the colors are that different the first one is brighter blue the second one is more black you're only showing kirahe in the shadows, the game has a different color palette, different engine it has more of a sunset color that's that. I am using a 6 month old mac it's not my computer.nobunagatron wrote...
N7Raider wrote...
1. isn't the salarian in the first picture the salarian bartender from the ME1 E3 demo
2. assuming those pictures are of kirahe the first picture had the bright blue lighting and the second had the dark lighting tones will change
3. once again the level of nitpicking here is astounding pointing out a continuity error fine, but you're acting like this is a plot hole that would equal the quarians and the geth becoming best friends for no reason. You're whole argument about the way things look being important is complete crap, if that were the case than how come Shepard can be an albino in ME1 and a black guy in ME2?
1. Nope, its Kirrahe, just a smaller version of this :
2. If you really think the difference between pics 1 and 2 is anywhere near as drastic as 1or 2 compared to 3 or 4, then your perception of color is quite a bit off ( AND I'M NOT INSULTING YOU, maybe you monitor is a little old or you percieve colors differently)
and 3 I will address in two parts
3a. It is nowhere near as big an issue as your geth/quarian scenario, In no way are the two comparable, and in no part of ANY of my comments have I compared it to anything as fundamentally as important as the Geth/Quarian war; you are extremely disingenuous to imply otherwise. I have compared it to changing the skin color of Aria, Kolyat, Jacob, and Ms. al-Jilani AFTER having said character appear a different way in the first place.
3b. My "crap" agrument about visual apperance is completely important, relevent, and factual. Video Games are an interactive medium far more reliant on visual imagery than you seem to understand. Games like Okami, El Shaddai, Super Paper Mario, and Borderlands stand out from other games almost solely because of their unique art style and the appearance of their characters and enviroments. Shepard can change appearance because Bioware thinks it is important for you to customize him/her to become unique and ultimately "your Shepard", and because from ME 1 to ME2 Shepard did, suffured ridicoulous damage down to a cellular level, and was REBUILT. ( also note that ingame, you were treated as if you had always looked however your Shepard did in ME2, how the hell else would the VS or Anderson or anyone else recognize Shepard ??)
If you design a character to look a certain way, then obviously you did it for a reason and if your going to change a characters appeareance for any reason, ESPECIALLY to the point where some one who has played ME 1 ( where you first met Kirrahe) dozens of times can't recognize them when they see them, then as a developer you should at the very least have a reason and hopefully share that reason with the fanbase.
Its NOT a gamebreaking issue, I will STILL buy the CE, but yes I personally think character consistency both visually and attitudewise needs to either be consistent or have a reason behind the change.
The whole thing with Shepard looking different in ME2, the goal of the lazarus project was to bring shepard back exactly like he was. You can still change your appearance for no reason so your argument is crap.
Holy crap video games are a visual medium?!? I thought I was reading a very descriptive book! Don't patronize me dude I know they use visuals, you know what else uses visuals movies and they frankly don't seem to give a crap when they recast actors.
As for the fact that you can't recognize him, so? The only recognizable salarian is Mordin and that's only cause he's a lot lighter than the others.






Retour en haut







