(in other news, queen Victoria is dead. more news at 11)
edit: and regarding argument about expensive space travels, that doesn't account for the home worlds of individual species.
Modifié par tmp7704, 08 février 2012 - 06:22 .
Modifié par tmp7704, 08 février 2012 - 06:22 .
Random Jerkface wrote...
An observation =/= moaning. There's no point in posting if you've nothing to contribute.Exia001 wrote...
This is what we've taken to moaning at now?
Bleachrude wrote...
For the citadel, the numbers are actually reasonable. Remember, what you're looking for is not "just population" but population density.
Ward length = 43.6 km
Ward Width - 330m
Total ward area = 14.388 square liometres
5 wards thus give an area of 71.94 kilometres squared.
Assuming population is equally dispersed, you end up with a population density of 183, 486 per square kilometre
From Wikipedia, Manila currently has the highest population density in our world at 43, 079 per square kilometre.
The Citadel is literally 4 times as dense as Manila and 9 times as dense as Paris.
essarr71 wrote...
Really, guys? No one is going to make a pre-order cancelled joke here? This topic is ripe for it.
Im disappointed BSN. You guys are slipping.
MostlyAutumn wrote...
Didn't one of the councillors say that Council decisions affect trillions of lives in ME1? And Renegade Shep says something about sacrificing thousands to save trillions at the end of the Arrival.
Modifié par Heraxion, 08 février 2012 - 06:25 .
ReveurIngenu wrote...
I used the planet of Coruscant as an example, but in no means did I say I wanted a planet with such a high popluation. 1 trillion does seem excessive. I think more planets, worlds, or colonies with populations in the billions would have been reasonable instead of mostly millions that we've gotten. .
AlanC9 wrote...
ReveurIngenu wrote...
I used the planet of Coruscant as an example, but in no means did I say I wanted a planet with such a high popluation. 1 trillion does seem excessive. I think more planets, worlds, or colonies with populations in the billions would have been reasonable instead of mostly millions that we've gotten. .
Which planets that we've actually seen should have had higher populations? Ilium's about the only plausible one for a big population, and that world's only marginally habitable.
Modifié par Heraxion, 08 février 2012 - 06:32 .
Gabey5 wrote...
Most people would stay on homeworld
ReveurIngenu wrote...
I guess I just would have like to be marveled, to read about a planet or solar system with such unexpected or unusual characteristics that I couldn't help but try to imagine how such a planet could exist and maybe not be able to. The universe is so big that I just wanted something in the ME2 universe to make me feel like we are small and insignificant and that there are things so much bigger and unexpected and beautiful out there and to just leave me in awe.
Yet, everything in ME has been really small and just not mind-blowing, very Earthlike. I don't know. I guess I'm just disappointed that everything seems to small in the ME universe with no real sense of any grandeur or anything.
But why continue living on a planet that's full to the bursting, with high prices and having to travel every day to some other place?ReveurIngenu wrote...
As for not having any industry, with space travel, I'm sure people could live on the planet but work on another planet nearby. You're thinking in too small a scale. Not everything needs to be available or be done in one place (in this case, on the planet Coruscant). With interstellaire traval, whatever the planet lacks can be found elsewhere. Just like today, people travel to other countries, work in other countries where ressources are easily found.
Exia001 wrote...
This is what we've taken to moaning at now?