146 réponses à ce sujet

[GothDude]

Zenor wrote...

GothDude wrote...

Logan Cloud wrote...

GothDude wrote...

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

GothDude wrote...

its not wat the ps3 utilizes, but what Bioware will want to do. considering it was MS who leaked most of the information of ME3 and as Bioware has stated bout how much that hurt them.
its not a matter of who has a better system or business, MS made it personal

So are you going to make any concrete statements here, with something to back it up, or just make the bizarrest explanation for why YOU want Bioware to make it better on PS3?

Give me something to work with, here.

seriously? you havent followed anything have you?
i'll make this simple for you ok?

Microsoft leakes ME3 - Bioware is hurt by Microsoft's action - Bioware hurts Microsoft by hurting their audience

very simple in payback techniques

Major game developers don't engage in acts of revenge, as that would make them look childish, and damage their reputation.

Also, great comeback. I never thought I was gonna see a "your mom" joke.

a sucky insult deserved a sucky comeback, sorry that it was too good for your insult

You know, the fact you're using "your mom" jokes, possibily insulting community members or possible buyers by saying they have nothing better to do, and not actually listening to both sides of an argument but instead saying "It's MS fault", you have proven yourself to be a fool. I might of thought "hey, he just has diffrent views on things" if you actually took these thing I said before into account. I'll take you seriously if you actually mature up.

sorry, but sometimes when people act immature, they deserve a immature response.
i can have a complete serious conersation if you would like. but when im in the forums, it's good to have fun

[GothDude]

Zenor wrote...

GothDude wrote...

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

GothDude wrote...

seriously? you havent followed anything have you?
i'll make this simple for you ok?

Microsoft leakes ME3 - Bioware is hurt by Microsoft's action - Bioware hurts Microsoft by hurting their audience

very simple in payback techniques

Alright, good. Here we go, this will be fun.


1. "Microsoft leakes ME3." I'm sorry. Perhaps you've never been to a corporation, or worked at one, but see, there are these things called people that work there, and they do the stuff. The corporation itself doesn't actually "do" anything. Thus, a corporation did not "leak" ME3. A person did. There's a massive, huge, gaping difference between the two.

2. "BW is Hurt." How exactly was BW hurt? The only way in which BW was "hurt" is when people realized that BW was losing their way with ME3, what with Cerberus and the Collector Base and the Counselor. And, that wasn't anyone's fault but Bioware.

3. "Bioware hurts MS." Again, how exactly did they "hurt" MS? They didn't "hurt" MS in the slightest. The demo limit is 2GB. They provided a 2 GB demo. Now, if they had provided a 1GB demo, you might have a point. But they didn't.

And, not only that, but how would that have hurt Microsoft? No one's going to change systems merely for a demo, and it's absurd to think so.


Try harder next time, buddy.

how bout you try harder.
one person's mistake that is part of a huge company, costs the company. honetly have you even taken a business class??

Have you? If you did, I think you might of realised that "taking revenge on a company" could have an impact on their profits. This goes for ANYTHING. IT just doesn't make BUSSINESS SENSE.

i have. and business is good

[GothDude]

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

GothDude wrote...

how bout you try harder.
one person's mistake that is part of a huge company, costs the company. honetly have you even taken a business class??

You are amusing. You didn't even refute my point.

You're a really poor troll.

im ignoring your point and trying to push my point across, which you obviously are not getting

[GothDude]

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

GothDude wrote...

im ignoring your point and trying to push my point across, which you obviously are not getting

Then you don't know how a debate/argument works. So you're condemned to lose every one.

no, when you can ignore one's pont and push yours over so far, they eventually get your point.

so far, undefeated in debate class

[Tazzmission]

GothDude wrote...

im sorry. but it sucks for you MS players, demos have to be under 2GB?

im glad i have a PS3

you do realize that makes you sound like a troll right? and if people call you out on it for starting a console war than yea you deserve everything that is stated to you

[GothDude]

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

GothDude wrote...

no, when you can ignore one's pont and push yours over so far, they eventually get your point.

so far, undefeated in debate class

*sigh*

You're doing it wrong.

The way a debate works is, one person makes a claim. The other person refutes that claim with various points. The original person then tries to disprove those points.


Still waiting.

eh, no points to really to refute. so my way works better right now

[GothDude]

Tazzmission wrote...

GothDude wrote...

im sorry. but it sucks for you MS players, demos have to be under 2GB?

im glad i have a PS3

you do realize that makes you sound like a troll right? and if people call you out on it for starting a console war than yea you deserve everything that is stated to you

on every page i have said " I'm not trying to start a console war"
honestly some people man, so blind to wat is right in from of them

[Tazzmission]

GothDude wrote...

charmingcharlie wrote...

GothDude wrote...

im sorry. but it sucks for you MS players, demos have to be under 2GB?

im glad i have a PS3

It sucks for us all because I can tell you now the PS3 and PC version of the demo will be IDENTICAL in content to the Xbox 360 version even though there is no 2gb limit on the PC or PS3 services.

not quite. honestly i think Bioware holds a grudge against MS for leaking the demo and script. payback = PS3 getting a better game. thats the way i see it. hell it happened with ME2

oh really? you do realize alot of reviews have stated the ps3 version of me2 is identical to the 360 version regarding everything

but i guess since your someone better you just know everything right?


heres my proof to back up my claims


Not satisfied with its analysis of the PS3 Mass Effect 2[/i] demo -- which was apparently based on old code -- Digital Foundry has posted a lengthy comparison of the PS3 and Xbox 360 retail editions of Mass Effect 2[/i]. There's a lot of information to digest in the article, including several videos and screenshots. The upshot: Most gamers won't notice the differences between the two games, though it seems the 360 version barely edges out the PS3 one in terms of a consistent frame-rate.

The only significant difference, which boils down to personal preference, is the lighting in the two games. DF notes that the PS3 version's lighting is generally brighter than the 360 game, though not necessarily improved from a technical standpoint. The article also examines the effectiveness of the PS3's "Genesis" comic intro, as opposed to actually playing the original Mass Effect[/i] on 360.

In the end, if you just have[/i] to own the most technically impressive version, DF suggests you choose ... the PC version, of course.http://www.joystiq.c...x-360-original/[/list]

[LiquidLogic2020]

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

GothDude wrote...

no, when you can ignore one's pont and push yours over so far, they eventually get your point.

so far, undefeated in debate class

*sigh*

You're doing it wrong.

The way a debate works is, one person makes a claim. The other person refutes that claim with various points. The original person then tries to disprove those points.


Still waiting.

Just leave it, he lacks the inteligence, understanding and the nomenclature to conduct a debate. It's futile even trying to help him see reason. 

[Tazzmission]

GothDude wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

GothDude wrote...

im sorry. but it sucks for you MS players, demos have to be under 2GB?

im glad i have a PS3

you do realize that makes you sound like a troll right? and if people call you out on it for starting a console war than yea you deserve everything that is stated to you

on every page i have said " I'm not trying to start a console war"
honestly some people man, so blind to wat is right in from of them

oh really? does this quote ring any bells and seem like trolling?

quote
not quite. honestly i think Bioware holds a grudge against MS for leaking the demo and script. payback = PS3 getting a better game. thats the way i see it. hell it happened with ME2

end quote


next time you say your not trying to start a console war learn to look back on previouse statements buddy

Modifié par Tazzmission, 12 février 2012 - 06:28 .

[Fiery Phoenix]

Honestly, Earth was by far my favorite part of the demo. Sur'Kesh, while cool, felt like your typical ME2 shooting gallery, so I didn't really get that much out of it.

[GothDude]

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

GothDude wrote...

eh, no points to really to refute. so my way works better right now

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

Alright, good. Here we go, this will be fun.


1. "Microsoft leakes ME3." I'm sorry. Perhaps you've never been to a corporation, or worked at one, but see, there are these things called people that work there, and they do the stuff. The corporation itself doesn't actually "do" anything. Thus, a corporation did not "leak" ME3. A person did. There's a massive, huge, gaping difference between the two.

2. "BW is Hurt." How exactly was BW hurt? The only way in which BW was "hurt" is when people realized that BW was losing their way with ME3, what with Cerberus and the Collector Base and the Counselor. And, that wasn't anyone's fault but Bioware.

3. "Bioware hurts MS." Again, how exactly did they "hurt" MS? They didn't "hurt" MS in the slightest. The demo limit is 2GB. They provided a 2 GB demo. Now, if they had provided a 1GB demo, you might have a point. But they didn't.

And, not only that, but how would that have hurt Microsoft? No one's going to change systems merely for a demo, and it's absurd to think so.


Try harder next time, buddy.

There you go. Refute away:)

again stuff that i pointed out and you reworded, seriously?

[LiquidLogic2020]

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

LiquidLogic2020 wrote...

Just leave it, he lacks the inteligence, understanding and the nomenclature to conduct a debate. It's futile even trying to help him see reason. 

Oh, I know he's just trolling. It's fun to see him make a fool of himself though.

I envy you, I can only ever get that satisfaction when face to face with the idiot. 

[GothDude]

LiquidLogic2020 wrote...

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

GothDude wrote...

no, when you can ignore one's pont and push yours over so far, they eventually get your point.

so far, undefeated in debate class

*sigh*

You're doing it wrong.

The way a debate works is, one person makes a claim. The other person refutes that claim with various points. The original person then tries to disprove those points.


Still waiting.

Just leave it, he lacks the inteligence, understanding and the nomenclature to conduct a debate. It's futile even trying to help him see reason. 

sir please try to debate once you get to college and i dont mean a community college

[ADLegend21]

bluewolv1970 wrote...

 so far the following are missing from the demo and yet all are presumably in the game (at least has been suggested)

1) a majority of  active dialogue

2) dialogue wheel with more than two choices

3) interupts

4) weapon customization

5) hack/bypass

6) codex


So is it safe to assume that the demo is only designed to showcase combat - because  everything else seems missing....I assumed the demo was to explore all aspects of gameplay but it seems everything but combat has been stripped out...

what part of "we're not giving out spoilers" did you not get at the start of the ME3 marketting. Everything outside of the demo has been short and extremely out of context. You want all that stuff, buy the game. It's a demo for  a reason.

[GothDude]

Logan Cloud wrote...

GothDude wrote...

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

GothDude wrote...

no, when you can ignore one's pont and push yours over so far, they eventually get your point.

so far, undefeated in debate class

*sigh*

You're doing it wrong.

The way a debate works is, one person makes a claim. The other person refutes that claim with various points. The original person then tries to disprove those points.


Still waiting.

eh, no points to really to refute. so my way works better right now

Then you're not making a very good counter-argument are you? Do you not understand how this works? This is like, basic stuff dude.

i understand it more than you, being in debate class and all

[GothDude]

LiquidLogic2020 wrote...

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

LiquidLogic2020 wrote...

Just leave it, he lacks the inteligence, understanding and the nomenclature to conduct a debate. It's futile even trying to help him see reason. 

Oh, I know he's just trolling. It's fun to see him make a fool of himself though.

I envy you, I can only ever get that satisfaction when face to face with the idiot. 

and yet a person you claim to be an idiot, you have never met in person (or you might have) has a higher IQ than you. how sad