?  I don't think there's really anything about it that would require something like that, and do we know for sure that the SP fits on one disk?

[didymos1120]

iakus wrote...

Because it's all on the same disks.  Can we truly be certain that nothing got left out of the single player game (ie the SP game didn't get shortened) to fit multiplayer into the game?

Of course not.  You can't be truly certain of anything.  Welcome to reality...or is it?

[Chuvvy]

AlanC9 wrote...

I'm against wasting resources on MP too, but since they gave MP to another team it doesn't look like that happened.

Making MP cost money, that money could have gone into making ME3. How can people not put this together? EA had a budget for ME3, part of it went to multiplayer instead of singleplayer. It's simple math.

[Someone With Mass]

iakus wrote...

mkk316 wrote...

I dont get all the fuss, you don't have to play it. It comes free with the game, its made by another team so resources weren't diverted, so what's the big freakin deal? I don't even think the OP knows how its being implemented in the game, he's just hating.

Because it's all on the same disks.  Can we truly be certain that nothing got left out of the single player game (ie the SP game didn't get shortened) to fit multiplayer into the game?

What if they had more space to work with this time and already got the story they wanted? Disk space is only good when you can use it, you know.

[didymos1120]

Slidell505 wrote...

AlanC9 wrote...

I'm against wasting resources on MP too, but since they gave MP to another team it doesn't look like that happened.

Making MP cost money, that money could have gone into making ME3. How can people not put this together? EA had a budget for ME3, part of it went to multiplayer instead of singleplayer. It's simple math.

And you know the budget would have been exactly the same without MP in the picture how?

[G3rman]

iakus wrote...

mkk316 wrote...

I dont get all the fuss, you don't have to play it. It comes free with the game, its made by another team so resources weren't diverted, so what's the big freakin deal? I don't even think the OP knows how its being implemented in the game, he's just hating.

Because it's all on the same disks.  Can we truly be certain that nothing got left out of the single player game (ie the SP game didn't get shortened) to fit multiplayer into the game?

They will put all the content they feel is necessary into SP and as much content as necessary in MP.  They wouldn't release the game if they felt they didn't have a complete game.

Get. Over. It.

[Sinnerj117]

This again?

[Dewart]

Slidell505 wrote...

AlanC9 wrote...

I'm against wasting resources on MP too, but since they gave MP to another team it doesn't look like that happened.

Making MP cost money, that money could have gone into making ME3. How can people not put this together? EA had a budget for ME3, part of it went to multiplayer instead of singleplayer. It's simple math.

Or simple speculation on your part considering you have no idea if the budget would have been the same if they were going to make it SP only.

[Iakus]

Someone With Mass wrote...

iakus wrote...

mkk316 wrote...

I dont get all the fuss, you don't have to play it. It comes free with the game, its made by another team so resources weren't diverted, so what's the big freakin deal? I don't even think the OP knows how its being implemented in the game, he's just hating.

Because it's all on the same disks.  Can we truly be certain that nothing got left out of the single player game (ie the SP game didn't get shortened) to fit multiplayer into the game?

What if they had more space to work with this time and already got the story they wanted? Disk space is only good when you can use it, you know.

I've said before that if after putting in everything they wanted into the single player game, they gazed upon their work and went "Huh, we still have nearly 2GB lefttover.  What else can we fit in here?"  Then yeah, fine, include MP as an extra.

But I haven't heard that used as a reassurance for this decidedly controversial decision.  Have you? 

[Carnage752]

Admin I will not blame you if you lock this ****. Haters be hatin.