Firstly, you have the Purists - these types of players simply pick a corner and mash it for the entire story. As such, it's actually pretty boring to watch their stories, but they tend to be the better players during combat.
Secondly, you have the Concepts - these guys develop a personality for their specific Shepard during character creation (or even before, as they've watched others play). From pragmatists to pacfists, these playthroughs are usually quite interesting to watch play out, storywise.
Lastly, you have the Avatars - these are the guys that simply play their Shepard in a manner that fits with their own personality. They're usually the most fun to watch, as well, during major moral decisions - watching them squirm as they decide the fate of the Rachni Queen or the Geth Heretics.
Personally, I think I fall into the last category. I find it difficult to toss in decisions that I do not agree with, personally. Likewise, my Shepard ended up turning into a Renegade that made a majority of important Paragon decisions. Kind of a jerk in day-to-day dealings, but his morality came into play when his interactions mattered. (On that note, I really wish that "Concentrate on Sovereign!" did not equate to "Kill the Council for Human Supremecy!" I like aliens - I just prioritized halting Sovereign over sacrificing lives [human or not] for a political concern.)
Do you fall into any of the above categories? Did I miss a type of player? My experiences are first-hand only.
Modifié par Berkilak, 08 février 2012 - 08:58 .





Retour en haut






