Aller au contenu

Photo

Mass Effect 3 System Requirements with explanation


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
114 réponses à ce sujet

#101
Fredvdp

Fredvdp
  • Members
  • 6 186 messages
I think a Geforce 9800 GT should manage 30 fps at 1080p. That's how my 9600 GT performed in ME2 and ME3 looks slightly worse.

#102
IBPROFEN

IBPROFEN
  • Members
  • 370 messages
My rig specs in sig area

 CPU is 64bit.
MoBo is first run board it was AM2+ which after nephew tweeked it I can run AM3 processor.
 hopefully I can save some money and get another 6570 card to crossfire them.

Modifié par IBPROFEN, 01 mars 2012 - 02:17 .


#103
SSV Enterprise

SSV Enterprise
  • Members
  • 1 668 messages
By "full HD", do you mean 1080p? You indeed probably will want a graphics card with a little more muscle than a 6570 in order to play Mass Effect 3 at 1080p.

However, I would not recommend buying another 6570 for Crossfire. Crossfire comes with a bunch of its own problems -- first of all, you have to wait for AMD to release special profiles for each game for Crossfire to even work. This becomes a problem with games like Skyrim, where AMD waited months to release a Crossfire profile. Crossfire can also cause terrible microstuttering, and other performance issues. It's never as good as just getting a better card. Also, there are hardware compatibility concerns. You need to be sure your motherboard has two PCI-E slots, and that your current Radeon HD 6570 is even capable of Crossfire. The cheaper 6570s don't even have the feature.

Really, it would be best just to save up a little more money, buy something like a Radeon HD 6770 or 7750, and ebay the 6570 or something. You'll save yourself from a bunch of headaches in the long run.

BTW, Fredvdp -- I used a 9800 GT with Mass Effect 2 before getting my current Radeon HD 5770, and it played Mass Effect 2 pretty well at 1080p with around 40 or 50 FPS.

Modifié par SSV Enterprise, 01 mars 2012 - 02:27 .


#104
IBPROFEN

IBPROFEN
  • Members
  • 370 messages

SSV Enterprise wrote...

By "full HD", do you mean 1080p? You indeed probably will want a graphics card with a little more muscle than a 6570 in order to play Mass Effect 3 at 1080p.

However, I would not recommend buying another 6570 for Crossfire. Crossfire comes with a bunch of its own problems -- first of all, you have to wait for AMD to release special profiles for each game for Crossfire to even work. This becomes a problem with games like Skyrim, where AMD waited months to release a Crossfire profile. Crossfire can also cause terrible microstuttering, and other performance issues. It's never as good as just getting a better card. Also, there are hardware compatibility concerns. You need to be sure your motherboard has two PCI-E slots, and that your current Radeon HD 6570 is even capable of Crossfire. The cheaper 6570s don't even have the feature.

Really, it would be best just to save up a little more money, buy something like a Radeon HD 6770 or 7750, and ebay the 6570 or something. You'll save yourself from a bunch of headaches in the long run.

BTW, Fredvdp -- I used a 9800 GT with Mass Effect 2 before getting my current Radeon HD 5770, and it played Mass Effect 2 pretty well at 1080p with around 40 or 50 FPS.


  Well no problems from demo but the game itself may differ. GIGABYTE GV-R657OC-1GI Radeon HD 6570 Video Card - 1GB, GDDR3, PCI-Express 2.1 (x16), HDMI, DVI, VGA, DirectX 11, CrossFire Ready, Single-Slot, Overclocked.
 This is my card I'm not OC'd it but I did increase fan speed alittle bit.
 Its runs Demo at  1920x1080 good. It runs Rage the same  thing with no problem.
 this is MoBo  http://www.msi.com/p...2-Platinum.html

#105
SSV Enterprise

SSV Enterprise
  • Members
  • 1 668 messages
Ok, seems your PC is capable of Crossfire -- that still doesn't mean you should do it rather than just getting a significantly better graphics card.

#106
Arg_Linvail

Arg_Linvail
  • Members
  • 2 messages
I played the demo witn an Intel core I3 4 gig RAM and an intel hd graphics with 1 gb (takes from the ram), and game was around 15-20 average and multiplayer 20-25.

#107
SSV Enterprise

SSV Enterprise
  • Members
  • 1 668 messages
Not surprising...

#108
Peer of the Empire

Peer of the Empire
  • Members
  • 2 044 messages
Better graphics cards can be had for cheap depending on rebate availability

new card generation soon as well

#109
camilbarrr

camilbarrr
  • Members
  • 2 messages
 Hey how will my lap top fair? Should I get it on the 360 instead?

ATI Radeon 5470 HD
4 gigs ram
i5 M 40 2.3 GHz processor
windows 7 64 bit

Thanks

#110
RainSkG

RainSkG
  • Members
  • 2 messages
Do you think I'll be able to play the game? What I'm not sure about is the graphics card...

It is a laptop: Acer Aspire 7741G-6426.
Intel Core i5 480M 2.66 GHz
ATI Radeon 6550M HD - 1 GB
4 GB RAM
Windows 7 64 bit

Some games that I have tried and run well (at High or Medium settings and at max. resolution - 1600x900) are both Mass Effect, DA:O, Resident Evil 5, Tomb Raider: Anniversary, Sims 3 (+ expansions) and Sims Medieval.

But of course, this one seems more demanding, so I don't have very high hopes, but I really wish I can play it. And I just want to be sure before I buy it. I hope someone knows better than me about this! Thanks in advance!


---------------------
I apologize in advance for my english!

Modifié par RainSkG, 05 mars 2012 - 12:10 .


#111
Gorath Alpha

Gorath Alpha
  • Members
  • 10 605 messages

camilbarrr wrote...

 Hey how will my lap top fair? Should I get it on the 360 instead?

ATI Radeon 5470 HD
4 gigs ram
i5 M 40 2.3 GHz processor
windows 7 64 bit


Everything about that laptop is marginal.  The graphics card is about the same as an Xbox360, maybe a smidge worse, which isn't saying I think an Xbox360 offers good gameplay any more.  I think it's two years overdue for replacement. 

#112
SSV Enterprise

SSV Enterprise
  • Members
  • 1 668 messages
Bumping for reference.

#113
EricHVela

EricHVela
  • Members
  • 3 980 messages
Compared to the previous two games, ME3 plays much better in non-ideal environments, too.

Xeon 5150
4GB RAM
Quadro FX580
Windows 7 64-bit
Installation folder on private network share over gigabit network. (Via Origin -- also installed on the private network share.)

For all three, I have tried this configuration and compared to my gaming system. ME1 is just okay with occasional hitching. ME2 has a lot of hitching, frame-rate drop and really extended loading times -- one area took over a minute to load. ME3 plays similarly to my gaming system with only a minor graphics artifact. The transparent shaders that are supposed to morph the image do not morph on that machine. Those shaders are simply transparent without morphing.

That says to me that ME3 has better optimization.

Modifié par ReggarBlane, 19 mai 2012 - 01:07 .


#114
SSV Enterprise

SSV Enterprise
  • Members
  • 1 668 messages
Added a couple examples of cards to use if you're playing the game at 1080p.

#115
Siran

Siran
  • Members
  • 1 760 messages

SSV Enterprise wrote...

Added a couple examples of cards to use if you're playing the game at 1080p.


I'd switch the 6770 with the 7750, they are priced identically and perform similar (with the 7750 maybe slightly in the lead) but the 7750 is based on the new Graphics Core Next architecture, so newer games and drivers should really benefit more than a dated 6770 (which is still based on the Radeon 5xxx architecture)