384 réponses à ce sujet

[libindi]

GnusmasTHX wrote...

libindi wrote...

killerteeth wrote...

Fine my ass, look at this ****!



The xbox demo looks better than this, anyone else getting this on the PC demo?
Running full 1920x1080 res as well.

Likes this。。。

IM HOPING THE FILE HOST DOESNT CHANGE THE RESOLUTION, BUT HERES WHAT THAT SCENE ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE (Nothing like that):

http://i44.tinypic.com/ve526d.jpg



IM ROFLING SO BAD RIGHT NOW, POSTER OF THAT PIC MUST HAVE THE ****TIEST PC

Thank you for regain my faithful on the graphic aspect！this does looks nice.

[GnusmasTHX]

Now that I've composed myself, I truly didn't mean to poke fun at whoever posted that picture's PC, but it is clear now that they're just trying to badmouth the game by posting low quality setting screenshots.

Mine were on default high (same settings as when the game started/launched) except I changed resolution to 1920x1080. I went into the... settings.exe later and the only thing I could improve was Anistropic Filtering, which was on 2x when this was taken, so not significant, but I changed it to 16x afterwards.

Still constant 60 framerate as ME2. Same PC. Way better.

Modifié par GnusmasTHX, 15 février 2012 - 08:03 .

[libindi]

GnusmasTHX wrote...

libindi wrote...

killerteeth wrote...

Fine my ass, look at this ****!



The xbox demo looks better than this, anyone else getting this on the PC demo?
Running full 1920x1080 res as well.

Likes this。。。

IM HOPING THE FILE HOST DOESNT CHANGE THE RESOLUTION, BUT HERES WHAT THAT SCENE ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE (Nothing like that):

http://i44.tinypic.com/ve526d.jpg



IM ROFLING SO BAD RIGHT NOW, POSTER OF THAT PIC MUST HAVE THE ****TIEST PC

Thank you for regain my faith on the graphic aspect!,this does looks as good as ME2, i guess the game set the graphic setting automatic based on your rig.

[Unbannable]

magnetite wrote...

Unbannable wrote...
Interesting.  Thanks for pointing this out!

You're welcome. So if I'm right, we should see high resolution textures (above 1024x1024 for most things) when the game ships. It worked for the first two games, so there's no reason they wouldn't have high resolution textures for this game. Especially since it's based on the Unreal 3.5 engine (also found that out while searching).

I'm pretty sure that ME2 didn't have high resolution textures.  The texture quality was practically the same as the console version, which is why there was no texture detail setting.

Textures may appear sharper on the PC though because the display resolution is higher.

ME on the other hand, did have a texture detail setting.  Before ME2 came out, I remember a graphics programmer stating that the texture detail would be dynamic in ME2, and would increase or decrease depending on how much memory was available.

[Chromie]

Raxxman wrote...

What grates me most is the low expectations around here.

Textures are bad, I didn't expect them to be good
Animations are clunky at times, I didn't expect them to be good
Gameplay is more clunky than GoW/Uncharted/etc I didn't expect it to be
MP is a basic design, I didn't expect better

I mean come on, this is supposed to be a AAA title, best of everything (see SC2, HL2 etc). Not some A+ good but limited in areas game due to poor/unoptimised coding.

Why don't people expect the best from BioWare? Are your expectations for everything BioWare does bar the story really that bad?

They are called biodrones or Bioware defense force. They defend even this ****tiest of Bioware decisions.

Amputat3 wrote...

There's indie games that look better then this crap. (hard reset for one)

Kind of sad really. Then again Flying Wild Hog made a PC exclusive and the game has great graphics and good optimization and the Extended Edition will have further graphic improvements and tweaks while ME3 will remain a ****ty console port.

Look at that lighting and ground textures!



 

 

 

Modifié par Ringo12, 15 février 2012 - 11:27 .

[PSUHammer]

libindi wrote...

Thank you for regain my faith on the graphic aspect!,this does looks as good as ME2, i guess the game set the graphic setting automatic based on your rig.

The poster of that pic probably didn't run the ME3democonfig.exe and tweak his graphics options.

[wijse]

Hammer6767 wrote...

libindi wrote...

Thank you for regain my faith on the graphic aspect!,this does looks as good as ME2, i guess the game set the graphic setting automatic based on your rig.

The poster of that pic probably didn't run the ME3democonfig.exe and tweak his graphics options.

Yeah because high res textures will just pop right out if you put AA and AF to the max.....

[PSUHammer]

libindi wrote...

Gibb_Shepard wrote...

I gotta say, the game looks great. Sure the body textures are bad, but everything else looks fantastic.

And this a rpg game,you will spend half of the time looking at characters,talking to them,so the character texture is very important,not just the face,but the whole character need to look detailed in order to make them look believable and alive,just imagine how the tatto of jack looks like in such a low res texture，im really not asking too much,i just want the graphic to be at least as good as ME2,this is a new game right?

Most of the demo I didn't notice (the actual combat piece) but it was indeed very noticable during beginning dialog scenes.

[PSUHammer]

wijse wrote...

Hammer6767 wrote...

libindi wrote...

Thank you for regain my faith on the graphic aspect!,this does looks as good as ME2, i guess the game set the graphic setting automatic based on your rig.

The poster of that pic probably didn't run the ME3democonfig.exe and tweak his graphics options.

Yeah because high res textures will just pop right out if you put AA and AF to the max.....

Who said that?  All I know is that a lot of people didn't set any of these options and that can have a visual effect on the game.  Thanks, I know the armor/clothing textures are unfixable in the Demo.

[Mettyx]

ItsFreakinJesus wrote...

That's what happens when you build for consoles and PCs simultaneously instead of starting with the PC first and downgrading to consoles.

Yep, like Witcher 2, but Bioware obviously doesn't care about such lofty things as quality, it's all about mass whoring for money now.

[Jurigag]

I only has hope that textures from low settings ...... ^^

[Osena109]

I think it looks epic on the PC    am Starting to think half the people saying it looks Awful have crappy PC's my PC is allmost  5 years old and it looks epic intel Q6600 2.5   evga gtx 460  and  6 GB ram     i know it will look even better on my new X51 am geting in a couple days  I7 3.8 Evga gtx  555 ti   8 GB ram

[robertlieu]

Osena109 wrote...

I think it looks epic on the PC    am Starting to think half the people saying it looks Awful have crappy PC's my PC is allmost  5 years old and it looks epic intel Q6600 2.5   evga gtx 460
and  6 GB ram     i know it will look even better on my new X51 am geting in a couple days  I7 3.8 Evga gtx  555 ti   8 GB ram

5 yrs old my bum the gtx460 came out in like 2009

[Guillerms]

I have been playing both mass effect 1 and 2 for the past week. Today I played the demo and then continued with mass effect 2 and my conclusion was that mass effect 3 looks noticeably worse in the demo than mass effect 2. I cant pinpoint what it is but something is off. I also thought that Anderson look weird...

[sticks435]

Everyone, the guy who posted that pic originally had issues with the install. He reinstalled the demo and the textures were much better. Might want to read the whole tread next time instead of just jumping in and posting.

[wijse]

Ehm.

When the Xbox and the PC has the same graphics when the PC settings are maxed out. Something is wrong.

http://www.pcgames.d...x-360-868381/3/

Feel free to google translate it, if you can't read german. Also there is a texture slider, just move your mouse left and right on the top picture.
 

People said that when the demo of DA 2 came out, it wasn't representative of the full game. Why should we think different about the ME3 demo and the full game?

Modifié par wijse, 16 février 2012 - 02:33 .

[Megakoresh]

Whoever defends the graphics quality of Mass Effect 3 on PC is either blind or a fanboy. Which is kind of a tautology actually...
By the way if you have anything better than 9800GT the configuration utility will crank everything to max anyway. BioWare did not do any adaptation for the PC version for the demo, I just hope the final game will look properly. Mass Effect 2 did.

[Sevrun]

I only had 1 or 2 instances where things didn't display properly and it all looked fine to me. I'm looking at it in HD on a 60' LCD TV, so I think I'd notice more than the occasional glitch (Shep lost his face at one point.)

[wijse]

Sevrun wrote...

I only had 1 or 2 instances where things didn't display properly and it all looked fine to me. I'm looking at it in HD on a 60' LCD TV, so I think I'd notice more than the occasional glitch (Shep lost his face at one point.)

We are not talking about texture glitches or bugs. We are talking about the quality of the graphics/textures.

[GiantHamser DK]

 The textures are bad, nomater what system. My system are:

Intel i5 2500
(6M Cache, 3.30 GHz)
XFX Radeon HD 6970 (2GB GDDR5)
8GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 (1600MHz CL9)

And i captured these screenshots:







But it think there might be hope, if you compare a screenshot i took:


With a screenshot from masseffect.com:

http://na.llnet.biow...-atlas-01-p.jpg 

 
 

[Mettyx]

Sargerus wrote...

 I mean really? 3 ME games and still we must deal with disgusting low resolution textures?

Texture look especially awful when you are equipping your character in multiplayer. Or when you zoom in with a weapon.
Unbelievable.

This is what console peasants have done to us

[Fredvdp]

Hamster, it doesn't look nearly as bad on my PC as on your screens and I have an HD 6870. Textures are bad on my PC but not that bad.

[gabe2gg]

GiantHamser DK wrote...

 The textures are bad, nomater what system. My system are:

Intel i5 2500
(6M Cache, 3.30 GHz)
XFX Radeon HD 6970 (2GB GDDR5)
8GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 (1600MHz CL9)

And i captured these screenshots:







But it think there might be hope, if you compare a screenshot i took:


With a screenshot from masseffect.com:

http://na.llnet.biow...-atlas-01-p.jpg 

 
 

lol at hope. What bioware should of done is hire the animators who created Batman AA/AC for ME3

[DaJe]

makalathbonagin wrote...

GiantHamser DK wrote...

 The textures are bad, nomater what system. My system are:

Intel i5 2500
(6M Cache, 3.30 GHz)
XFX Radeon HD 6970 (2GB GDDR5)
8GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 (1600MHz CL9)

And i captured these screenshots:







But it think there might be hope, if you compare a screenshot i took:


With a screenshot from masseffect.com:

http://na.llnet.biow...-atlas-01-p.jpg 

 
 

GOOD GOD !!! :sick::sick:

I don't need super high res textures but the Sur Kesh background looks like it comes 10 years too late. This 5 years after Crysis in an AAA title is disappointing. And it's not the fault of consoles. Other console games have much better textures and backgrounds. Bioware should have hired optimization experts. Every platform would have profited from that significantly. Instead the budget went into huge amounts of DLC very few people will every see.