Dave of Canada wrote...
So he's scolding his daughter for acting like a child by throwing a temper tantrum?
Ok.
Pretty much this. If you have to act like a child to "parent" your child, then you shouldn't be allowed to make them.
Dave of Canada wrote...
So he's scolding his daughter for acting like a child by throwing a temper tantrum?
Ok.
android654 wrote...
Dave of Canada wrote...
So he's scolding his daughter for acting like a child by throwing a temper tantrum?
Ok.
Pretty much this. If you have to act like a child to "parent" your child, then you shouldn't be allowed to make them.
chunkyman wrote...
android654 wrote...
Dave of Canada wrote...
So he's scolding his daughter for acting like a child by throwing a temper tantrum?
Ok.
Pretty much this. If you have to act like a child to "parent" your child, then you shouldn't be allowed to make them.
Totally. Forced sterilization for the win!
android654 wrote...
chunkyman wrote...
android654 wrote...
Dave of Canada wrote...
So he's scolding his daughter for acting like a child by throwing a temper tantrum?
Ok.
Pretty much this. If you have to act like a child to "parent" your child, then you shouldn't be allowed to make them.
Totally. Forced sterilization for the win!
If you stopped for a moment and considered the problem malcontents create by raising a child improperly and contributing nothing to society, then its logical to think that certain people shouldn't procreate. A father who stomps around like a toddler instead of actually addressing the problem with his child is someone who shouldn't be making any more genetic copies of himself.
Modifié par chunkyman, 13 février 2012 - 05:31 .
MarchWaltz wrote...
This is so not gonna end well.
Guest_Angus Cousland_*
android654 wrote...
If you stopped for a moment and considered the problem malcontents create by raising a child improperly and contributing nothing to society, then its logical to think that certain people shouldn't procreate. A father who stomps around like a toddler instead of actually addressing the problem with his child is someone who shouldn't be making any more genetic copies of himself.
Angus Cousland wrote...
I think anyone of sound mind can see who the bigger child in this conflict is.
Il Divo wrote...
Angus Cousland wrote...
I think anyone of sound mind can see who the bigger child in this conflict is.
Indeed. The daughter.
Modifié par slimgrin, 13 février 2012 - 05:39 .
slimgrin wrote...
The 16 yr old who had the temerity to translate her feelings to words...or the blasto Daddy who just posts sh*t on you tube and shoots sh*t up with hollow point bullets.
"You gotta pay me back fer these here bullits b*tch!"
Modifié par Il Divo, 13 février 2012 - 05:41 .
Modifié par android654, 13 février 2012 - 05:44 .
Il Divo wrote...
slimgrin wrote...
The 16 yr old who had the temerity to translate her feelings to words...or the blasto Daddy who just posts sh*t on you tube and shoots sh*t up with hollow point bullets.
"You gotta pay me back fer these here bullits b*tch!"
Hyperbole? Really? I think that alone speaks volumes. I don't recall him referring to his daughter like that. He simply made an amusing remark regarding her selfishness. He built her a computer, from his own time and resources. She decided to be unappreciative, so she pays for the punishment quite literally.
Modifié par slimgrin, 13 février 2012 - 05:45 .
Guest_Angus Cousland_*
Modifié par Angus Cousland, 13 février 2012 - 05:46 .
slimgrin wrote...
You're right. I threw in the word b*tch. Everything else is what he said. Including the bullets.
Modifié par Il Divo, 13 février 2012 - 05:49 .
Il Divo wrote...
slimgrin wrote...
You're right. I threw in the word b*tch. Everything else is what he said. Including the bullets.
Agreed. But my point is that the cost of the bullets wasn't really the message he was trying to get across. Do we really think he's going to make his daughter pay him back $1 per bullet? Maybe, but probably not. The point, in a larger context, was that he had gone out of his way for her, and that FB message was his "reward". It's a harsh lesson in value and that (in the real world) if we want something, we're forced to work for it, which is something she seems very far from understanding, just based on her casual dismissal of the "cleaning lady".
Guest_Angus Cousland_*
Il Divo wrote...
Agreed. But my point is that the cost of the bullets wasn't really the message he was trying to get across. Do we really think he's going to make his daughter pay him back $1 per bullet? Maybe, but probably not. The point, in a larger context, was that he had gone out of his way for her, and that FB message was his "reward". It's a harsh lesson in value and that (in the real world) if we want something, we're forced to work for it, which is something she seems very far from understanding, just based on her casual dismissal of the "cleaning lady".