Aller au contenu

Photo

Is Flemeth evil?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
129 réponses à ce sujet

#51
kormesios

kormesios
  • Members
  • 232 messages

SLPr0 wrote...
And there is also the possible negative epilogue outcome that if you do not kill her and do not take Morrigan's deal, that she eventually catches up with Morrigan and "kills" her,.


Has anyone gotten this epilogue outcome?  I would accept that as good evidence of Flemeth's plans, if you did nothing and Morrigan dies.  (I'd accept it as partial evidence, if you told Flemeth Morrigan wanted her dead, didn't kill Flemeth, and Morrigan died.)

However, I did a forum search before I posted, and while some people said it was possible, no one in the threads I found had actually seen it.  Plenty didn't kill Flemeth, and Morrigan still survived.

Is there a certain path that gets Morrigan killed?

#52
Kinaori

Kinaori
  • Members
  • 175 messages
Well, she births children for the sole purpose of killing them/inhabiting their body to unnaturally prolong her life. Sounds pretty evil to me :P

#53
SLPr0

SLPr0
  • Members
  • 1 396 messages

kormesios wrote...

SLPr0 wrote...
And there is also the possible negative epilogue outcome that if you do not kill her and do not take Morrigan's deal, that she eventually catches up with Morrigan and "kills" her,.


Has anyone gotten this epilogue outcome?  I would accept that as good evidence of Flemeth's plans, if you did nothing and Morrigan dies.  (I'd accept it as partial evidence, if you told Flemeth Morrigan wanted her dead, didn't kill Flemeth, and Morrigan died.)

However, I did a forum search before I posted, and while some people said it was possible, no one in the threads I found had actually seen it.  Plenty didn't kill Flemeth, and Morrigan still survived.

Is there a certain path that gets Morrigan killed?


As stated I believe the epilogue result for that is if you do not kill Flemeth, and agree to her deal to lie to Morrigan, but then refuse Morrigan's ritual at Redcliffe and do not birth a child with her, the outcome is that Flemeth eventually catches up to Morrigan in the epilogue information for Morrigan and kills Morrigan. I have not seen this epilogue result myself, but read it on the wikia site in regards to potential epilogue endings, so it could be in error...but seems a potential outcome should Morrigan's purpose be thwarted and Flemeth left alive.

#54
Kreidian

Kreidian
  • Members
  • 578 messages
Well consider what we know as facts.



Flemeth saved you and Alistair from the battle. Why?

It seems someone of her power would have likely been able to save others, but she never bothers.

Why you two and no one else? Even Morrigain agrees at first that it would have made more sense to rescue someone more important. If it was merely to save herself from the Blight then she could have rescued more experienced Grey Wardens who would have a greater chance of defeating the Blight.



No, as Morrigan informs you, it was her plan all along to take the soul of the old god in that ritual, and for that she needed newer recruits, those who had not spent so much time with the taint. Morrigan confirms all this when you talk to her about the ritual.



Morrigan also makes it quite clear that Flemeth was indeed consorting with demons. She makes the distinction between the spirits she spoke to before and the demon she merged with later.



After getting the first grimiore many of the companions will talk to Morrigan about it, expressing their own doubts. Morrigan assures them what she says is true, even offers to show them the grimiore so they can see the truth for themselves. She certainly seemed disturbed by her revelation, it does seem, at the very least, that she definitely believes it to be true.



In the end, however, there is no proof of Flemeth's true alignment one way or the other beyond the word of one of your companions. The value of Morrigan's words depend entirely on how much you trust her. Beyond that there isn't, nor is there meant to be, any more evidence one way or the other. Flemeth is a mystery, even to her own daughters.



What I was left to believe is that Flemeth is, at the very least, a possible danger to Morrigan. And Morrigan by this time was a close friend. And so it was out of this sense of friendship that I agreed to kill Flemeth. The sense I got out of talking to Flemeth was that, like alot of things in her long miserable life, she had come to make a game of things. This was likely not the first time one of her daughters discovered the truth, and not the first time one of her daughters recruited someone else to kill her. It was all part of the proccess to her, all part of the tune they all dance to, as it were.



It seems odd for someone as powerful as her to simply give up her grimiore and walk away doesn't it? In truth it's more likely part of the play, a way to get her daughter to become more powerful, and thus become a better host for her. All without needless violence. Morrigan explains that the more powerful a mage the host daughter is the easier it is for Flemeth to possess the body.



But does all this mean she's evil? Hard to say, but she is a threat, and I have more then enough reason to kill her.

#55
Saurel

Saurel
  • Members
  • 958 messages
Would I use the word evil for Flemmeth....no but she is someone I would kill for doing what she does to her daughters. That is if I were in a fantasy setting and I had the capability of killing shapeshifting witches O_o



which I dont.

#56
seraphymon

seraphymon
  • Members
  • 867 messages
i come to agree. that flemeth is evil. There may not be clear cut facts, but based on everything she has done in the past, and what she can do. Is nothing but evil things. When Morrigan speaks nothing less then the truth its then a question of wether or not u believe her. JUst like her and leleiana and even flemeth herself saying she sued to be beatiful in a sense, but she was still soo old. Which just further incites the theory of her taking over her others daughters bodies to remain young.

#57
Lughsan35

Lughsan35
  • Members
  • 491 messages
You all are missing out on one of the great exestentials of exsistance... Good and Evil are perspectives..



That which is with me = Good. That which is against me = Evil.



Rome v Carthage. Carthage thought itself good. Rome though them evil. Both were correct, and the winners right the history.



There is no good or evil there simply is stuff. Its what the apple did to you...



Agreeable = good... things that cause me pain = evil...


#58
Scorus

Scorus
  • Members
  • 92 messages
I'd define her as Chaotic Neutral. She follow her whims and do things that benefit her, regardless of opinions of others. :o

#59
Driveninhifi

Driveninhifi
  • Members
  • 463 messages
You guys are all saying "she possesses her daughters, etc, etc" like we know it's true. We don't. Maybe she does, maybe she doesn't - YOU DON'T KNOW.



Morrigan once mentions that Flemeth used to be young and beautiful, and she remembers it. She even says she doesn't understand how she could have become old so fast, that it makes no sense. Is Morrigan lying or confused? Don't know. Could she have possessed a young body and aged quickly? Don't know.

#60
Maria Caliban

Maria Caliban
  • Members
  • 26 094 messages

kormesios wrote...

@Maria: Yes, I can live with the not knowing.  I'm a little amazed, though, that almost everyone who posts seems so certain.  I don't understand where that's coming from.


I killed her in my first play-through because my PC trusted Morrigan. I don't see any reason for her to lie and demand her mother's death if she just wants the book.

I think a large part of the problem is that this is a game and not real life. We can only ask the questions the developers and writers give us. We can only experience the world that they take time to develop.

By necessity, there are a large number of holes, some of which are larger than others.

I mean, are demons evil? I meet a few evil ones, but I also meet some that aren't doing something evil. NPCs tell me they're evil, and they've been given the name 'demons' by the writers, and they're associated with various sins.

I don't know 100% that they're bad, but the only information in the game I get tells me they are, so when talking about them, I assume as much.

#61
nuculerman

nuculerman
  • Members
  • 1 415 messages

Lughsan35 wrote...

You all are missing out on one of the great exestentials of exsistance... Good and Evil are perspectives..

That which is with me = Good. That which is against me = Evil.

Rome v Carthage. Carthage thought itself good. Rome though them evil. Both were correct, and the winners right the history.

There is no good or evil there simply is stuff. Its what the apple did to you...

Agreeable = good... things that cause me pain = evil...


That's nonsensical.  Perception has no impact on reality.  Existence exists.  A is A.  Right is right and wrong is wrong.  You may think murder is good because you did the murdering, but your perception has no impact on the reality that it was wrong.

If you haven't already, you'll eventually realize that what you just argued is Flemeth's exact philosophy.  And Lord Voldemort's.  Which is pretty funny.

Why is Flemeth evil?  Well, even if we can't know anything Morrigan or legend says about her is true, try talking to the woman.  She believes there is power and there is weakness.  The weak deserve death and the powerful deserve to rule.  Thus, she is evil.  End of argument.

#62
Shady314

Shady314
  • Members
  • 694 messages
The way she raised Morrigan would be more than likely considered child abuse. The Fade Nightmare scenario with Morrigan strongly implies she would beat Morrigan. I'll go ahead and label that as evil.

#63
Original182

Original182
  • Members
  • 1 111 messages

Morrigan's version is coy about the demonic nature.


I'm almost sure Morrigan did say that Flemeth made a pact with a demon to become an abomination. She did not say good spirit, neutral spirit, etc. She specifically said demon.
In your previous post, you claimed that abominations or apprentices who failed aren't the evil ones; the demons controlling them are the evil ones. Therefore Flemeth is evil based on consorting with demons alone.
Name me one other person who has consorted with demons, and isn't considered evil.

As I said, this is nth-hand gossip.  It does NOT come from Morrigan's own knowledge; it supposedly comes from something she reads in a book the Templars had, which she believes is Flemeth's (although she mis-identified it at first).


Morrigan uses logic (never seen other daughters) and what she read from the
grimoire to come to that conclusion. She is intelligent enough to
separate fact from fiction, based on what she knows of Flemeth, and
based on logic.
She knows how to separate gossip of the Chasind from
Flemeth's own account. If the grimoire is something made-up by the
Templars to mislead people, wouldn't you think Morrigan is smart enough
to know it?

But she apparently has no inkling of it from direct, personal observation of Flemeth.


Just because she didn't have any inkling of it, doesn't mean it's not true. All it means is that Flemeth is good at hiding things. But using Morrigan's own personal experience of Flemeth as a mother, and what she read from the grimoire, she did say she should have known that Flemeth was capable of such a thing. If it was the most laughable attempt by Templars to make up stuff about Flemeth, Morrigan would detect it immediately.

So calling Morrigan as an expert witness, when Morrigan is passing on things she hasn't observed herself, doesn't work.


Morrigan is an expert witness solely because she knows Flemeth, more than even you the gamer. And because she knows Flemeth, and after reading the grimoire, she knows Flemeth is fully capable of such a thing. Morrigan is not one to make up stuff about Flemeth.

In addition, even if you think Morrigan *did* know what was true, you have the reliability problem: Morrigan stands to gain considerable power from Flemeth's murder, and demonstrates herself to be concerned primarily with power.  Attempting to get more evidence from Morrigan boils down to her saying "Trust me, and don't talk to Flemeth!  She'll just deny it.  And make sure you bring me the spell book."  So why believe Morrigan?


The probability that Morrigan made up all this stuff just to get Flemeth's power is a very thin argument. Your only argument is just that there is a remote possibility it is true. There is no evidence that indicates Morrigan wants power specifically from Flemeth. She did say power is everything, but never at the expense of her mother.

On the other hand, so many evidence points to Flemeth REALLY wanting to possess Morrigan, based on Morrigan's account of things alone. Flemeth sending Morrigan away to make her a more powerful host for possessing, no other daughters, grimoire knowledge, etc.

There is no conflict of interest. Flemeth's own daughter says she is capable of such a thing. If it was the Templar or Chantry saying this, then maybe you can argue that they're just lying to discredit Flemeth.

One of the posters already mentioned that Flemeth didn't even deny such a thing when you confronted her about it.

So we can safely assume Morrigan really wants to kill Flemeth first to protect herself.

Therefore, the conclusion is that Flemeth is evil. Because she consorts with an evil demon, and she is willing to kill her own daughter to extend her life.

Modifié par Original182, 24 novembre 2009 - 09:20 .


#64
Zenthar Aseth

Zenthar Aseth
  • Members
  • 655 messages

KalosCast wrote...

The Darskpawn are as much a threat to her as they are to the rest of the world, so her helpful actions are far from altruistic.


BS. The darkspawn are no threat to Flemeth. At most, the Darkspawn are a threat to Ferelden and nothing is forcing Flemeth to stay there... there are thousands of Grey Wardens elsewhere in the world.. they would stop the Blight after it would destroy Ferelden.

#65
Maria Caliban

Maria Caliban
  • Members
  • 26 094 messages

Zenthar Aseth wrote...

At most, the Darkspawn are a threat to Ferelden and nothing is forcing Flemeth to stay there...


Actually, we don't know that. We encounter many spirits and beings that are bound to places throughout the game. If Flemeth is able to pick up at any time, why not do so centuries ago and head to a place that's never heard of Flemeth or the Witch of the Wilds?

#66
Zenthar Aseth

Zenthar Aseth
  • Members
  • 655 messages
Yeah, we don't know.. but I'm assuming she is not bound there, considering no evidence suggests otherwise.



As to why she hasn't left.. there could be hundreds of reasons. Perhaps she LIKES being known? The templars must provide some nice excitement.. maybe she just likes the scenery.

#67
Mistersunshine

Mistersunshine
  • Members
  • 307 messages
I don't think that Flemeth was evil. Amoral, certainly, and undoubtedly subscribing to a far different worldview and set of values than the societies around her, but not evil, in my estimation.

#68
Lughsan35

Lughsan35
  • Members
  • 491 messages

I'm almost sure Morrigan did say that Flemeth made a pact with a demon to become an abomination. She did not say good spirit, neutral spirit, etc. She specifically said demon.

In your previous post, you claimed that abominations or apprentices who failed aren't the evil ones; the demons controlling them are the evil ones. Therefore Flemeth is evil based on consorting with demons alone.

Name me one other person who has consorted with demons, and isn't considered evil.




Whomsoever has consorted with 'Angels' in the bible and made pacts with them.



Lucifer is the First among angels the Pinnacle of 'Light' and he fell to his pride and became 'evil'



All the 'Messengers of God' through out that are by nature otherworldly entities some of which have catastrophic consequences attached to them even though they are "good" such as 'smiting the wicked' turning people to pillars of salt' just because god said don't look back and so on...



Malicious, Capricious EVIL at its finest.. yet most people call them the good guys...cracks me up..

#69
Original182

Original182
  • Members
  • 1 111 messages

Lughsan35 wrote...

Whomsoever has consorted with 'Angels' in the bible and made pacts with them.

Lucifer is the First among angels the Pinnacle of 'Light' and he fell to his pride and became 'evil'

All the 'Messengers of God' through out that are by nature otherworldly entities some of which have catastrophic consequences attached to them even though they are "good" such as 'smiting the wicked' turning people to pillars of salt' just because god said don't look back and so on...

Malicious, Capricious EVIL at its finest.. yet most people call them the good guys...cracks me up..


We're not discussing religion. We're discussing whether Flemeth is evil or not. Don't bring in real life religion into this.
If you want, you can compare the good spirit (angel) that Wrynn has, VS the demon that possess Connor, Flemeth, etc. If you're not able to enter this discussion without attempting to flame something, don't join in.

#70
Malsumis

Malsumis
  • Members
  • 256 messages
Good/neutral/evil doesn't matter to me. I just hope we haven't seen the last of this character, she was one of the most interesting characters of the game despite getting little time.

#71
Tennmuerti

Tennmuerti
  • Members
  • 125 messages

Kinaori wrote...

Well, she births children for the sole purpose of killing them/inhabiting their body to unnaturally prolong her life. Sounds pretty evil to me :P


THIS!

I was ok with entertaining the thought of her just being selfish, powerhungry, manipulative etc... but not necessary evil. But then the bomb was dropped.
Like: "Whoa she makes babies just to destroy their souls to live longer! Timeout ... BAD MOJO!" :sick:

#72
Taritu

Taritu
  • Members
  • 2 305 messages

Aderis wrote...

Abomination's are demons, those that the bodies once belonged to were devoured when they were too weak willed to stop the demons. Once you become an abomination, by choice or not, that demon has basically just devoured the soul or spirit of the person originally owning the body that is now used as a vessel for the demons to view the world.

As for that question, is the desire demon in the Circle of Magi tower evil if she is giving him something that he desires in return for her ability to see the world through his eyes? Sure she is taking away his free will but he is happy. Giving him something no one else could because of what he became earlier in his life.


Not always, Wynne is sharing her body with a spirit.  Sometimes an abomination is evil, sometimes the demon is fully in control, sometimes it isn't.  We just don't know with Flemeth.

Though I'd say what we know about her indicates she's rather evil.  OTOH, she saved your life.  The question with both Flemeth and Morrigan to me is less "are they evil" than "can I believe what they're telling me".  Or "can I trust them?"

#73
Lughsan35

Lughsan35
  • Members
  • 491 messages

Original182 wrote...

Lughsan35 wrote...

Whomsoever has consorted with 'Angels' in the bible and made pacts with them.

Lucifer is the First among angels the Pinnacle of 'Light' and he fell to his pride and became 'evil'

All the 'Messengers of God' through out that are by nature otherworldly entities some of which have catastrophic consequences attached to them even though they are "good" such as 'smiting the wicked' turning people to pillars of salt' just because god said don't look back and so on...

Malicious, Capricious EVIL at its finest.. yet most people call them the good guys...cracks me up..


We're not discussing religion. We're discussing whether Flemeth is evil or not. Don't bring in real life religion into this.
If you want, you can compare the good spirit (angel) that Wrynn has, VS the demon that possess Connor, Flemeth, etc. If you're not able to enter this discussion without attempting to flame something, don't join in.


Wasn't a flame.  Was an example not excluded by the OP.. If you like we can go into a myriad of examples from folklore and mythologies of the world, that don't offend your high strung beliefs..

#74
Jafin

Jafin
  • Members
  • 9 messages

SLPr0 wrote...

Overall I do not really understand how they intend to reconcile the epistemology of the epilogue variants, once they expand on this IP. Without ignoring them totally, or forcing a "one epilogue" view to establish the "reality" of the next chapter of this IP in an interactive medium.


That entirely depends on how much work they want to put into this.  Since it is an interactive medium and there exists the means of using data from an old saved game to affect what happens in a sequel, it's entirely possible that what happens is determined by what you did.  If the devs decide to take this approach it will take a LOT of work and the story for further development will continue to branch out so that, eventually, a person could play dragon age 3 and have a completely different experience from another based upon what they did in the previous two games.  I doubt that'd happen, though it'd be amazing, so I suspect perhaps two possibilities will be left to us.

Back to the original topic...

We have to consider, on the subject of the reliability of the evidence, the period we're working with in this game.  The time period and setting of this game is roughly equivalent to that of feudal Europe.  There is no forensic evidence or video surveillance with which to gain undeniable proof.  The kind of undeniable proof the OP is looking for is essentially words from Flemeth's mouth saying "I am an abomination.  I am a demon possessing this body and I seek to destroy the lives of all in Thedas for the sheer pleasure of doing so."  That doesn't exist.

So where does that leave us?  We are left with the legends, with what we've seen with our eyes, with what Morrigan tells us, and, something that has not yet been mentioned, Morrigan's own character.  Since Flemeth raised her, Morrigan is going to exhibit many of the characteristics of her "parent."  The legends tell us Flemeth is an abomination, kidnapper, murderer, the "Witch of the Wilds."  We see that Flemeth saved us from Ostagar, she saved the treaties, she handed them over, and she sent her daughter to journey with us for, then, unknown reasons.  Morrigan tells us essentially what we can infer from the legends with modifications for factual accuracy.  And then there's Morrigan.  I admit, I only just finished my first play through a few hours ago and did not romance Morrigan or use her as part of my "main" party.  But I saw enough of her to know that she is not exactly a model paladin or otherwise upright model of a human being.

With this evidence present and actually being a self-named right hand of the law (that's what we are in these games, aren't we?  Being a Grey Warden helps in that too) we have to decide for ourselves whether she is "evil" or perhaps more accurately a threat to that which we are defending (Ferelden, our companions and friends, the world, etc.)  In a situation like that with which we are confronted in the game we do not have the luxury of fair trials and such.  We have to decide for ourselves what is right and then do it.

Is she evil?  As has been said before, that depends on how you define it.  Do we have enough evidence to support our decision?  That depends on how much evidence you want, but we have to make a decision at some point and the evidence we're given is all we have and we must do with it what is best.

I say she's evil and I killed her.  It was surprisingly easy (hurray for shield wall!)

#75
Lughsan35

Lughsan35
  • Members
  • 491 messages

nuculerman wrote...

Lughsan35 wrote...

You all are missing out on one of the great exestentials of exsistance... Good and Evil are perspectives..

That which is with me = Good. That which is against me = Evil.

Rome v Carthage. Carthage thought itself good. Rome though them evil. Both were correct, and the winners right the history.

There is no good or evil there simply is stuff. Its what the apple did to you...

Agreeable = good... things that cause me pain = evil...


That's nonsensical.  Perception has no impact on reality.  Existence exists.  A is A.  Right is right and wrong is wrong.  You may think murder is good because you did the murdering, but your perception has no impact on the reality that it was wrong.

If you haven't already, you'll eventually realize that what you just argued is Flemeth's exact philosophy.  And Lord Voldemort's.  Which is pretty funny.

Why is Flemeth evil?  Well, even if we can't know anything Morrigan or legend says about her is true, try talking to the woman.  She believes there is power and there is weakness.  The weak deserve death and the powerful deserve to rule.  Thus, she is evil.  End of argument.

Perception IS reality... without it there is.... nothing.. by your definition Nature itself is EVIL and therefor should be destroyed...

Hope you enjoy living in a vacuum, as anything that espouses 'the strong survive and the weak die' is abhorent right?

The arguement only ends because deep inside you realize how utterly feeble your position and that of the 'glad tidings for all' set really is...

Another example a Hurricane is EVIL because it destroys all the weak structures and humans too stupid to flee before it...  mmm yeah right.. the Hurricane is EVIL because some people were stupid and or lazy...yeah right..:alien: