29 réponses à ce sujet

[PSUHammer]

JimboP2050 wrote...

Hammer6767 wrote...

One man's "elitism & snobbery" is another's wish.  Guess it is all about perspective.  I wish people would stop being so dismissive about pretty basic concerns.  It isn't about "testing" your system, dude.

Do you have a High Def TV?  Do you like watching standard def programming on it or 4:3 pan & scan movies?  I bet not.  Would I call you an elitist if you were to ask the cable company to carry more HD channels?

+1.

It doesn't bug me that ME3 isn't on a higher level graphics wise though, I didn't expect it to be.


Btw Hammer, we have nearly identicle set ups haha.

Yeah...I am pretty happy with it.  I haven't had too many games tax it at 1920x1200.  I also have a monsterous full size tower running everything.  It looks like a mini fridge.  I plan on upgrading the storage and make it my primary HTPC and media server.

[hex23]

chizow wrote...

Nvidia users can use SGSSAA with a custom AA compatibility bit in Nvidia Inspector that makes the image look flawless with virtual no blurring in Mass Effect 1/2.  Not sure if it works with ME3 but I'll try it in a bit.

For Antialiasing Compatibility use: 0x000010C1

Antialiasing Behavior Flags = None
Antialiasing Mode = Override
Antialiasing Setting = 2x or 4x or 8xQ
Transparency Antialiasing = 2x or 4x or 8x Sparse Grid supersampling (max limited to MSAA samples)

Downside is this method is VERY performance expensive as its true FS SSAA but the image quality and reduction of shimmering in motion is amazing.  For slower GPU configs you are better off sticking to FXAA/MLAA/SMAA injectors.

I have yet to find an AA mode in Inspector that works. I've used the one you said (0x000010C1) and the default ME1/ME2 one too. Any idea why that is?

[Apheration]

Chuck Fandango wrote...

Look, the way I see it is all you PC gamers have gone out & bought Ferrari's, knowing that the speed limit is 70mph, but still moan that you can't go top speed!

If a game is developed for PC only, then it can have massive requirements to play & push your systems to the limits, ME3 wasn't. It just sounds like petty recriminations to me, "I've spent a lot of money on my PC & now ME3 is ruined by catering to those poor, dirty console gamers! *spit*"

That's where the elitism & snobbery grind my gears, so what if ME3 won't even test your system, you'll still play it, because it's the final act of a trilogy & you'd be stupid to miss out because your graphics OCD got the better of you.

That's it on this matter for me, goodnight!

As a PC gamer, what is frustrating to me is not graphic quality....It's that gameplay mechanics are dumbed down to grab a wider audience and make it easier to play with a game pad rather than mouse and keyboard.  

[GirlPower23]

MrChowderClam wrote...

Edit: For those of you unfamiliar with FXAA, it's a type of antialiasing that looks at the final, rendered image and then blurs it along the jagged edges to get rid of any aliasing. One of the great thigns about this is that it works on any image or video, regardless of what rendering engine you are using. The downside is that it sometimes doesn't catch all the jaggies, or blurs things (like text) unintentionally. Read more about it here.

The downside to FXAA is that it's no where near the quality of MSAA or SSAA and it looks like ass, especially text suffers the most from it. It's a mediocre solution to the MSAA/Deferred Render Engine problem.

[Marbazoid]

I'm curious about what type of post-process AA ME3 uses.

SMAA or FXAA? Its hard to tell.